Supervisor Breed Calls for Removing Some of SF’s Parking Mandates

Supervisor London Breed has proposed a “Parking Flexibility Ordinance” that would make it easier for building owners and developers not to build car parking when it would impinge on the street environment for walking, bicycling, and transit. It would also count parking spaces against density limits, unless they’re built underground.

Supervisor London Breed. Photo: Supervisor Breed’s Office

The ordinance [PDF] was approved by the Planning Commission last week and is expected to be approved by the Board of Supervisors in the coming weeks.

SF’s 1950s-era parking mandates increase the cost of building housing and limit the space available for apartments, storefronts, and other uses. Minimum parking requirements encourage car ownership, make buildings more susceptible to earthquake damage, cut up SF’s sidewalks with driveways (which also reduce street parking and encourage sidewalk parking), and diminish the pedestrian realm with blank garage doors.

The proposal would amend the planning code so that “builders, businesses, and homeowners can have more say in where and if they put parking on their property,” Conor Johnston, an aide for Breed, told the Planning Commission Thursday.

Breed’s proposal would waive parking mandates in certain situations, including when parking spaces require drivers to cross a curbside bike lane, transit-only lane, or a sidewalk that’s at least 25 feet wide. The additional flexibility will allow existing parking spots to be converted to other uses and let developers forego building new ones.

Breed’s proposal would make it easier for some homeowners to convert their garages into other uses. Photo: Michael Rhodes/Streetsblog

The legislation adds to the Planning Department’s efforts in recent years to relax the city’s “very strict minimum parking requirements,” said Johnston. “They do not limit anyone’s ability to construct parking if they choose, they simply give people more options.”

As parking minimums are relaxed, space opens up for other pursuits. Last year, three cafes and restaurants were built out of former personal parking garages in the Castro, thanks to a 2011 ordinance pushed by Breed’s predecessor, Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi.

Livable City Executive Director Tom Radulovich, who helped craft both Mirkarimi and Breed’s ordinances, said Breed’s new bill “has a lot of smart policy changes in it” that would “create opportunities to improve safety and transit reliability by reducing conflicts with driveways,” and “help green the city, and restore neighborhood character.”

Johnston said the proposal would also encourage homeowners to turn paved driveways into green yards which are required by the planning code. Even though it’s illegal to park on any part of a sidewalk — including the “setback” space between a sidewalk and building —  many homeowners, particularly in SF’s outer neighborhoods, have paved over their front yards to park on them with impunity.

The ordinance would also count above-ground parking spaces against density limits by including parking in a building’s “gross floor area” (GFA). Currently, said Johnston, “There are limits on how much commercial space or housing you can have, but not on parking.” The only existing exception is in high-density “C-3” commercial zones. The ordinance, he said, “will encourage new developments to put their parking underground, and use the floor for active uses like retail and housing.”

Under the status quo, Johnston said building owners are “almost forced” to use the ground floor for parking. “Do we really want to prioritize parking over jobs and housing?”

  • I’m in her district. I’ll write to her and give her a thumbs up.

  • joechoj

    This is expected to pass? Wow, this sounds absolutely transformative for the city’s streets. Am I wrong? (All I hear are crickets.) This should be huge.
    Libby Schaaf, what do you say?!?

  • If this passes people might get the impression cars don’t belong everywhere 🙁

  • Gary Fisher

    I like London! should she be, could she be, Mayor? I am I outta my mind?

  • Easy

    Very nice. The left should love what this does for the environment, the right for what it does for property rights, and the center for all of the above!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Supervisors Pass Breed’s Bill to Loosen Some Parking Mandates

|
The Board of Supervisors yesterday unanimously passed an ordinance removing some of SF’s 1950s-era parking mandates. The “Parking Flexibility Ordinance,” drafted by Supervisors President London Breed and Livable City, will make it easier for building owners and developers to avoid building car parking when it would impinge on the street environment for walking, bicycling, and transit. It would also […]

Planning Department Looks to Boost Bike Parking Requirements

|
Buildings in San Francisco would be required to include more bicycle parking under legislation being developed by the Planning Department. The proposal [PDF] would set consistent guidelines for the number of bike racks required for different types of buildings — covering both on-street bike parking for visitors or in an enclosed area for residents and workers. […]

Livable City: Extra Parking for Car-Share Could Be Abused

|
Update 3/5/13: This bill was finally approved by the Board of Supervisors. Developers would be allowed to skirt limits on car parking if they devote the extra spaces to car-sharing, under a proposal approved unanimously by the SF Planning Commission yesterday. The bill [PDF], which advocates warn could be abused as a loophole to expand […]