SFPD Commits to “Vision Zero” With Policy Reforms to Back Up the Rhetoric

[Editor’s note: Streetsblog will not be publishing Monday in observance of Martin Luther King Jr. Day.]

The conversation is changing when it comes to the SFPD’s approach to traffic violence. That much was clear at a four-hour hearing at City Hall last night, where SFPD Chief Suhr and Traffic Company Commander Mikail Ali pledged to pursue Vision Zero, the call to end traffic fatalities within ten years.

SFPD Chief Greg Suhr speaks at the hearing alongside SFMTA Director Ed Reiskin. Photo: ##http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/01/17/san-francisco-pledges-to-boost-traffic-safety-after-deadly-crashes/##CBS 5##
SFPD Chief Greg Suhr speaks at the hearing alongside SFMTA Director Ed Reiskin. Photo: ##http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/01/17/san-francisco-pledges-to-boost-traffic-safety-after-deadly-crashes/##CBS 5##

Suhr told city supervisors and the Police Commission, in a room packed with citizens, the SFPD’s command staff, and every police captain, that “we are committed to a new normal in San Francisco.” And the SFPD backed up the rhetoric by announcing real performance metrics and procedural changes.

The raft of SFPD changes to investigations, citation issuance, and arrests marks a “seismic shift in policy,” Suhr told the Bay Guardian in a video interview after the hearing. It’s too early to say how deep and lasting these reforms will be, but there is real substance to them.

For the first time, SFPD presented a goal to measure the performance of its “Focus on the Five” program: At least 50 percent of tickets issued should be for the five most common violations in crashes in pedestrian crashes — drivers’ violation of pedestrian right-of-way, speeding, running red lights, running stop signs, and turning violations. In 2013, during which the program was in effect, the number was 22 percent, according to Ali.

A policy change initiated in 2013 also allows officers to arrest drivers in fatal crashes where there appears to be “probable cause,” Ali said. That appears to explain the unusual instance of two drivers being arrested for killing pedestrians on New Year’s Eve.

In a new policy change for 2014, Ali said SFPD can now also issue citations to a party found to be at fault. Previously, police policy was not to issue a citation in a crash unless the officer witnessed the violation him or herself. One major reason SFPD said they often refrained from issuing tickets was to avoid double jeopardy — charging someone for the same crime twice — the theory being if the SFPD issued a citation, the district attorney may not be able to legally file charges as well.

Police will also issue citations or make arrests off-scene, when an investigation later determines fault in a case, said Ali. In fact, Suhr said that SFPD would review collision cases throughout the past year for such opportunities, including that of Jikaiah Stevens, who was hit by a driver who admitted to running a red light, yet faced no penalties. Stevens spoke at the hearing after a short documentary telling her story was shown.

“That driver will be issued a citation,” Suhr said. “Going forward, we’re committed to making a decision at the scene and/or doing a mailer if it requires follow-up investigation.”

Suhr also apologized for the botched investigation of the crash that killed Amelie Le Moullac on her bike last August, as well as the behavior of Sergeant Richard Ernst at her vigil. “Our initial investigation was lacking,” he said. “We’re better than that.”

According to an SFPD presentation, a significant drop in citations in the past year has correlated closely with all-time low police staffing levels, due to funding cuts for the police academy. While city officials said that might partly explains a rise in crashes, it’s also crucial that police use data to direct their limited enforcement resources to make the biggest impact on saving lives.

The recent shift in tone from SFPD’s top brass is promising. Suhr and Ali have moved away from wagging fingers at “distracted” pedestrians, instead acknowledging that most crashes are the result of driver error, and that drivers have the most responsibility to keep people safe on the streets. Ali also stressed the importance of avoiding the term “accident,” using “collision” instead, while Suhr cited survey statistics on the growing problem of distracted driving.

Read more on the discussion from supervisors, police commissioners, and the dozens of public commenters that spoke at the hearing from KQED, the Bay Guardian, the SF Chronicle, and the SF Examiner.

A rally for Vision Zero will be held on the steps of City Hall, Tuesday at 12 p.m., preceding the SFMTA Board of Directors meeting.

Here’s the Bay Guardian’s interview with Suhr:

  • This is promising if it indeed turns into reality on the street.

  • susan king

    Just watched the news- elderly woman in Nob Hill hit by a Lyft driver- she was in the cross walk, driver making a left hit her. The Police officer interviewed stated that the driver will not be cited in this instance. He went on to say everyone needs to be careful, and pedestrians often don’t pay attention. Vision Zero is off to a weak start.

  • jamiewhitaker

    Sign SFTRU’s petition asking SFMTA, BOS, and Mayor Lee to keep Sunday Meters running – that is $6-$7 million per year to help fund some of the Vision Zero needs. http://sftru.nationbuilder.com/sunday_parking_meters

  • Sprague
  • laughtiger

    And how about getting these unlicensed, uninsured taxis off the street? Distracted by their smartphones, no less…

  • Upright Biker

    The Chief has taken a bold stand. I admire that.

    This is a potentially big win. Now, let’s see if Mayor Lee and the SFMTA board come to their senses.

  • I noticed the Ingleside SFPD report has a blurb for “pedestrians and drivers” that I’m 90% sure was written for pedestrians and then someone tacked “and drivers” to the end of. True, they do have some bulletpoints for each, but the first paragraph is about being aware of dangers posed by cars and making eye contact with drivers. But this is possibly some older boilerplate that they just haven’t combed through completely, yet.

  • voltairesmistress

    My understanding is that at least some ride share companies have an agreement to operate through the state PUC, and that this includes carrying insurance coverage. Not sure of the particulars, but pretty sure this is a case of insurance and regulation catching up to a new industry made possible through new technology. Ultimately, fighting alternative taxi services is a losing proposition. They fill a gaping hole in transit coverage and are overall an extremely positive, if disruptive, economic innovation. Tweaking ride-share operations, not eliminating them, is the answer.

  • Joe A. W. Fitzgerald

    I appreciate linking to Guardian content, but if you’d embed the video we’d appreciate that too. Good piece!

  • yiqi
  • SteveVaccaro

    This is incredible. Way to go, SF!

  • djconnel

    Emails sent. Thanks!

  • laughtiger

    Tweaking taxi operations, not eliminating them, is the answer. “Ride-sharing” is a completely different thing than what the TNCs do. What is going on with the TNCs is a market experiment in deregulation which is likely to end in disaster, like it has before. The fact that these companies try to pass themselves off as “ridesharing” only shows how shady they are, as is the fact that they refuse to pay out the insurance when their drivers hit pedestrians. Uber has washed their hands of the fatality on New Years’ and Lyft has not stepped up to the plate as far as I know.

    The particulars are important. If you want to encourage real ridesharing — a real innovation, not just a deregulatory scheme — check out Carma or ERideshare. Lyft, Uber, Sidecar, these are just taxi companies hiding under another name.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Police Chief Resigns: What Does it Mean for Livable Streets?

|
As Streetsblog readers have surely heard, police Chief Greg Suhr was forced to resign Thursday after the shooting of an apparently unarmed woman by SFPD. The police shootings of Mario Woods in December and Luis Gongora in April both seemed to show a department where officers are failing to deescalate situations and are too quick […]