San Francisco is Sinking!

un_plaza_fountain_1639.jpgUN Plaza, Market and 7th, the waters from the subterranean "Mighty Hayes River"!!

Famously, we live on a crack in the earth. The San Andreas Fault gets most of our attention, followed not too far behind these days by the equally ominous Hayward Fault. A major earthquake on either of these could alter local landscapes forever, and will certainly damage or destroy freeways, bridges, and the water system. That’s one of our catastrophes waiting in the wings, and it’s good think about preparing for such eventualities.

Less obvious, but just as much a part of our local natural landscape (largely obscured by asphalt and buildings), are the old waterways on which the city is built. The evidence for these underground waterways is in plain view as well as being represented in various public documents. Joel Pomerantz wrote "San Francisco’s Clean Little Secret" a few years ago (first appearing in a book I edited "The Political Edge" City Lights: 2004) wherein he found in SF Water Dept. official reports the saga of the "Mighty Hayes River." Starting deep underground somewhere near Lone Mountain, the subterranean river flows southeast under Civic Center, and as you can see on this map, once surfaced around 7th and Mission.

1852_mission_bay_map.jpg1852 U.S. Coastal Survey Map of San Francisco, from Yerba Buena Cove at upper right to Mission Bay on right. Mission Plank Road is the long diagonal that clips the edge of the swampy wetlands at apx. today’s 7th and Mission.

According to Joel:

"With a hydromorphology not unlike Florida’s everglades, [the Hayes River] broadsides Market Street, encountering a long concrete subway tunnel that interrupts its gait. So copious are the waters of the Hayes that, to protect their investment from damage, BART runs “de-watering” pumps day and night in the Powell Street BART station. Removing, each week, 2.5 million gallons of tested, high-quality, potable groundwater (into the sewer!) the transit agency keeps the Hayes from flooding the tracks."

It’s not far to the obvious subsidence at Natoma Alley just west of 7th where the street level falls at least 5 feet from the grade on the larger 7th Street.

natoma_easterly_at_7th_1600.jpgNatoma Street, easterly, just west of 7th.
natoma_westerly_at_7th_1596.jpgSame intersection of Natoma and 7th looking from east to west.

On Howard Street, a hundred or so feet south, two warehouses have been slowly sinking into the underlying marsh. Several efforts to cosmetically disguise what’s happening have been implemented in recent years, but this latest version, painting the horizontal red boxes, seems to emphasize the effect.

howard_street_eastward_nr_langton_1634.jpgSinking warehouses on Howard Street opposite Langton Alley. Note the red horizontal boxes painted on the front of the darker warehouse… the second one noticeably angles downward. Note too how the stripes in the road indicate the dip.

1122_howard_sinking_to_right_1604.jpgSame warehouse straight on.

 There are a few other spots near here, all in the former wetlands, where you can see the sinking.

extreme_pizza_on_folsom_1609.jpgExtreme Pizza brick building on Folsom near Russ Street. Cracks in the facade have been patched, but there’s no denying the building is slumping to the right, sinking into the marsh!
russ_street_nr_folsom_1593.jpgJust around the corner from the Pizza brick building, on Russ Alley, these cars highlight a sinking spot.
tipping_back_from_folsom_east_of_6th_1612.jpgThese buildings on Folsom between 6th and 5th show signs of subsidence too. The older ones are tipping back from the street, as the rear of the structures are sinking. Before a lot of new lofts were built in the 1990s in this area, many old warehouses were obviously sinking after the 1989 earthquake, on Folsom, Harrison and the alleys in between.

In an 1878 history by J.S. Hittell (History of the City of San Francisco and Incidentally of the State of California, cited in Nancy Olmsted’s Vanished Waters: A History of San Francisco’s Mission Bay. San Francisco: Mission Creek Conservancy, 1986) the 80-100 foot deep marshes presented a significant barrier to surface transportation. The first road to cross them was the Mission Plank tollroad, but there engineering problems right away.

“Mission Bay’s slender connection to Gold Rush San Francisco is the Mission Plank Road. (today’s Mission Street), which opened as a toll road in 1851. Its three-and-a-quarter-mile length ran into trouble for the contractors where it crossed the line of Seventh Street (shown but not named on the map).

Here they projected a bridge built on pilings, “but that plan had to be abandoned, to the astonishment and dismay of the contractor; the first pile, forty feet long, at the first blow of the pile driver sank out of sight, indicating that there was no bottom within forty feet to support a bridge. One pile having disappeared, the contractor hoisted another immediately over the first and in two blows drove the second down beyond the reach of the hammer… there was no foundation within eighty feet… pilings were abandoned, and cribs of logs were laid upon the turf so as to get a wider base than offered by piles. The bridge made thus always shook when crossed by heavy teams and gradually settled till it was in the middle about five feet below the original level… the cost of the road was ninety-six thousand dollars, about thirty thousand dollars per mile… the plank road company obtained another franchise for a road on Folsom Street… in 1854 a high tide overflowed the [Folsom] road between Fourth and Fifth and floated off the planking.”

J.S. Hittell observes that, although these marshy areas were called swamps, “They seem to have been for part of their area at least, subterranean lakes from forty to eighty feet deep, covered by a crust of peat moss eight or ten feet thick… When the streets were first made, the weight of the sand pressed the peat down, so that the water stood where the surface was dry before… More than once a contractor had put on enough sand to raise the street to the official grade, and gave notice to the city engineer to inspect the work, but in the lapse of a day between notice and inspection the sand had sunk down six or eight feet… heavy sand crowded under the light peat at the sides of the street and lifted it up eight or ten feet above its original level, in muddy riddges full of hideous cracks…it was also pushed sidewise so that houses and fences built upon it were carried away from their original position and tilted up at singular angles…”

The toll road to the mission probably would have gone out Market Street instead of trying to cross these soggy swamps, but in that era tall sand hills still dominated the terrain. The relatively flat Market Street we know today was blocked by an 80-foot sandhill between Second and Third Streets… What happened to all that sand? In the period 1859 to 1873, the "steam paddy" (or giant steam shovel—it was said to do the work of twenty Irish laborers at a single stroke) took south-of-Market sand to fill Mission Bay, establishing a century-long pattern of leveling hills and using the sand, rock, and soil to fill in nearby wetlands to "make land." It wasn’t until the 1965 McAteer-Petris Act established the Bay Conservation and Development Commission that the pell-mell filling of the bay was halted.

Downtwn1_market_st_1851.jpgMarket and Powell are written in hand on this 1851 photo. This view is from apx. 2nd and Folsom. Note the very tall sand dunes to the left and in the distance. This is today’s rather flat South of Market area!

Facing ongoing subsidence, rising oceans, and eventual earthquakes, San Franciscans might do well to consider how to cope with a city that is sinking, as the natural landscape beneath resumes its historic trajectory–interrupted, after all, for only about 100 years. A very short time indeed!

 

  • I see Rincon Point nubbing out on that old map …. I’m happy that my condo building (BayCrest, the more affordable Rincon Hill alternative – and very well run building, I might add) is not sitting on top of marsh.

  • Excellent article! $30k a mile in today’s dollars is about $750,000 per mile. Cheap!

    I traced the route of the 18th St creek in Google maps a few months back: http://wp.me/pkeOr-hC

  • RachaelL

    Very nice article … I hadn’t realized how very much of that area was (is?) swampy half-underground lake and needed to be filled!

  • Schtu

    Until a few years ago, the toilets in the AAA building on Van Ness got their water from Hayes Creek running under the building.

  • ZA

    I wish BART would confirm their water pumping.

    Other than that, it’ll be interesting to see whether the pilot project to divert cars along that part of Market Street will have an appreciable impact on UN Plaza, and Halprin’s original intent for that fountain. If not, I hope Halprin will have the wisdom to re-engage his old project and have the courage to turn it over to new ideas to express his original principles for the site.

  • fcp

    @ZA:
    BART’s “dewatering” of Powell station is not a secret, so there’s nothing to “confirm.” The Powell BART station is not the only structure that gets dewatered; other big buildings with deep basements or foundations have to dewater. I have heard that the SFPUC is considering trying to find a way to use this dewatered water source from Powell Station and other major buildings in the area (e.g. Moscone Center) that have to dewater their basements to supply non-potable water for the downtown and Soma. This water would be used to flush toilets and irrigate, substantially reducing water demands and water usage from pristine, potable Tuolumne/Hetch Hetchy water for uses that don’t need potable water, like flushing our crap down to the sewer.

  • ZA

    @FCP – I am not suspicious of CC’s great work. I do want to see more data than one source. I would especially like to see a link to specific water volumes pumped, how much electricity that’s costing us, and the seasonal variability of those volumes.

    The water could definitely go to very many uses, but without solid numbers, it’s hyperbole, not a probability.

  • Jh

    Growing up in SF, conventional wisdom was don’t buy on landfill areas which included south of market (also as it was/is skid row) and the marina. Buy on bedrock.

  • Ja, I remember in about A.D. 1994 I lived on 14th St. just above Guerrero and the street was open for a while, with little bit of water flow in a pipe about 3 to 5 meters down. I remember staring for awhile expecting to see toilet paper, poop, alligators and whatnot but then figgered after awhile that it was actually a underground (at this time the Underground may have still been underground).

    And then going back ten years I lived next to La Ballona Creek, since the early 20th a concrete culvert, and formerly known as the last part of the L.A. River until this was diverted by the atomic bomb dropped by the Gerrys on that city in 19–.

    Fortunately I am almost done: Now in Berlin, formerly a marsh, lots of pumps for drinking water nearby, not safe to drink but not sure why, and the huge French firm Veolia Environment owns 49% of the water supply along with another private company. Veolia funds all sorts of important environmental events. I call it greenwash and my emails are not responded to.

  • Joel Pomerantz

    While I appreciate CC’s enthusiasm for my research and my article, I feel compelled to clarify, for the record: I have never referred to the underground flows as “Hayes River”, let alone “mighty”. Also, 2.5 million gallons per week is not a large amount of water, compared to the 70 to 100 million gallons per day San Francisco users consume through taps and sprinklers. Lobos Creek, a surface flow near Lake Street, supplies the Presidio with between one and two million gallons per day.

    Loose, sandy soils dominate San Francisco from Ocean beach across to the Bay in a wide band that crosses the city just north of Mount Sutro and Buena Vista Park. There’s no doubt whatever that these permeable soils allow many seeps and underground waterways to flow easily beneath the streets and former dunes South of Market. But please remember that there’s rarely been enough water there in the sand to flood the sand out and show as a surface flow.

    The sand and fill combine with the various water sources to make unstable soils which allow for the gradual sinking CC mentions. Before the city’s expansion interfered, the soil was constantly being built up by sand blowing in from the west at least as fast as it was washed out into the Bay.

  • tina

    My fave Robert Smithson quote comes to mind: “The city gives the illusion that earth does not exist.”

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

How Sprawl Worsens California’s Terrible Drought

|
California is in the throes of a drought that Governor Jerry Brown called “unprecedented in recorded history.” There are many factors behind the severity of the state’s drought, and one of them is land use. In a prescient post from last year, Jon Mendelson at Network blog Stockton City Limits warned that California’s water crisis was likely to get […]

The Lure of the Creeks Buried Beneath San Francisco’s Streets

|
Islais Creek Channel. Photo: Matt Baume (Editor’s note: This is Part 2 in a 3-part series on the Bay Area watershed.) San Francisco may be getting new waterfront soon, thanks to ambitious projects currently being studied by the city’s Public Utilities Commission, including proposals for daylighting, or uncovering, long-buried creeks and streams and creating open-air […]
STREETSBLOG USA

Don’t Blame Hills for Pittsburgh’s Pedestrian Injuries

|
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette recently published an in-depth investigation of the city’s pedestrian safety record. The paper reported that 2,100 collisions injured or killed pedestrians in the city between 2006 and 2013. That should be a wake-up call, says Bike PGH Executive Director Scott Bricker on the organization’s blog. But some local traffic engineers are trying to deflect […]

Technology and Impotence

|
The BP oil spill goes on. And on. We watch the oil on live web cam pouring into the Gulf of Mexico. And we watch. Political rage is muted, practical responses even more distant. What to do? How do we “take action” on something like this? How can individuals meaningfully respond to this catastrophe? Stop driving? Boycott one brand of gas? Stop buying things made of plastic?