SFPD Renames MAIT Team, Removes “Accident” From Web Site

Photo: ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/35588593@N05/4889086716/in/photostream/##dgollub/Flickr##

The SFPD’s Major Accident Investigation Team has been renamed the Traffic Collision Investigation Team, and the department’s website has removed the term “accident” from its contact info page. The news follows a Streetsblog post on October 21, in which we pointed out that SFPD regularly violates its official policy of referring to car crashes as “collisions.”

The SFPD reportedly announced to the Pedestrian Safety Advisory Committee this week that the MAIT team had been renamed, and a cursory Google search of the term “accident” on the SFPD website turns up only one result, found in the description of the Traffic Company. All other instances on the SFPD’s web pages appear to have been removed. None of the SFPD’s press releases and daily press recaps in recent weeks appeared to have used “accident,” either.

The SFPD deserves credit for responding to this long-standing oversight. The vocabulary chosen by law enforcement officials is important — it can set the tone for how traffic violence is viewed by officers and the public.

Looking forward, we’re hoping to see the department’s view of deaths and injuries on our streets as preventable tragedies consistently reflected by thorough crash investigations and data-driven prioritization of traffic enforcement.

  • bobster1985

    A bit of progress. Good news.

  • ≎ Now, about that “investigation” part …

  • Upright Biker

    Words have consequences, and hopefully by changing these words there will be more justice, less automatic forgiveness, and a higher degree of personal responsibility shown by vehicle operators.

    SFPD is clearly waking up to the new reality of urban transit, and they do deserve credit for coming around.

  • neroden

    Well, most of the states’ “Departments of Highways” were converted into “Departments of Transportation” back in the 1970s…. and yet they still mostly act like departments of highways.

    The change in speech is good, but I hope that changes in behavior follow, and less than 40 years late.

  • djconnel

    Author Michael Connelly’s character Harry Bosch says “there have to be consequences” for crimes when discussing punishments for whom he could easily be sympathetic. This is just fiction, but I wish the same principle was applied to road injuries. If someone is hurt, and someone else is at fault, then other than the injury itself, there “must be consequences” instead of the present standard of neglect.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

MTA To Get Greater Management Role Over SFPD’s Traffic Company

|
Flickr photo: Thomas Hawk According to a "fact sheet" (PDF) released by the Mayor’s office Friday, "new operational improvements and efficiencies" have been identified that will amount to $3.5 million in cost savings for the MTA, including giving MTA Executive Director Nat Ford more power over the SFPD’s Traffic Company. The plan, first reported in […]

SFPD Captain Justifies Bike Crackdown By Misconstruing “Focus on the Five”

|
SFPD Park Station Captain John Sanford is misconstruing the premise of his department’s “Focus on the Five” campaign to justify diverting precious traffic enforcement resources for his own campaign: getting people on bikes to always stop at stop signs, once and for all. Here’s a refresher on Focus on the Five, for those, like Sanford, who need it… […]