Muni Bus-Stop Spacing Analysis Shows 70 Percent of Stops Too Close
"I'm glad they've done the research. It's an option we've wanted the MTA to explore," said Livable City Executive Director Tom Radulovich. "There's a tradeoff, every stop has a constituency. The other thing that unfortunately has happened is that keeping every stop has been mythologized as a social justice movement. We've heard that seniors don't care about speed, poor people don't care about speed, they care about stop spacing. Some analysis that I've seen from the TEP shows the opposite to be the case, some seniors care very much about travel times."
Radulovich added: "There needs to be rigor to it so that it's not political and not arbitrary."
MTA staff noted that nationwide research indicates most people are willing to walk a quarter-mile (1320 ft) to access local transit, though they note that spacing distance should be reduced on steep grades. Further consideration would be given to important transfer points and destinations such as schools, hospitals, and other community facilities. Staff also suggested that approximately 20 percent of delay on the 15 most-used routes is dwell time, due in large part to the density of stops, though it should be noted that the MTA could introduce faster payment options, bus bulb-outs, separated lanes, etc to reduce dwell times.
In their presentation, MTA staff highlighted the 9-San Bruno, a route that has 126 total stops, 70 of which are too close. If 9 inbound and 11 outbound stops were eliminated, MTA estimates it would achieve a 7 minute (5 percent) running times savings and an annual cost savings of $200,000 in operator costs alone.
The policy recommendations will have to go before the full board and will likely lead to significant drama, as supervisors and advocates resist what has been a contentious battle in the past. Staff will provide the board with detailed spacing plans in October and then conduct public hearings in November and December. If all goes to schedule, space consolidation would begin February, 2010.
General Policy Recommendations
- Stop consolidation is needed to meet existing policy guidelines and reduce travel delay
- More flexible policy guidelines are recommended to account for San Francisco’s varying block lengths
- Maintaining access at transfer points and key destinations should remain a priority
- Stop spacing policy should consider delays to onboard customers
Specific Stop Distances
- Stops on grades less than 10 percent: bus stops should be 900'-1400' rather than the existing policy of 800’-1,000’
- Stops on grades over 10 percent: bus stops may be as close as 500' rather than the existing policy of 500’-600' on grades between 10-15 percent and 300'-400' on grades over 15 percent
- Surface Rail stops should be: 1,000’-1,500’ rather than the existing policy of 1,000’-1,200’