Applying the Parklet Strategy to Make Transit Stops Better, Quicker

Planners are looking to use the parklet model to deliver bus bulb-outs at low cost. Muni and AC Transit (shown) are developing programs with different takes on the concept. Image: Ben Kaufman

San Francisco’s parklet revolution has broadened the possibilities for how curb space can be used. Now, city planners in SF and the East Bay are taking the idea in a new direction: using temporary sidewalk extensions to make transit stops more efficient and attractive.

Three different names for the concept have emerged from planners at three institutions where it was conceived independently — “temporary transit bulbs,” “multi-purpose parklets,” and “stoplets.” Those terms come from, respectively, SF transportation agencies, Alameda-Contra Costa Transit, and Ben Kaufman, a graduate student at the UCLA Department of Urban Planning.

Whatever you call it, the method could allow transit agencies to much more rapidly implement transit bulb-outs — sidewalk extensions at transit stops — and reap the benefits at about one-twentieth the cost of pouring concrete, on average, according to Kaufman.

For his UCLA graduate project, Kaufman is wrapping up a stoplet design guide for AC Transit, which received a Safe Routes to Transit grant to study the idea.

Kaufman sees stoplets as a way to re-invent the bus stop. “Why can’t we create a space that people actually want to sit at, that would make people excited to wait for a bus?” he said. “Instead of being a waiting experience, it can be a relaxing experience.” Like parklets, stoplets would be “adopted” by merchants who want to improve bus stops in front of their storefronts.

A permanent transit bulb-out recently installed on McAllister at Divisadero Street for Muni's 5-Fulton buses. Photo: SFMTA
A permanent transit bulb-out recently installed on McAllister at Divisadero Street for Muni’s 5-Fulton buses. Photo: SFMTA

Kaufman, a former SF resident and organizer with the SF Transit Riders Union, presented the idea to SFMTA staff during a summer internship last year with the Muni Forward program (then known as the Transit Effectiveness Project). Stoplets didn’t gain traction with Muni, but he later connected with an AC Transit planner who had the same idea.

In SF, meanwhile, the Planning Department and SF County Transportation Authority are leading a pilot “temporary transit bulb” program with the SFMTA that could put projects on the ground this year.

Unlike stoplets, SF’s transit bulbs would be built by the city at stops where they’re needed most to speed up transit boardings. Their primary purpose would not be to act as attractive gathering spaces, but purely to improve the waiting and boarding experience at transit stops, said Robin Abad Ocubillo, parklet manager for the Planning Department’s Pavement to Parks program.

“These installations are somewhat based on the parklet typology, but with significant changes to serve the performance needs associated with transit vehicles and users,” said Ocubillo. “The new pilot installations would extend the sidewalk to create more ample waiting and boarding areas, provide more efficient boarding and alighting for passengers — especially those who need the deployable ramp [compliant with the American Disabilities Act], and potentially introduce more amenities for transit users.”

Transit bulb-outs make the bus ride faster and more comfortable by eliminating the need for buses to weave in and out of traffic when making stops. The bulbs also provide more room to wait on narrow sidewalks and keep passengers out of the path of people walking by.

By using temporary materials, transit agencies could avoid the relatively high costs and time-consuming construction schedules of concrete sidewalk extensions.

A permanent AC Transit bulb-out recently installed on Webster Street in Alameda. Photo: Aaron Bialick
A permanent AC Transit bulb-out recently installed on Webster Street in Alameda. Photo: Aaron Bialick

According to Kaufman, each concrete transit bulb costs AC Transit an estimated $633,000. At Muni, he said construction costs alone were between $200,000 and $500,000, depending on what utility infrastructure needed to be moved. Parklets and stoplets, by comparison, tend to cost around $20,000, and they don’t interfere with drainage since they’re propped up over curb gutters.

Transit bulbs are a key component of the Muni Forward program in SF, where they’re sprouting up along more routes. Typically, SF’s bulbs are a simple curb extension with a bus shelter. In Oakland and Alameda, AC Transit recently installed bulbs with features like curbs raised above sidewalk height to allow for level bus boarding, as well as greenery along its 51 route.

At least two Oakland merchants want to install parklets at bus stops in front of their storefronts, said Stephen Newhouse, who manages AC Transit’s “multi-purpose parklet” project. The agency is still shaping details like the appropriate share of construction costs merchants should shoulder, if any.

Under Kaufman’s vision, merchants would take stewardship for stoplets, but the city would pay for construction, which he said would allow more merchants to bring parklets to low-income communities. So far, parklets tend to be built in affluent neighborhoods where merchants can pay the up-front costs.

Neglected bus stops, added Kaufman, would also be better maintained by merchant stewards than they have been by Clear Channel, which maintains transit shelters in SF and other cities in exchange for advertising space.

“To be able to create this opportunity for low-income communities and businesses, I think, is a pretty big selling point,” said Kaufman.

Newhouse noted that parklets seem to gain political support more easily than improvements like traditional bus bulbs when replacing curbside car parking. And by consulting the creativity of merchants and residents in stoplet designs, Kaufman said, planners could experiment and help “create new paradigms of what makes a good bus stop.”

AC Transit even enlisted Berkeley High School students this semester in a partnership with UC Berkeley’s Y-Plan program, which brings urban planning classes to schools around the world.

Berkeley High School students present design concepts for "stoplets." Photo: Aaron Bialick
Berkeley High School students present design concepts for “stoplets.” Photo: Aaron Bialick

The Berkeley High class created concept designs for stoplets at eight existing bus stops in Berkeley, conducting on-street surveys in the process. Groups presented their designs late last month to a panel comprised of an AC Transit Board member, an architect, and Berkeley’s Bay Area Bike Share coordinator.

Students are “users of the system,” said Newhouse, “and they have flexible notions of what a bus stop can be.”

In SF, the first few “temporary bus bulbs” will go in at a Potrero Hill public housing site that is poised for redevelopment in the coming years. The idea emerged in the Potrero Hill Neighborhood Transportation Plan as a way to create more public space in a long-neglected neighborhood. Since the streets will be redeveloped in the near future, temporary installations made the most sense, said SFCTA senior planner Michael Schwartz.

Temporary bus bulbs and other sidewalk expansions are coming to the Potrero Terrace public housing site. Image: SFCTA

BRIDGE Housing will be responsible for maintaining the Potrero bus bulbs and other temporary sidewalk expansions, said Schwartz. The spaces will include amenities like greenery, seating, and lighting that wouldn’t likely be part of temporary transit bulbs if expanded citywide.

“Rolling them out citywide is a different question,” said Schwartz.

“When we think about what parklets do, and their morphology,” added Ocubillo, “they have a whole different function” than bus bulbs. “Blending them would be an interesting question, but right now, there it would also be very complex from a liability and management standpoint.”

As the various “stoplet”-like programs emerge, Kaufman said, “With all the minds coming together, I think there’ll be a model for success.”

While SF’s program could go a long way toward improving Muni, Kaufman said there are important benefits to be gained from the approach of letting merchants create parklets. “It lets them get excited about the bus stop and feel obligated to it,” he said, and provides an “activated” gathering space that attracts “eyes on the street.”

“To create that relationship between a bus stop and a small business, I think, will change the ball game.”

  • “Why can’t we create a space that people actually want to sit at, that
    would make people excited to wait for a bus?” he said. “Instead of being
    a waiting experience, it can be a relaxing experience.

    Because we’ve tried that and the results are terrible. See: Powell St. station, 16th and 24th St. BART stations, etc. etc.

    I’m all for public places, and I’m all for public transit, but the two just don’t mix well — at least not in SF.

  • Jimbo

    these spaces get filled with the homeless and we as a city refuse to deal with the homeless problem.

  • baklazhan

    No one’s actually waiting for BART in the plazas, obviously, because you’d miss your train.

    However, I’d say parklets have been successful. And there’s no reason why a parklet which is also a bus stop shouldn’t be any less successful. I think the key is the buy-in from neighboring businesses who keep an eye on it and have an incentive to take care of it– just like any other parklet.

  • Mesozoic Polk

    On the one hand, the Mesozoic Polk Neighborhood Association vigorously opposes any so-called “improvements” that make streets more pleasant or encourage anything other than parked cars to linger by the sidewalk.

    On the other hand, if we absolutely must tolerate this bafflingly popular and resilient parklet program, at least having parklets double up with bus stops would preserve more curb space for its rightful purpose: car storage. (For reference, see Bob Gunderson’s excellent guide to street taxonomy, which explains how street parking is a state of nature.)

    To be honest, we are torn on this one.

  • BBnet3000

    How big of an issue is drainage? There are bus bulbs that still allow waterflow in the existing gutter space: https://www.google.com/maps/@40.723039,-73.998811,3a,43.4y,232.3h,81.15t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sagUx5zDyqWJ07jV8aLQzlg!2e0!6m1!1e1

  • BK

    Good question, @BBnet3000:disqus. It is actually much easier to facilitate drainage through parklet design than bus bulb design, as you don’t have to alter the cross slope of the road. Instead, you just build the platform around it, allowing for drainage underneath the parklet. The stoplet would function similarly. You can check out design guidelines in the SF Planning Department’s parklet manual on pages 35-36: http://pavementtoparks.sfplanning.org/docs/SF_P2P_Parklet_Manual_2.2_FULL.pdf

  • Martijn

    construction costs alone were between $200,000 and $500,000?

    http://www.homewyse.com/services/cost_to_install_concrete_sidewalk.html

    Plus something like this: http://czcx.en.alibaba.com/product/508138560-212093333/polymer_resin_concrete_drainage_channel_drain_with_hot_galvanized_steel_grating.html

    Sure it is a bit more complex than it seems so lets multiply this by 10, that makes about $30.000

  • Dexter Wong

    Bus stop bulbouts have been used on Polk Street for more than 40 years. I remember the first one between Jackson and Washington Streets. It seems your idea of auto paradise is a mall parking lot.

  • Barcelona has about the simplest solution possible for curb extensions: modular concrete pads, with metal grates bridging slight height changes and to not effect drainage.

  • mike_napolis_beard

    (Psst… it’s a satirical account.)

  • c2check

    These are actually plastic. Unfortunately they apparently present some ADA issues in the US (e.g. the lip where the grate meets the curb)
    http://en.zicla.com/

    It would be great if we could get something that would work well here though!!

  • BK

    With all due respect, @disqus_OtPVCbOioJ:disqus, the website you linked to shows generic costs for concrete and labor without taking into account the city in which the sidewalk is being constructed, whether the job is being done by a public or private entity, whether the cost accounts for the cross slope of the street, and how to deal with existing drainage. While your idea of a gutter is a good one, that is not how bulb outs are currently being constructed around the Bay Area.

  • Daniel

    I think this is an amazing idea!!

  • davistrain

    “Make people excited to wait for a bus?”–as one who has waited for buses, the only thing exciting is finally seeing the bus show up, especially if it’s running late.

  • Dexter Wong

    (That’s what you wiseguys always say,” I was joking, what, you got no sense of humor?” Yeah, right!)

  • Peter WU

    in my opinion,the most important part is “Shelter” and lighting sytem,which could be used for advertising.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1e3574694fd2e3843693d80e98da527898d9a75567607582c6b5f77251b2c40f.jpg

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Latest Haight Street Plans Replace Most Stop Signs to Speed Up Muni

|
The Planning Department has an online survey about the Haight Street proposals, available until July 3. City planners recently presented their latest plans for Haight Street, which include two overlapping projects from two agencies. The Haight-Ashbury Public Realm Plan is the Planning Department’s effort to expand sidewalks and add aesthetic treatments along the Upper Haight […]

Bulb-Outs: Noe Valley’s Getting Them, Outer Balboa’s Got Them

|
Two business corridors are getting a boost from sidewalk bulb-outs: Balboa Street in the Outer Richmond recently had some finished, and 24th Street in Noe Valley will get them this fall. The dozen-odd sidewalk extensions on outer Balboa were completed in May as part of a larger project under construction since last year that also includes […]

SFMTA Presents Design Options for a More Livable Polk Street

|
Planners at the SF Municipal Transportation Agency this Saturday unveiled options for redesigning Polk Street as a better place for walking, biking, socializing, and transit. The proposed concepts [PDF] show different ways to arrange the limited amount of street space for traffic lanes (which serve buses on Muni’s 19-Polk line), bike lanes, expanded pedestrian areas, […]

Safer, More Transit-Friendly Streets Planned for the Upper Haight

|
Update 4/10: The Planning Department posted an online survey where you can weigh in on the design proposal for upper Haight Street. The Planning Department has drawn up early plans for three of the Haight-Ashbury’s major streets: upper Haight Street, Stanyan Street, and the southern end of Masonic Avenue. The proposals for the Haight Ashbury […]

Eyes on the Street: Transit Bulb-Outs Installed at Carl and Cole

|
N-Judah riders boarding at Carl and Cole Streets are enjoying a better boarding area after the SF Municipal Transportation Agency built sidewalk bulb-outs (a.k.a. extensions) this weekend. The curb ramps and other finishing touches aren’t in yet, but the wider sidewalks have replaced a handful of car parking spaces with more room for the roughly 4,300 […]