How Have Attitudes Toward Critical Mass Changed? Just Read the Papers

Photo: Mona Caron/sfcriticalmass.org

Last week, press outlets in the Bay Area and beyond hyped the occasion of the 20th anniversary of Critical Mass. Of course, it turned out to be one of the biggest rides ever (likely with the help of the media attention itself).

Looking back, it’s clear that local attitudes toward Critical Mass — from the media, the public, and politicians — have undergone quite an evolution. It’s important to point out that it’s these perspectives that seem to have changed, not necessarily Critical Mass. The ride itself feels as much like a convivial and liberating transformation of public space (which does tend to draw a few aggressive types) as I imagine it did on most of the hundreds of rides that took place over the past 20 years. (I’m not quite old enough to speak to that firsthand.)

Bay Area papers and news stations were buzzing with anticipation of the ride last week, for the most part in a balanced, if not quite positive, way. Perhaps the most pleasantly shocking embrace of Critical Mass in recent history came from last week’s staff editorial in SF Examiner, in which the paper declared:

…At its core, Critical Mass is a political statement about the roads we all pay for and how they should be used. And in spite of the occasional inconvenience that accompanies Critical Mass, it has been very effective as a political movement… Whether you love or hate the Critical Mass rides — and, at times, both attitudes have been appropriate — they have pushed urban cycling issues into the mainstream in San Francisco and around the world.

Granted, the change of ownership at the Examiner has brought a series of progressive editorials this year on issues concerning sustainable transportation and livable streets. But just compare this angle with some of the coverage from the Chronicle and the Examiner in July of 1997. Those pieces were geared to toe the line for then-Mayor Willie Brown’s unsuccessful attempts to co-opt, then declare war on, Critical Mass, which led to a fierce backlash from riders and supporters of the movement. (This history was recounted in a Streetsblog piece from Critical Mass co-founder Chris Carlsson and in Ted White’s 1999 documentary, “We Are Traffic.”)

In one notable piece from that time, the Examiner wrote what begins like a press release amplifying Brown’s calls to “confiscate [riders’] bicycles.” Brown, the paper wrote, “applauded motorists, who he believed generally held their cool under extreme provocation” (although a Chronicle article published the previous day listed reports of conflicts that indicated otherwise). Oddly enough, then-SFPD Chief Fred Lau noted in the article that “there was never any violence or assaultive behavior” before Brown’s attempted intervention.

The backlash against the crackdown has actually led some to credit Brown with driving one of the biggest surges in Critical Mass attendance, SF Bicycle Coalition membership, and the strength of the bike movement as a whole.

Part of Brown’s mistake in trying to control or eliminate Critical Mass was that he tried to “negotiate” with representatives of the SFBC, as if they somehow had control over Critical Mass, which is an amorphous gathering of people riding bikes — not an organization.

While Critical Mass has never been officially tied to the SFBC, executive director Leah Shahum said, “There’s no doubt we’ve all come a long way, and Critical Mass had its role in the early days. Twenty years ago, maybe Critical Mass had a louder voice because there were fewer such channels and event happenings around bicycling. Today, there are so many different options for people to get involved in some way, which is great for everybody.”

There are no clear numbers on the turnout for last week’s anniversary ride, which even included international visitors, but based on press reports and my own observations it’s safe to say that at least several thousand people participated. There were apparently a few scenes of minor aggression from drivers, but nothing serious, especially given the ride’s size. The rides just don’t seem as controversial or unexpected these days, and with Critical Mass now in hundreds of cities, attitudes toward the event in its city of origin seem to have come a long way towards acceptance, if not embrace. Any normal Critical Mass ride these days is escorted by police officers who facilitate the ride and try to break up any conflicts, though they do also block attempts to take freeways or the Bay Bridge.

Noticeable in most of last week’s media reports was a focus around the fun, the magnitude, and the various interpretations of the meaning of the movement, rather than sticking to the portrayal we’ve seen too often over the years of Critical Mass as a menacing disruption to the convenience of motorists, which, the audience is led to believe, is dominated by conflict and violence.

While recent reports of course touched upon the history of occasional conflicts, articles like the Chronicle’s post-event coverage also described the ride’s “calm and festive atmosphere.” The Examiner, despite headlining the event as “polarizing,” gave a voice to Carlsson’s take on “the important political energy” that is created by “the mass seizure of city streets”: “People in politics think it’s irrelevant, but that anarchic philosophy brings a muscular presence to bike issues that would be ignored otherwise,” Carlsson said.

In 2009, even an absurd report from CBS 5 reporter Joe Vazquez which fabricated the “unpaid monetary costs” of Critical Mass was supplemented with a sidebar piece where he described his experience riding it as “a celebration every bit as exhilarating as it is exasperating. A true San Francisco tradition,” he called it. In the CBS broadcast preceding the ride last Friday, anchor Dana King reminded viewers of the report, which Vasquez said organizers “are still mad about,” claiming they called it “irresponsible journalism to even challenge them on this.” (Mysteriously, neither of Vazquez’s pieces were anywhere to be found on the CBS website today.)

CBS apparently isn’t the only outlet that still repeats misinformation bashing Critical Mass. Although ABC 7’s report preceding the ride was mostly fair, reporter Carolyn Tyler did repeat an inflated number of 250 arrests reported by police at the July 1997 ride, even though that number was revealed soon after to only be 110, according to White’s documentary. CBS’s follow-up report leaned more toward the windshield perspective, focusing on the conflict and putting aside the story of the celebration itself. (For more reports, check out our headlines stacks from that week: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)

The long-standing question, which Brown so wrongheadedly tried to answer, is whether there’s an end in sight for Critical Mass. The answer can perhaps be found in the cities where bicycling has been made so safe and normal, that residents may find the idea of Critical Mass pretty odd. In cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam, where a majority of trips in the city centers are made by bike these days, holding an event that calls attention to the need for a place for bicycles on the streets could sound as silly as calling for a Critical Mass of cars — something that already happens every single day. (I experienced the phenomenon of riding in a bike parade in Copenhagen during the Velo-City conference two years ago, which sort of simulated the strangeness of bringing Critical Mass there. The difference was exemplified by the fact that the parade either stayed on the wide, protected bike lanes or kept them clear for non-participating people on bikes to pass by.)

As San Francisco’s streets are made safer with more traffic calming, comfortable bike lanes, and the increasing sense of safety in numbers, San Francisco does seem to be seeing that cultural shift toward the mainstreaming of bicycling — slowly, but surely.

“I’ve really seen a significant lessening of tensions out there on the streets around bicycling issues,” Shahum noted. “In the old days, it felt like bicycling was this ‘other thing’ that other people do. Today, most people in San Francisco bike themselves or are close to someone who bikes regularly.”


Watch the 1999 documentary “We Are Traffic” right here.

  • Orionsan

    You should find the footage of Brown declaring open-season on cyclists on the evening news. I couldn’t believe it. One of the most irresponsible things i have ever seen a politician do.

  • ubringliten

    That’s a great piece. I do agree that CM is one of those things that makes what SF is whether one dislikes it or not, and I am proud to say CM originates in SF and I participated.

    I was there and it was an amazing night. I have gone to SJBP where it averages 3000- 4000 cyclists, and CM 20 was much larger.

  • Jack

    I am pretty much all for Critical Mass… but I also think it’s irresponsible to block traffic for that amount of time in downtown SF.  

    This video was taken from CM on Jones Street.  http://youtu.be/6eb3urqL7M4

    Things can get out of hand and dangerous, there should be better monitoring and traffic control.  Maybe the police should cycle with them and make sure everything goes smoothly.

    All in all, I am a daily bike commuter and I think that the 20th anniversary created more resentment for bikers and makes the streets more unsafe for us.  

  • I’m not sure how you can be “pretty much all for” it by also think “it’s irresponsible to block traffic for than amount of time”.

    It was the first time in the past 100 years that a ride that large has happened.  It’ll probably be at least 5 more before another big one like that happens.

    The police do accompany the ride on motorcycles.

    I didn’t note any resentment from real human beings I’ve interacted with after that ride…there were a couple hotspots on the ride that I noticed, but a lot more people sitting on their hoods or in their cars with smiles and high-fives.  From my sampling, I think it created more appreciation for random San Francisco happenings than resentment for all bikers.

  • Timothy Mallon

    I watched the ride from when it reached my area (about 7:00 pm) to when the cops shut it off. A solid half hour. Very peaceful, just riders enjoying the ride. The bike traffic was far preferable to the cars and motorcycles that slag through on Friday evenings.

    This definitely compared in numbers to the epic ride that so affronted Willie Brown (I remember his appearance on TV after that one), there was even a break off group that looped by about an hour later (without cops) reminded me a bit of the “anarchy” of that occasion.

  • Kevin

    I agree with Roy, and I liked how you put it into perspective. 24hrs a
    day, for weeks and weeks the public roads in SF are car priority. If the
    riders of CM are talking about shifting the use of public space is our
    city, then shouldn’t we have the right to put these ideas into practice?
    And it’s just once every month, with a super big ride once every 10
    years.

    I think the people that are trapped into car-commuting
    want a different way, and I think that they are in the majority just by
    all the smiles and waves I’ve gotten on CM rides.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Ruminations of an Accidental Diplomat: Critical Mass at 20

|
Editor’s note: Next Friday is the 20th Anniversary of Critical Mass. The following is an excerpted version of an introductory essay from Chris Carlsson, one of the founders of Critical Mass, who co-edited the new book Shift Happens! Critical Mass at 20, a compilation of essays on the movement from authors around the world. Critical […]

A Rose By Another Name: San Jose’s Bike Party

|
A crowd assembles at the beginning of San Jose Bike Party, April 16, 2010. Let’s just say right away that Critical Mass is a bike party, and the San Jose Bike Party has a lot more similarities to Critical Mass than differences. A half-dozen San Francisco and Berkeley Critical Mass veterans took a field trip […]

A Lost Decade for San Francisco’s Critical Mass?

|
Critical Mass rolls down Lombard Street, July 2007. Photo by Chris Carlsson Well, no. We’ve had a great run in the 2000s. Averaging between 750 and 3000 riders on any given month, the birthplace of Critical Mass keeps going strong, in spite of the total lack of promotion or organizing during this past decade. But […]

CBS 5’s Joe Vazquez Has a Critical Math Problem

|
Critical Mass, March 2009. Photo by Bryan Goebel. I got a call a week ago from the SF Bike Coalition‘s media person. She was looking for someone to talk to Joe Vazquez of CBS 5, a reporter who was going to do a piece on Critical Mass. I declined, having been interviewed far too often […]

Reviewing the Policing of Critical Mass

|
Now that the new police chief has announced he is going to "review" department procedures with respect to Critical Mass, I think it might be a good time to "review" the history of the relationship between Critical Mass and the police. I have to emphasize that this relationship has evolved in the context of a […]

Is Sunday Streets the Next Critical Mass?

|
Flickr photo: Michael Bolger Though it occurred for just four hours on two miles of streets in the Mission, this week’s Sunday Streets event has transformed the livable streets movement in some of the same ways that Critical Mass transformed San Francisco’s bicycle rights movement in the early 1990s. “Even better than Critical Mass,” was […]