Fate of Caltrain Electrification Hangs on Trump’s Budget

Push for Caltrain Goes Regional, National

Image: Caltrain
Image: Caltrain

Caltrain’s electrification project is coming down to the metaphorical wire.

Details of President Donald Trump’s proposed budget will be released next month, determining the fate of a $647 million grant agreement for Caltrain electrification that was scuttled by the administration in February. In advance of the announcement, the local campaign to save the grant is working with advocates around the state and country.

In this time of hyper-partisan politics, many believe the fate of the project rests not on its merits but on whether or not Congressional leaders from the state’s Republican caucus can be persuaded to not block a project that they perceive would only benefit coastal Californian cities.

“It’s not just Bay Area commuters that ride these trains,” explained Adina Levin of Friends of Caltrain and editor of the website Green Caltrain. “People connect from the Capitol Corridor and the San Joaquin Valley. If these people contact their Congress members, it would have the greatest effect.”

Friends of Caltrain is encouraging transit supporters with access to train stations in San Jose, Santa Clara, San Francisco, and Oakland to reach out to riders of trains coming from Inland California – the ACE, Capitol Corridor, and San Joaquin trains – to make sure those riders know that their Congressional representatives are blocking funding that could make their commutes faster, safer, and more comfortable.

Back in February, transit advocates across the country awaited news on the fate of Caltrain’s project to electrify its tracks. The project would create a faster, smoother, and cleaner ride from San Jose to San Francisco, as well as to all the important job and population centers in between, such as Palo Alto and San Mateo. Officials at Caltrain and the Federal Transit Administration had worked to clear all the statutory and regulatory hurdles, and whether or not the final grant would be signed was seen as a test of the Trump administration and incoming Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao.

Then Chao and the administration decided to postpone approval of the grant, at the urging of members of the California House GOP Caucus. Caltrain supporters were hoping for good news with the release of the administration’s budget priority document later that month, but instead it proposed deep cuts to transit funding nationwide.

Now the focus is on the release of the administration’s more detailed budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1. A deadline with its contractors is looming on June 30, and if Caltrain’s funding is included in the budget, then work on electrification can begin almost immediately. If not, the picture goes from uncertain to desperate.

The worst case scenario is that other funders of the $2 billion electrification project will also pull their funding, killing it. Ironically, much of the objection to this project from the California GOP is because they perceive it will help the California High Speed Rail Project (CAHSR). But if the roughly $700 million CAHSR has budgeted for Caltrain is pulled back, it could be re-purposed to accelerate HSR construction.

Caltrain, and its supporters in Congress, are attempting a different tact to make their case: focusing on the administration’s promises to promote infrastructure and jobs. Yesterday, Congressmember Jackie Speier (D-SF, San Mateo) held a press conference rallying support for Caltrain and its electrification grant. A sign at the event said the president’s transit plans would “Make America Stop Again.”

Senator Diane Feinstein has also been working to make a case for electrification based on economic benefits. Feinstein is promoting a letter written by CEOs of Silicon Valley businesses urging the administration to fund the electrification project.

“At a time when we are encouraged to ‘Build American and Buy American,’ electrifying Caltrain creates 9,600 jobs: from power converters and transformers built in Richmond, Va.; the assembly of electric trains in Salt Lake City, Utah; the transportation of electric train shells in Humble, Texas; or engineering services in San Mateo, California; American workers win,” the CEOs wrote. “The electrification of Caltrain puts Americans to work, while helping our fellow Americans get to work.”

The jobs message seems to be finding traction with GOP leaders, although not with ones in California. Utah Senator Orrin Hatch, perhaps eyeing those jobs making electric trains in Salt Lake City, has been promoting the project. In a recent Washington Post article, Hatch states, “the project would be very beneficial to Utah,” adding that “we’re going to do what we can to get that done.”

  • Ironically, much of the objection to this project from the California GOP is because they perceive it will help the California High Speed Rail Project (CAHSR). But if the roughly $700 million CAHSR has budgeted for Caltrain is pulled back, it could be re-purposed to accelerate HSR construction.

    Let’s not mince words. Electrified Caltrain will be useful for CAHSR, so this is a benefit. However, trying to sabotage HSR via Caltrain will only succeed in crippling Caltrain because I am pretty sure that the CHSRA will be able to find the funds to electrify the part of the Peninsula that they need when that stage arrives. I’ve seen in recent weeks articles that quote Rep. Denham saying something to the effect of being willing to stop blocking the Federal grant if they forego the CHSRA funding. But it makes no sense to forfeit $713mn to gain $647mn and as noted above, putting a “return to sender” on the $713mn from CHSRA only succeeds in making the rest of the CAHSR system that much easier to construct.

  • Drew Levitt

    Jeff Denham’s position is nonsensical, vicious, and nihilistic. He won a pretty tight reelection race last November (winning by 4.8 percentage points) and I will do what I can to get him the hell out of Washington the next chance we get.

  • Yea, I don’t know why some of the Republicans even signed on. Folks like Darrell Issa who barely squeaked into office have a sitting target on their back already and sabotaging Caltrain guaranteed unlimited monies against them from SiVal next year.

  • Vooch

    Calexit 2018 is the solution

  • Drew Levitt

    Don’t I wish. But the question of whether states may leave the Union was settled rather decisively and with a great deal of blood, about 150 years ago…

  • Vooch

    the governing ruling is a SCOTUS case Texas vs. White which concludes it only requires the ‘consent of the states’

    if you believe this is a involuntary union, then you must also believe we live in a absolutist tyranny.

  • Drew Levitt

    I don’t see how the former implies the latter, but thanks for the SCOTUS case reference. In any case, I don’t actually think California should leave the union, even if it is legally and politically feasible to do so. For one thing, removing CA from the Electoral College would effectively condemn the rest of the country to endless right-wing rule. For another, the free flow of talent and capital is really important to CA’s success.

  • Vooch

    “For another, the free flow of talent and capital is really important to CA’s success”

    the flow of immigrates & capital after CALexit would be decided by Californians

    that’s a bad thing ?

  • ahwr

    For one thing, removing CA from the Electoral College would effectively condemn the rest of the country to endless right-wing rule.

    When’s the last time removing California’s votes from the electoral college would have changed the outcome?

    Not 2016, 2012, 2008, 2004, 2000, 1996, 1992 etc…

  • Drew Levitt

    Huh! I had not realized that. I suppose I must retract that argument.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Overhead electrification in Connecticut. Caltrain electrification will survive the Trump Administration after all. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Some Good News for Caltrain

|
After a whole lot of grim news about the Caltrain electrification project it looks as if, finally, there’s a glimmer of hope. A $100 million glimmer at that! Funding for electrification is included in the budget compromise in the federal budget deal announced last week. A release from Friends of Caltrain, celebrates the development: $100 Million for […]
Overhead electrification in Connecticut. Caltrain electrification will survive the Trump Administration after all. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Caltrain Electrification Approved

|
After months of back and forth, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) announced that it is approving $647 million in funds for Caltrain electrification. The grant approval will allow Caltrain to begin construction of its electrification project almost immediately, bringing smoother rides and cleaner air to the Bay Area. “We are very thankful to U.S. Secretary […]