SPUR Talk: Strategies for San Francisco’s Second Biggest Park

A hike designed to solicit input about improvements to McLaren Park. Photo: SF Rec and Parks
A hike designed to solicit input about improvements to McLaren Park. Photo: SF Rec and Parks

“How many of you have been to McLaren Park?” asked Dawn Kamalanathan of San Francisco Recreation and Parks to kick off a discussion yesterday at SPUR’s Urban Center in downtown San Francisco about the future of San Francisco’s second-largest recreational facility.

Nearly everyone in the audience raised their hands. But, of course, that was just selection-bias–people who have an interest in coming to a talk about McLaren Park are likely also people who have visited it.

“It’s very unusual for me to be in a room where 95 percent of the people have been to McLaren Park,” said Kamalanathan. In fact, she pointed out in the presentation, even most people who use facilities on one edge of the park or another tend to be unaware of the park’s great expanse. The normal response to the question is “where is McLaren Park?” she said.

Jake Gilchrist and Dawn Kamalanathan at the SPUR event on McLaren Park. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick
Jake Gilchrist and Dawn Kamalanathan at the SPUR event on McLaren Park. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick

McLaren Park is “313 acres of awesome,” she added. In fact, this park, in the Southeast of San Francisco, is bordered by the Excelsior, Visitacion Valley, and Crocker-Amazon neighborhoods. But it’s handicapped. It has an irregular shape, it’s often joined to nearby neighborhoods behind steep hills, and it’s far away from business corridors–all making it less accessible than Golden Gate. Jake Gilchrist, also with the San Francisco Recreation and Parks department, said local businesses don’t see the park as a draw, probably because it is several blocks from commercial corridors on Mission and Geneva. “There are people who don’t feel like the park is even an asset for their neighborhood.”

The good news is thanks to 2012’s Clean and Safe Neighborhood Park Bond, the city has $12 million for improvements to McLaren. The first step in figuring out how to spend that money, according to Gilchrist and Kamalanathan, was to hear from the neighborhoods and figure out a plan. That said, they have some guiding principles–among them is not to try to emulate Golden Gate.

“Golden Gate is more formal … with sand dunes that were transformed into a gorgeous park. On the other end of the spectrum is McLaren, which is very casual, less about looking, and more about visiting–it’s San Francisco’s natural habitat conserved,” said Kamalanathan. “We want to maintain that contrast.” She said the idea is to make the park more accessible, but also to make it feel as if visitors have escaped to a natural environment. “We are hearing across the environmental movement … about a nature deficit disorder–kids and families are being separated from nature.”

Rather than holding large community meetings and getting feedback–although they’re doing some of that–Gilchrist and Kamalanathan’s approach is to set up activities, introduce people to the park, and then get their reflections. Because of the park’s great expanse and peoples’ lack of knowledge of it “just having meetings and putting up fliers wasn’t going to work,” said Kamalanathan. So they arrange events such as treasure hunts and nature walks with local schools and groups. From that, they built a mailing list of some 2,000 people.

McNab Lakein McLaren Park. Photo: SF Rec & Parks
McNab Lake in McLaren Park. Photo: SF Rec & Parks

They discovered that safety is a big issue keeping people out of the park. But it isn’t that the park is dangerous in a criminal sense, explained the presenters. Because of poor signage and wayfinding, and a lack of visual cues, it’s just too easy to get lost. Most people never even go into the park “…unless someone else introduces you, and then you can get lost–it’s not clear how to move through the park and have a predictable experience,” explained Kamalanathan. The other problem is about getting the ball rolling: since people are deterred from wandering around by the lack of wayfinding, the result is the park is relatively empty. People get nervous in an empty park. “So when we talk about safety, it’s not just … enforcement, it’s readability, to know how to enter and exit the park and how to read the park.”

So what to do about it? The department wants to start with the well-utilized facilities near the edges, to use them as gateways to connecting trails deeper into the park. “We have these gateways, such as the tennis courts,” said Gilchrist.

There’s also the Louis Sutter Playground and the Herz Playground. By adding wayfinding and signage, and improving paths, they can use these familiar “neighborhood parks” (which are really just part of McLaren) to encourage people to explore more of the park and discover its connections. They might then add a family camp ground, for example, further inside. Kamalanathan sees an opportunity to get more city dwellers started on camping and communing with nature. By starting them off close to home, “if something goes wrong at 3 a.m., you go home, no problem,” said Kamalanathan.

Key to making McLaren Park more vibrant and available is improved way finding so people can find things such as the bench on Philosophers Way. Photo: Rec & Parks.
Key to making McLaren Park more vibrant and available is improved wayfinding so people can find things such as the bench on Philosophers Way. Photo: Rec & Parks.

The SPUR audience acted as an ad-hoc outreach meeting. Many made it clear that they don’t want the park to become commercialized. The parks department made it clear they don’t intend to let that happen. “We don’t need more artisanal pizza or coffee,” said Kamalanathan.

So what’s the timeline for all this? Some “low hanging fruit” is already completed or underway. Think of the new bike lanes opened earlier this year. As to the larger game plan, Kamalanathan said they’re looking at having the final meetings in the fall. It will take another year for design, and then construction should near completion around Nov. 2019.

audience
A SPUR Audience of McLaren Park fans. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick

For more events like these, visit SPUR’s events page.

  • heynow

    Interesting that there is no mention at all about all the neighbors in the community who have been working hard for years to support and advocate for the McLaren. They come in and ask our opinion and do their surveys and invite us to meetings but in the end Rec and Park has an agenda and don’t really care about those of us who live here and know and love and care for this park.

  • goodmaab

    They did not mention in the article a critical issue raised in regards to the impacts of growth in the district and that was public mass transit access to lessen the auto impact. SPUR missed this also with the ocean beach masterplan southern portion where they could have shown a more robust mass transit coordinated effort to link the L line up sloat or out the Westside of sunset Blvd. the need to envision Mclaren if it’s to remain wild is to protect and ensure people get there with a mass transit option like Geneva harney as a light rail vehicle line from the india basin area back up to balboa park station…

  • Rob W

    McLaren Park is filled with overgrown weeds everywhere. It’s a fire hazard and is littered with trash. as a matter a fact, there was just a grassfire there a few days ago. You speaks and envision a natural habitat but where the plants? I never even seen a sprinklers working. The barbecue on the northeast sites is also filled with tall dry weeds, We don’t need signs. What we needs is maintenance. Have you been there lately?

  • ZA_SF

    Do something about the criminals who break into parked cars or ditch dead bodies there, and you will have improved McLaren Park 100%.

  • Steep Ravine

    You have mislabeled McNab in the picture. That’s actually the upper reservoir – McNab is down below, due east of the reservoir.

  • Benny B

    well of course they don’t care. spur’s mission is to change the politics of the bay area by changing who lives here. they don’t care about “the people” one bit. a pity the “press” doesn’t realize this.

  • Montyedits

    What a ridiculous joke. We going to have a ‘lovely’ park that brings in more people so that more cars can get broken into, more people can spend the whole time dodging idiots on dirt bikes, even more trash everywhere (if thats possible) and a pond that gets diseased quicker. Does someone also want to point out that the park doesn’t get used as much because the weather is usually pretty crappy during summer. They will build all these new facilities and when the money runs out will move onto the next project. We will be left with a bunch of facilities that get stolen, burnt, broken and covered in paint. How about spending the money on more policing for the park, taking care of the rubbish thats routinely dumped there and dare I say adding a few more water fountains.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

This Week in Livable Streets Events

|
This week, the Board of Supervisors questions the mayor on the next SFMTA chief, city staffers discuss Market Street, and three walking tours explore parks and parklets. Here are the highlights from the Streetsblog calendar: Tuesday: The SF Board of Supervisors meets. Supervisors will ask the Mayor Ed Lee questions regarding the next SFMTA Executive Director, […]

The Lure of the Creeks Buried Beneath San Francisco’s Streets

|
Islais Creek Channel. Photo: Matt Baume (Editor’s note: This is Part 2 in a 3-part series on the Bay Area watershed.) San Francisco may be getting new waterfront soon, thanks to ambitious projects currently being studied by the city’s Public Utilities Commission, including proposals for daylighting, or uncovering, long-buried creeks and streams and creating open-air […]
sblog_calendar_cookie

This Week: McLaren Park, Transportation Safety, South of Market

|
Here are this week’s highlights from the Streetsblog calendar: Wednesday Exploring McLaren Park. The second-largest park in San Francisco is undergoing a community engagement process to better understand how to spend $10 million in improvement funding. Join SPUR to explore the park and discuss how it can be enhanced. Wednesday, Feb. 15, 10 a.m. Meeting details […]