New SFMTA Board Nominee Could Face Uphill Battle for Confirmation

Leona Bridges. Photo: Barclays
Leona Bridges. Photo: Barclays

One of the prevailing questions surrounding yesterday’s nomination of Leona Bridges to the SFMTA Board of Directors — a vacancy the Mayor’s Office has struggled to fill for seven months — is whether she can drum up the six necessary votes on the Board of Supervisors for confirmation, under the current board or the new one in January.

Bridges, who has no background in transportation and is not familiar to transit advocates, was picked for her financial experience and because she “rides the 38 Geary bus frequently.”

“Leona Bridges will bring valuable financial knowledge and investment experience to the SFMTA Board,” Mayor Gavin Newsom said in a statement. “She may not be a City Hall insider or professional activist, but she’s a regular bus rider, churchgoer and longtime San Francisco resident whose background and financial expertise will enormously benefit the Board. I’m grateful for her willingness to serve San Francisco’s transit riders and help improve our City’s public transit system.”

According to the press release, “Bridges is currently retired and formerly a Managing Director of the Global Index and Markets Group at Barclays Global Investors, one of the world’s largest asset managers. Bridges put herself through school working evenings at Crocker Bank and started her career in securities lending and investment at Wells Fargo.”

In addition, “she is committed to education and has created an endowed scholarship in the SFSU College of Business to support economically and educationally disadvantaged students.”

But some public officials and advocates are already questioning whether she has the right qualifications for the job at a time when the SFMTA, particularly Muni, is facing a horde of challenges.

“If there’s someone who’s being appointed to the MTA without the expertise, I really question why that person is being put on the board when we have such an incredible need for the best and the brightest to be on there,” said Supervisor John Avalos.

Tom Radulovich, the executive director of Livable City, agreed. “The MTA Board governs the city’s streets and public transit system. By its own measures, MTA is failing. The MTA Board urgently needs more members who are knowledgeable about, experienced with, and engaged on transportation issues to turn the MTA around.”

Bridges could not be reached for comment and the Mayor’s Press Office did not respond to our requests to put us in touch with her. Google her and you’ll find pages listing her bio and photos from San Francisco Symphony galas, but no record of her speaking out on transit or transportation issues.

Supervisor David Campos, who chairs the Rules Committee, could also not be reached for comment. The nomination must pass Rules before it goes to the full board but there are currently no more Rules Committee meetings scheduled this year, however Campos could schedule one. Supervisors Eric Mar and Michela Alioto-Pier also sit on that committee.

City Hall sources were still digesting news of the nomination but one insider’s first reaction was that having a financial background is not necessarily a good qualification for the SFMTA Board, even though it does meet one of the qualifications in the City Charter:

At least four of the directors must be regular riders of the Municipal Railway, and must continue to be regular riders during their terms. The directors must possess significant knowledge of, or professional experience in, one or more of the fields of government, finance, or labor relations. At least two of the directors must possess significant knowledge of, or professional experience in, the field of public transportation. During their terms, all directors shall be required to ride the Municipal Railway on the average once a week.

The supervisors (either the current board or new one) could opt to reject the nomination and leave it up to the interim mayor, who will also have an opportunity to nominate two additional members to the SFMTA Board in 2011, since the terms for Cameron Beach and Jerry Lee expire in March. Depending on who the next mayor is (the nomination process gets underway Tuesday), it could present an opportunity to shake up the board and depart from business as usual.

The Mayor’s last appointment to the SFMTA Board, Cheryl Brinkman, was cheered by transit advocates. Insiders say Brinkman, who was appointed in July, has been proactive on the issues and has been working behind the scenes to effect changes in the agency.

  • This person has no experience at all with the many issues facing the MTA. The Supervisors should reject her and wait for a better nominee. Newsom has no interest in City politics anymore and is a lame duck and he needs to just go to Sacramento and quit screwing up Muni and the MTA like he has done so for the past several years.

  • gibraltar

    Go San Francisco! Lots of focus on “Transit first” indeed!

    Never thought that being a “regular bus rider, churchgoer and longtime San Francisco resident” qualifies one to be on the MTA board!

  • Nick

    The board members should also be required to read Streetsblog at least once a week!

    They seriously need to appoint people who are beholden to transit advocacy. That’s kind of the point.

  • The interim mayor, whomever he or she is, would do very well by reappointing Cameron Beach. Native San Franciscan, daily Muni rider, retired as Chief Operations Officer of Sacramento Regional Transit, he has been very effective behind the scenes during his term to help transform the agency, which everyone needs to know is like turning an aircraft carrier. He’s not flashy, has no political aspirations, is not beholden to any special interest group, except riders, of which he is one… oh, gee, maybe I just disqualified him.

  • Michael Smith

    Rick makes a very important point. While the interim mayor will indeed have the opportunity to make two appointments next year most people will agree that one of those should be for reappointing Cameron Beach due to his knowledge of transit. We need his experience on the board. But that means that the current vacancy is even more important and can’t be squandered. It is simply pathetic that Newsom took 7 months to make an appointment and then to choose someone with no interest nor experience with transportation. It shows that the issue simply has not been a priority for him.

    We need to hold the mayor responsible for what is happening with Muni and the only way to do that is to give the new interim mayor the ability to appoint good candidates to the board. Therefore the current appointment must be rejected by the Supervisors.