Tomorrow: Support Car Restrictions for a Safer Market, Which Uber Opposes

Image: SFMTA
Image: SFMTA

You can email public comments on the “Safer Market Street” car restrictions to the SFMTA board at

The SFMTA Board of Directors is set to vote tomorrow on whether to ban private auto drivers from turning onto mid-Market Street, part of a package of safety improvements and transit upgrades.

Photo: Matthew Kenaston/Twitter
Photo: Matthew Kenaston/Twitter

While the improvements seem to be backed by a wide coalition, Uber doesn’t belong to it. At the eleventh hour, the ride-hail app company launched a petition to exempt Uber drivers from the restrictions. Though Hoodline reported that the petition had gained 15,000 signatures after Uber’s email blast, the petition webpage was hacked and subsequently taken down by Uber, according to Business Insider.

The “Safer Market Street” improvements are short-term measures aimed at reducing injuries, SFMTA Sustainable Streets Director Tom Maguire told reporters last week. “Our most iconic street should be our safest street.”

On Market between Third and Eighth Streets, where the turn bans would go into effect, private auto drivers make up just 10-30 percent of roadway traffic but were involved in 82 percent of the 162 injury collisions in 2012 and 2013, according to Maguire. Most pedestrians were injured in crosswalks.

The mid-Market stretch contains four of the city’s top 20 intersections for pedestrian injuries, and the two intersections with the most bicycle injuries citywide.

“These types of crash patterns are just not acceptable to us,” said Maguire.

“The Safer Market Street Project is a strong example of a data-driven proposal that is purely focused on safety,” SF Bicycle Coalition wrote in a blog post today. “It’s important that the project moves forward promptly in its strongest form to help protect the thousands of people who walk and bike on Market Street every day.”

Uber dismissed the data while demanding that its drivers be exempt from the turn bans, as taxis will. Uber spokesperson Eva Behrend told the SF Chronicle last week, “Market Street is a major artery of the city, and cutting off riders and driver-partners from accessing this thoroughfare will increase gridlock around town, with no improvement to safety.”

D6 Supervisor Jane Kim stands by the car restrictions, her aide told Hoodline:

When she championed the legislation to establish the Vision Zero policy citywide two years ago, this is the type of engineering change that she had in mind. Engineering to create safer streets, with a priority focus on the corridors and intersections with the highest rates of collisions between vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians, is a critical component of the Vision Zero policy. This change will target four of the worst collision intersections where drivers fail to yield to pedestrians.

Andy Bosselman, a transit activist who uses Uber regularly, blasted Uber’s opposition in an open letter to the SFMTA board.

“It’s time that SFMTA requires these companies to update their pickup and drop off policies around Market Street,” he wrote. “These proposed changes will barely affect these companies.”

The proposed changes include new loading zones on cross streets for pick-ups and drop-offs near Market. Once the turn bans are in effect (scheduled for August), there would be one legal right turn available to private auto drivers to get onto mid-Market eastbound, from Ninth Street.

Market’s transit-only lanes would also be extended, enhancing the speed gains that Muni riders have benefitted from since 2009, when forced right turns diverted private autos off of eastbound Market at Tenth and Sixth Streets.

“Once turns are limited on Market Street,” wrote Bosselman, “all San Franciscans, including Uber customers like myself, will appreciate the improvements to Market Street — and the acceleration of our notoriously slow transit system.”

Getting cars off Market should also simplify navigation for drivers, since most already try to get off soon after they turn onto the street, traveling no more than two blocks on Market, according to the SFMTA.

At an SFMTA press briefing last week, a news cameraman asked Maguire if, in August, “It’s all over for driving between Eighth and Third.” Maguire countered: “In August, it gets a lot safer to walk between Eighth and Third.”

  • Elias Zamaria

    To whom it may concern: the link to Hoodline appears broken. I think it is supposed to point to

  • How about if they’re exempt if their drivers are regulated like taxis? That would be fair.

  • Bruce

    The headline is deliberately misleading. Uber doesn’t oppose the restrictions – they just want an exemption for themselves. That is a hypocritical stance to take, but it’s important to report that stance accurately.

  • The quote from Uber spokesperson Eva Behrend we cited from the Chronicle: “Market Street is a major artery of the city, and cutting off riders and driver-partners from accessing this thoroughfare will increase gridlock around town, with no improvement to safety.”

    Not sure where we’re supposed to be deliberately misleading you to.

  • Fixed.

  • mx

    It’s a little more nuanced (and somewhat ridiculous). Uber isn’t opposing the restrictions in general, just the fact that they are subject to the restrictions.

    Of course, the question is why, if autos are so dangerous on Market St., is the plan to allow unlimited access for taxis, commercial vehicles, semi-trailers, etc…?

  • aslevin

    Totally. The city should call their bluff. Put together a list of the regulations that Uber would follow if regulated as a taxi service and offer the Market street taxi exemption in return.

  • Theoretically, professional drivers are better drivers. Theoretically.

  • yermom72

    But for Uber to be exempt would basically render the restrictions meaningless, because there is no limit to the number of Uber vehicles, and Ubers look almost exactly like regular cars.

    Basically, anyone could stick a “U” on their windshield and viola, instant Market access.

  • gneiss

    Read the article, “On Market between Third and Eighth Streets, where the turn bans would go into effect, private auto drivers make up just 10-30 percent of roadway traffic but were involved in 82 percent of the 162 injury collisions in 2012 and 2013, according to Maguire. Most pedestrians were injured in crosswalks.”

  • Fran Taylor

    One reason to allow taxis on Market is to serve riders with disabilities, who may need door to door service. Cabs are required to pick up people with service dogs, wheelchairs, etc. Uber and Lyft famously disrespect people with disabilities.

  • Boo

    Market at New Montgomery and at 2nd need help. Those are the worst intersections where autos try to turn right but never allow space for cyclists to pass on the left. Result is bikes stuck in between curb and turning cars

  • mx

    I agree. Delivery trucks double-park around that area a lot too making the whole thing a real maze for cyclists.

  • Jame

    This is a case where the cyclists should position themselves better in the lane. Either on the left to make space for a right turning vehicle or in the middle of the lane (taking the lane). But never on the inner part of the curb, even if there is a striped bike lane.

  • Boo

    that’s the point. the cars are blocking the entire lane. cars turning right need to be all the way on the right which most of the time they are not. the cars going straight are usually in the middle or on the left so there’s no space for cyclists to go.

  • murphstahoe

    You do know there are trolley tracks on Market, correct?


SFMTA Proposes New Car Restrictions, Extended Bus Lanes on Lower Market

Last week, the SFMTA presented its proposal to ban private auto drivers from turning onto Market Street, between Third and Eighth Streets. The move would be complemented with extended transit-only lanes, plus a new system of wayfinding signs aimed at keeping drivers off of Market. The new plans, named “Safer Market Street,” would be implemented over nearly a […]

Signs of Lax Enforcement of Car Restrictions on Market Street

Nearly two weeks in, the bans preventing private auto drivers from turning on to most of lower Market Street have, by all accounts, made the street safer and more efficient. But at an SFMTA Board of Directors meeting this week, member Gwyneth Borden noted that officers posted on Market “don’t seem to be as vigilant as one might like,” […]