MTA Must Act Quickly to Convince Merchants of Parking Plan’s Benefits

3538265778_ed834bc637.jpgOn Clement Street in the Inner Richmond, dusk doesn’t bring an end to the search for parking. Flickr photo: bigteetoe

The recommendations in the MTA’s new parking study, which Streetsblog reported on yesterday, are designed to make it easier for customers to find a place to park when they visit businesses on evenings and Sundays. The study comprehensively examines the demand for parking in all of the city’s major commercial districts, aiming to extend meter hours only when and where demand overwhelms the number of available spots. If the MTA doesn’t act quickly and strategically to sell the changes to businesses, however, the study’s great promise could be overwhelmed by protests from merchants who don’t yet see how the plan will benefit them.

"It gives the city more opportunity to just sting the patrons," said
Dallas Udovich, president of the Taraval Parkside Merchants
Association, and owner of Oceanside Sheet Metal.

In interviews with business owners and merchant associations across the
city, it’s clear the MTA has a big task ahead of it: conveying to
merchants that extending meter hours beyond 6 p.m. on weekdays and
Saturday, and adding enforcement on Sundays, will ultimately make it
more convenient for their driving customers to park.

"I hope the MTA moves very cautiously on this whole issue and they
had better do their homework, or there will be a revolt similar to what happened in Oakland,"
said Ken Cleaveland, Director of Government and Public Affairs for the
San Francisco Building Owners and Management Association.

The MTA, though, is now armed with a formidable body of data collected during a 90-day citywide study period that it hopes to distribute as widely as possible. The agency did a considerable amount of outreach, conducting informal interviews with many merchant associations, business
owners, residents, and neighborhood groups. Among residents, forty-two percent supported weeknight meter enforcement completely, and an additional 15
percent supported it if certain conditions are met, compared to 40
percent who opposed it. A total of 42 percent of residents supported Sunday
enforcement completely or conditionally, compared to 52 percent who
said "no." While the numbers supporting the changes may seem low, the figures actually exceeded the agency’s expectations.

Christopher Duderstadt, who owns Christopher Duderstadt Machine Design near 10th Avenue and Irving Street, said it’s important merchants take a closer look at the study. "I can understand how merchants that didn’t understand the study would say, ‘well, people aren’t going to come to my business if they don’t have free parking,’" he said, "[but] the reality is, people can’t come to their business if there’s no parking."

Representatives from merchant groups and community benefit districts (CBDs) in the Castro, the Mission, Noe Valley and North Beach all had concerns about the plan, including impacts on customers and residents. Several also felt the MTA should focus first on tackling disabled parking placard abuse.
Since many of the groups Streetsblog talked to were interviewed by the MTA during the study process, some of their biggest concerns were already addressed in the plan, including extending meter time limits on weeknights and Sundays to four hours, and extending weeknight hours on a per-district basis, depending on demand, instead of increasing enforcement to 10 p.m. across the city.

Though many business groups cited concerns about the plan’s impact on residents, Duderstadt said the study strongly suggests that residents will benefit as well. "One of the criticisms of the study is what would be the impact on the neighborhood, would it push commercial customers into the neighborhood? [The MTA] would argue it works just the other direction: if you provide an open space per block, people don’t circle the block," causing congestion as visitors look for spots on residential streets.

chart.jpgClick to expand: Many of the city’s most popular retail streets are overwhelmed with drivers looking for parking spaces on Sundays. Download PDF here.

In Union Square, the study found on-street parking is scarce at nearly any hour. Linda Mjellem, a spokesperson for the Union Square Association, said she’d welcome a program that encourages drivers to use the existing off-street parking structures, which are often far from full. In fact, the study recommends "[reducing] hourly meter rates in SFMTA parking lots when and where parking occupancy does not exceed 60 percent," in conjunction with expanding meter hours, which might ultimately nudge drivers toward the structures.

Mjellem touched on an approach that the city has been more open to recently: temporary pilot programs. "I like that they’ve been willing to pilot some things, and not fix them in cement," said Mjellem. She hadn’t discussed the plan extensively with her organization yet, but speaking on her own behalf, Mjellem said she "probably would be open to a pilot" of the parking plan.

Several other merchant associations were similarly wary but not doggedly opposed, leaving the MTA with a crucial window of time to make its case. Stephen Adams, president of the Merchants of Upper Market and Castro, said his group is opposed to any meter enforcement extensions, but could probably live with the longer hours on weeknights. On Sundays, he said, parking isn’t a big problem.

Indeed, many merchants said they don’t think parking availability is a big issue on evenings and Sundays. The survey results in the MTA’s study suggest otherwise, however, as occupancy rates indicated that customers in many districts are struggling to find spaces more than ever when the meters shut down. That may seem like common sense, of course, to anyone who’s ever tried to find a parking spot near Clement Street after 6 p.m. or on a Sunday morning for dim sum.

One strategy for winning over businesses might be to do what parking guru Donald Shoup suggests: funnel parking revenue back to the neighborhoods it comes from. Even if a small portion were allocated to maintaining and improving local business district streetscapes, the perception of the plan as a revenue grab by the MTA could change drastically.

"What they should do is give 10 percent of the profits from doing that back to the CDBs, since we’re doing the services that the city should be doing," said Debra Niemann, community representative for the Noe Valley Association CBD. "The least you could do is give some of it back." While Niemann is generally opposed to extending parking hours, she said such a change would cause her to drop her opposition.

Asked by Streetsblog about directing some funds to CBDs, or even pairing Muni service improvements to areas where meter hours would be extended, MTA executive director Nat Ford didn’t rule out the possibility, but said it’s beyond the scope of the study.

"I don’t know if we’re prepared to answer that at this juncture," said Ford. "The way we’ve always looked at this whole process is to not make it a neighborhood or political discussion in terms of this study. This study really just looks at the clear data in terms of occupancy, on availability for parking, and the business activity based on hours. It really didn’t look at certain areas and whether those investments would go back into those particular areas. That’s pretty far down the line in terms of this discussion."

  • “I hope the MTA moves very cautiously on this whole issue and they had better do their homework, or there will be a revolt similar to what happened in Oakland,”

    I hope Ken Cleaveland realizes how ignorant he sounds saying something like that after the MTA released a 40-page study. That’s 40 pages of ‘homework,’ Ken. And it says you’re wrong wrong wrong.

  • CT

    I did not have any problem looking for parking on Clement for the past year at night. It is just not many people coming out for dinner anymore. Plus I live in Sunset. It take me only 10 min to get out of the city to enjoy dinner with out have to think about the meter if I have to pay for it. I guess if we really are moving forward on this. I am sure a lot of us are eating in Daly City.

  • SF Hold em

    CT… I’ll call your bluff and call you a liar too. In my experience I would almost rate Clement parking worse than downtown or the Tenderloin (Mission/Valencia and North Beach are positively the most difficult places to find parking)

    There’s only so much Outback Steakhouse and Fuddruckers you can handle before you’ll surely be missing Burma Superstar. There’s only one San Francisco in the Bay Area and certain things (food, entertainment) are just not replicated in the nearby “competing markets”. Save an overnight culture change or other unforeseen event, people are going to continue to flock to the best neighborhoods in the City.

  • Funny that Nat Ford called reinvesting parking revenues locally “pretty far down the line.”

    While he obviously doesn’t want to auto-embroil into that political cauldron, it seems closer than that. At least by San Francisco standards.

    http://sf.streetsblog.org/2009/07/21/sfcta-completes-exhaustive-parking-study-supervisors-delay-action/

  • Benjamin

    Every time there’s a proposal to increase the cost or the hours of operation of parking meters, people like CT talk a big game about how this is going to be the thing that tips the scale and drives them to commute out of the city with their entertainment dollars.

    It’s nonsense. Paying a few bucks for parking isn’t going to be the tipping point that drives people out of town for the evening. If extending the operational hours of the meters means you can always find a spot within a block or two of where you want to go, then for a few bucks you’re getting convenience you can’t buy today.

    What might drive people away, however, is needing to circle for 30-45 minutes before a spot opens up: if you’re going to drive for more than a half-hour, you might as well leave the city.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

The Land of the Free (Parking)

|
It shouldn’t come as a surprise to those of you who didn’t watch the San Francisco MTA Board meeting yesterday on your live-feed or on SFGTV that the meeting devolved into a referendum on the merits of free, or nearly free, parking. With half a dozen television cameras lined up along the far side of […]

Chinatown Businesses Thrive During a Week Without Car Parking

|
What would happen if, one day, the city decided to make better use of the car parking on a commercial corridor like Stockton Street in Chinatown? “What about the businesses?” opponents might exclaim. “Where would their customers park?” The myth of the urban driving shoppers was debunked again over the past week or so, when […]

Reduced Car Traffic for Subway Construction Praised by Businesses

|
Many merchants often dread street construction projects because they fear it will keep shoppers away from their stores, rarely considering the impacts everyday automobile traffic has on business. They’re more likely to defend automobile traffic and parking based on the myth that most of their customers drive. But on Stockton Street in the Union Square […]

MTA Releases Parking Meter Study that Proposes Extending Hours

|
Photo: Bryan Goebel MTA Chief Nat Ford, at a reporters’ round table today, released the long-anticipated parking study conducted by his agency to measure the traffic impacts of increasing parking meter hours on weekday evenings and on Sundays [Summary PDF] [Full Study PDF]. The study recommends that the agency extend parking meter hours in specific […]