SFMTA Bucks Uber, Bans Private Autos From Turning On to Mid-Market Street

Uber's Wayne Ting told the SFMTA board the company opposed "preferential treatment" for taxis on Market Street. Video screenshot from Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez/YouTube
Uber’s Wayne Ting told the SFMTA board the company opposed “preferential treatment” for taxis on Market Street. Video screenshot from Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez/YouTube

Private auto drivers will be banned from turning on to Market Street between Third and Eighth streets after the restrictions were approved unanimously by the SFMTA Board of Directors yesterday.

The board dismissed the last-minute protest from Uber, who complained that its ride-hail drivers would be included in the ban, while taxis wouldn’t. In the roughly three hours of public comment, the vast majority of speakers supported the bans — safe streets advocates and taxi drivers alike.

Uber had initially criticized the plan outright, saying that it would “increase gridlock around town, with no improvement to safety.” But reps from Uber and Lyft, which have long fought the kind of regulations applied to the taxi industry, told the SFMTA board they support turn bans to make Market safer as long as they’re also applied to taxis.

“It creates a preferential treatment for one form of transportation over another,” Wayne Ting, Uber’s SF general manager told the board, eliciting jeers from members of the audience.

“If Uber wants to be regulated like a taxi then they can have the benefits of being regulated,” Walk SF Executive Director Nicole Ferrara told Bay City News.

The SF Transit Riders Union “wants to see San Francisco prioritize sustainable transit on Market Street, including Muni, biking and walking,” SFTRU’s Ilyse Magy said in a statement. Ride-hail apps, a.k.a. transportation network companies, are “now an important part of transportation in San Francisco, but these vehicles are also a huge source of transit-slowing congestion and pedestrian conflict. While the perfect layout for Market Street is still unclear, one thing is certain: it starts with reducing private vehicle traffic, which includes TNCs.”

Private auto drivers won’t be entirely banned from that stretch of Market once the turn restrictions are adopted, as scheduled for August. Drivers will be able to reach eastbound Market, between Eighth and Sixth Streets, by turning right from Ninth Street. Westbound drivers will be able to continue straight on Market from east of Third.

See more coverage of the meeting from the SF Examiner, the SF Chronicle, and Bay City News.

  • Rules are all well and good, but I’m guessing there will be no effort to actually enforce this, right? Just like the rest of traffic laws in SF?

  • So glad they are letting cabs on Market Street, since they are well known for “careful speeding” http://m.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/S-F-vision-Catch-speeders-on-camera-but-6296925.php

  • ARRO

    If there was actually any proper enforcement, there wouldn’t be an argument for these additional knee-jerk political restrictions.

  • ARRO

    “maybe 40 mph in a 25 mph zone — was OK.”, this doesn’t seem in line with their Vision Zero policy and looks like a political favor to the taxi unions rather then actually being about safety.

  • laughtiger

    You left out the quote from the first cabdriver:

    “In front of the InterContinental San Francisco hotel,
    waiting cabdriver Safu Zewedi also thought speed cameras were OK, as
    long as they apply equally to Uber drivers, who are already making
    things tough on cabbies.

    “It should apply to everyone,” he said. “You see careless drivers
    every day in San Francisco. Speed is why a lot of accidents happen.””

  • lunartree

    Cab drivers are the reason I stopped using cabs…

  • p_chazz

    Now that Uber’s drivers have been ruled as employees by the Labor Commission, maybe now they can qualify for the taxi exemption!

  • M.

    The cameras would capture drivers’ faces or license plates so yes, there would be enforcement though not on the spot. This works very well in other locations. However, cameras are being fought in Sacramento because the majority constituency is drivers.

  • M.

    IF their appeal doesn’t win and IF they do what employers do like cover liability for their employees and pay payroll taxes.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

SFMTA Proposes New Car Restrictions, Extended Bus Lanes on Lower Market

|
Last week, the SFMTA presented its proposal to ban private auto drivers from turning onto Market Street, between Third and Eighth Streets. The move would be complemented with extended transit-only lanes, plus a new system of wayfinding signs aimed at keeping drivers off of Market. The new plans, named “Safer Market Street,” would be implemented over nearly a […]

SFMTA Approves 2nd Street Protected Bike Lane Redesign, Ponders Car Bans

|
The SFMTA Board of Directors yesterday unanimously approved a redesign of Second Street which will remove traffic lanes and add safety upgrades like raised, protected bike lanes and sidewalk extensions. After years of delay, SFMTA Board members and some attendees at the meeting said it may not go far enough, and that the agency should consider car restrictions […]

Signs of Lax Enforcement of Car Restrictions on Market Street

|
Nearly two weeks in, the bans preventing private auto drivers from turning on to most of lower Market Street have, by all accounts, made the street safer and more efficient. But at an SFMTA Board of Directors meeting this week, member Gwyneth Borden noted that officers posted on Market “don’t seem to be as vigilant as one might like,” […]