Supes Committee Approves Lower Car Parking Maximums in SoMa

The Yerba Buena parking garage. Flickr photo: ##

As developers bring more residents and employees to the South of Market (SoMa) district, the number of parking lots and garages they build for automobiles will largely determine how much the new tenants and commuters will drive.

But even in a downtown area like SoMa, developers are bound by antiquated planning codes to provide a minimum number of off-street parking spots.

Transit advocates are looking to reverse those restrictions with a piece of legislation [pdf] approved by the SF Board of Supervisors Land Use and Economic Development Committee yesterday. The ordinance would shed the city’s planning code of car parking minimums in SoMa and replace them with parking maximums in some areas. It’s expected to be confirmed by the full Board of Supervisors in the next few weeks.

“This is the next step in comprehensive parking reform in San Francisco,” said Tom Radulovich, the executive director of Livable City, who drafted the legislation along with former D6 Supervisor Chris Daly when he was in office last year. Daly’s successor, Supervisor Jane Kim, took over the legislation as its sponsor.

Among a host of progressive parking reforms, the proposal would bring consistent maximums to the SoMa district, which planning ordinances passed over the years have set differently within individual sections. It would also prohibit office parking garages closest to the downtown job center from structuring parking prices in a way that lures driving commuters.

Other measures would provide a range of options for citywide developers and property owners to sidestep minimum car parking requirements that are still in place. New parking that would impact historic trees or buildings, seismic safety, a street’s character, and traffic may be exempt from the requirements. Tougher restrictions would also be put in place along designated pedestrian, bicycle, and transit corridors as well as in other dense neighborhoods like Chinatown.

Citywide parking minimums vary across different types of buildings. The default requirement for residential dwellings in areas where ordinances haven’t been put in place is one off-street parking spot per unit. Larger hotels are required to provide a spot for every 16 bedrooms, while motels need one for every room.

  • Mooch

    Bravo to Radulovich, Daly, Kim and the Planning Department.  Step by step SF is removing antiquated parking regulations.  Keep up the momentum!  

    The vast majority of SF still has minimum parking requirements, requiring homeowners to build garages where they would rather build a second dwelling unit.  Minimum parking requirements need to be abolished citywide, which would create affordable housing, construction jobs, property taxes, more attractive streetscapes, etc

  • Ry Holman

    sf has gotten a bit out of control with complex parking regulations. Why not just comprehensively zone the city regions for parking and/or add high tax per new spot and call it a day?

  • Anonymous

    For what it’s worth, this is par for the course in American cities, including the complexity. I looked into Houston’s regulations–  a 300 square foot barber shop, for instance, would require 12 parking spaces, or 3900 square feet of parking!

    That said, I like your idea.