Belmont Council Member: “Cars Come First” on Deadly Ralston Avenue

Belmont residents fed up with dangerous conditions from speeding drivers on Ralston Avenue have launched an online petition with nearly 600 signatures so far, calling on the city council to implement safety improvements.

But proponents of safer streets apparently can’t count on support from Belmont City Council Member Coralin Feierbach, who voiced her opposition to bike lanes and red-light cameras this week. “Cars come first,” said Feierbach, according to the Daily Journal. “It’s our lifeline.”

Coralin Feierbach
Coralin Feierbach. Photo: Belmont Patch

Feierbach seemed to have no problem with the fact that “when you ride your bike on Ralston you take your life into your own hands,” deeming it “impossible” to reduce speeding from drivers.

With crosswalks typically placed up to a quarter-mile apart, and the street spanning five wide lanes of motor traffic, walking on Ralston can also be nerve-racking, and often deadly.

But Feierbach’s defense of the dangerous status quo on Ralston won’t do much to help mothers like May Dembowski, who lives in downtown Belmont and regularly walks her 8-year-old daughter on Ralston to Central Elementary School.

“I’m nervous all the time — it’s very stressful to cross. We’ve almost been hit by cars several times,” said Dembowski. “The crosswalk lights don’t give children enough time to get across — even many adults can’t make it. And many drivers are in a hurry and just run the red lights.”

There are 10 schools on or near Ralston, a 2.5-mile long street where drivers often exceed speed limits, which vary from 30 to 40 mph, according to data from the Belmont Public Works Department [PDF]. The street serves as a connection for drivers between the 101 and 280 highways.

According to data from the Belmont Police Department, Ralston saw 70 traffic crashes last year — an average of one every five days. Since 1998, the street has seen an average of 65 crashes annually, according to data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). In those crashes, 193 people suffered injuries — 160 drivers or passengers, and 33 people walking or biking.

Drivers often exceed the speed limit on Ralston Avenue, seen here near Ralston Middle School. Photo: Google Maps

An 80-year-old woman suffered serious injuries in February when she was struck by a driver while crossing Ralston at Notre Dame de Namur. In December 2011, 71-year-old Lourdes Gallegos was killed by a driver as she was crossing the street near El Camino Real.

In 2007, an SUV driver also hospitalized 13 students when he crashed into a SamTrans bus stop in the front of Ralston Middle School, though that took place in the school’s loading area. The San Mateo County District Attorney decided not to press charges against the SUV driver, chalking it up as an innocent mistake.

Two people on bikes have also been injured on Ralston in the past month alone. On June 1, a 46-year-old woman was right-hooked by an SUV driver, and a 75-year-old man crashed near Davis Drive for reasons that remain unclear. In January 2012, a 20-year-old Martinez man was seriously injured after being struck near Holly Road by a van driver pulling a trailer, who dragged him and his bicycle for 100 feet before colliding with the curb. And in October 2012, a 62-year-old woman was hospitalized after being struck by a driver turning left into the Carlmont Village Shopping Center.

An SUV driver injured 13 students by crashing into a bus stop at Ralston Middle School in 2007. Photo: ##http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/BELMONT-Terrifying-crash-as-SUV-hits-students-2597341.php##Lance Iverson, SFGate##

While bike lanes exist on some stretches of Ralston, those crashes all occurred on a section of Ralston which lacks bike lanes, where drivers tend to speed the most.

Mike Swire, who started the online petition, said there seems to be “a serious bike or pedestrian collision every one to two months.”

“It’s amazing that the city has done nothing,” he said. “If there were a homicide or serious assault at that rate, the city would be up in arms. Traffic collisions are a serious public health impact here, but the city’s ignoring it.”

The Belmont City Council did grant initial funding for a study of potential measures to improve safety and reduce traffic congestion on Ralston in February. And safety improvements for the street were included on its list of high-priority projects this year.

However, the council only approved $150,000 of the $250,000 needed for the three-phase study, and the third phase that would enable the city to pursue grants from sources outside the city can’t move forward until the remainder of funding is approved.

Feierbach was one of two members on the five-member council who voted against funding the study, saying, “To spend money first to make decisions later does not make fiscal sense to me,” according to the Daily Journal.

A bicycle rider was injured by a driver on Ralston in October 2012. Photo: ##http://belmont-ca.patch.com/groups/editors-picks/p/petition-calls-for-safer-ralston-ave##Joan Dentler, Belmont Patch##

The Belmont City Council is also set to vote on Tuesday on renewal of a contract for red-light cameras that were installed three years ago at Ralston Avenue and El Camino Real, the city’s busiest intersection. Though data on the impact of those cameras on the intersection aren’t available, red-light cameras typically reduce fatal crashes caused by driver running red lights by 24 percent, according to a 2011 study conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

Feierbach told the Daily Journal she plans to vote against renewing red-light camera contract, saying she doesn’t “think we need them.”

Belmont Planning Commissioner Gladwyn d’Souza, who is running in this November’s city council election to replace Feierbach, begs to differ.

“The town should be safe for everyone. Traffic safety must become a priority for us,” said d’Souza. “No one should have to take their life in their hands to use our streets, especially not our children and parents who can’t drive.”

Supporters can show their support for safety improvements on Ralston by signing the petition.

  • Leon R

    Facts are important here. BPD data show car crashes on Ralston are not rising, but falling. Accidents per mile west of Alameda (where speed limits are higher) are lower than east of Alameda. The school accident referred to here occurred in the school parking lot, not on Ralston. The December 2011 pedestrian who was killed was jaywalking. The other Council person voting no on the traffic study was bicycle-friendly Wozniak. Safer streets are a must for every community, but biased articles like this are not helpful and Mr. Swire and D’Souza ought to know this.

  • Anonymous

    Jaywalking is a social Construction. Pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure is terrible, making obese and inactivity a huge problem. 70% of all cartrips in the States are shorter than 2 miles, that would be approx 10 minutes on a bicycle. Every bicycle on the road is less car-congestion and pollution. Perhabs there is no need to let the killing in traffic continue at the same high rate…the numbers of killed oh injured people are still way to high!

  • Anonymous

    Unfortunate that Coralin Feierbach (and the copywriter of the news script) do not understand the fundamental difference between a road and a street (an avenue is a street by function). A road is for cars. A road is for point to point speedy and safe mobility. A street is for people. A street is a framework for land access and capturing value derived from proximity.

    Ralston is a stroad, which tries to be both a street and a road but fails at both miserably. And stroads (suburban arterials) are recognized by traffic engineers as the most unsafe type of facility in our built environment.

  • KruidigMeisje

    sorry to be blond (i’m from NL, so probably missing some details or something), but children that need to go to school have anxiety to get there? + a road that services 10 schools has a traffic light every quarter mile?
    Is it that children only go to school in cars? (in NL most kids bike or walk. They like it, you know, can go to friends afterwards without having to resort to parenttaxi) Do they like it? OECD index for kids happines for NL isn’t too bad, so council might want to peruse the option??

  • Andy Chow

    Belmont is hilly west of El Camino, so it presents a special condition as to how effectively you can encourage people to walk and especially cycle. The portion of Ralston west of Alameda de Las Pulgas is pretty steep.

  • Anonymous

    If the infrastructure is there, if it is easy if it is safe, people will walk and use a bicycle. The problem is, that bad infrastructure and dead pedestrians has been around for so long, that a lot of people believe it is a law of nature.

  • GuestCommenter

    What they really mean is “cars, über alles”

  • Concerned Resident

    She needs to go…I recall standing next to her after an accident on Ralston and she looked like a deer caught in the headlights. Belmont tragically has no down town, and no down town leadership. They have allowed it to be a freeway and as such this will only get worse.

  • Nicholas Littlejohn

    Join the work to get Feierbach off the council before more are killed on Ralston!

  • Earl

    You say J-walking like that person deserved to die!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Belmont’s Ralston Corridor Study Ignores Need for Safe, Direct Bicycling

|
The Belmont City Council is gearing up to decide on a list of infrastructure investments intended to improve safety and reduce traffic congestion on Ralston Avenue. At a community meeting last month, representatives from consulting firms W-Trans and Alta Planning presented their Ralston Avenue Corridor Study, intended “to improve the multi-modal function” of the busy arterial street. Ralston Avenue […]

Belmont: Ralston Avenue traffic forum

|
From SVBC: The Public Works Department is holding a community forum to discuss traffic concerns and operations along Ralston Ave. No one knows conditions on roads and in neighborhoods better than the people who live with those conditions every day. If there are problems, your comments will help us identify them, and deal with them […]

Today’s Headlines

|
Caltrans Endorses the NACTO Urban Street Design Guide and Protected Bike Lanes (PFB) Happy Walk to Work Day — Press Conference Outside City Hall at 10 A.M. (SF Weekly, Hoodline) SFPD Chief Talks Ped Safety at Elementary School (ABC, CBS), SFPD and Avalos in Ingleside (CBS) Driver Critically Injures Three-Year-Old Boy on Bike at Fulton and 43rd […]

San Mateo County Bike/Ped Safety Projects Starved for Funding

|
Despite growing demand for better walking and biking infrastructure in San Mateo County, active transportation grants from the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) cover only a fraction of the projects that cities want to build, leaving many residents without the sidewalks, bike lanes, and other basic ingredients they need to safely […]