Will the Board of Supervisors Betray the Market/Octavia Plan on Tuesday?

marketoctaviacorner.jpgThe Board of Supervisors on Tuesday will hear an appeal against more parking in Market/Octavia area.

After nearly ten years of community planning and a rigorous review process that resulted in a model community plan encouraging transit-oriented development, density, and strategic parking limits, a developer in the Market and Octavia Neighborhood Plan (PDF) area has asked for a special exception to the parking limit so they can sell condos to mostly wealthy people. 

Sound ridiculous?  Not to the Planning Commission, which unanimously supported the developer’s request for a conditional use (CU) variance at 299 Valencia Street in November of 2008.  In response, the Hayes Valley Neighborhood Association (HVNA), Livable City, the Mission Anti-Displacement Coalition, and the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition have appealed the Planning Department’s decision.

From the HVNA appeal (PDF):

Neither planning staff nor the project sponsor provided evidence that
the CU is necessary, desirable, or compatible.  Instead, the project
sponsor explicitly stated at the Nov 6th 2008 Planning Commission
hearing that the request for a CU for increased parking was necessary
to market the new housing units to higher-end buyers. 

The Board of Supervisors will hear arguments for and against the CU tomorrow at 4pm in the Board of Supervisors auditorium at City Hall.  Readers are encouraged to attend the hearing and speak in favor of the appeal.

Photo: Planning Department

  • Jeffrey W. Baker

    It is burdensome to always need vigilance against planning commission stupidity. It might be nice to live in a city, someday, where the planning commission and the land use and planning subcommittee of the board of supervisors mainly takes rational actions, rather than the one we have now which constantly acts against the interests of the public.

    I had my own similar encounter with the board last year, when the land use subcommittee voted (1-0) to establish permit parking in a C-3-S zoning block, within the boundaries of the transbay redevelopment district. The prevailing argument which swayed the supervisor was that permit parking must be established, otherwise families with children would move out of the city. That is the level of rhetoric to which our government is susceptible.

  • Any way we can add written comment, for those of us who can’t physically attend?

  • Besides, of course, contacting your Supervisor here:


  • Peter

    us livable streets folks should start blaring that ‘children and families’ song at every chance we get.

    “But why is Supervisor ‘X’ against families and children? Does s/he hate children? Then why not make this crosswalk safer?”

  • I find myself tuning out many SFBC alerts because no effort is made to represent the claims and reasoning of the opposition. Credibility and depth are gained when an effort is made to accurately perceive the point of view of the opposition. My tune out filter kicks at the first sign of polarized refusal to understand rational arguments on the other side. If their arguments aren’t rational, expose the fact at least summarily.

    SFBC too seldom and too shallowly contemplates the views of those who oppose us. Screw that.

  • Decker:

    What are you referring to? This article had nothing to do with the SFBC (though the SFBC endorsed this proposal and I am a neighbor and SFBC staff who spoke out in favor of the appeal)…

    …and Why would you be upset that an organization isn’t spending their member’s time and email inbox space explaining a contrary point of view…?


Despite Skewed Parking Math, Planning Commission Approves 55 Laguna

The SF Planning Commission unanimously approved a major housing development at 55 Laguna Street yesterday, despite an excessive amount of car parking that livable streets advocates say should be lowered under stricter parking maximums. The development would include two housing projects: one with 330 apartments, and another with 110 affordable apartments for an LGBT senior community. […]

SF Board of Supervisors Land Use and Economic Development Committee Meeting

Agenda [PDF] Of note: 1. Planning Code - Amending Inclusionary Housing Ordinance to Add NewAlternative in Market and Octavia Plan Area 2. Hearing - Municipal Transportation Agency Regarding Efficiency Improvements to J-Church Light Rail Vehicle Line Service 6. Transportation Code - Car Share Vehicle Parking Restrictions 7. Planning Code - Inner Clement, Outer Clement, and Geary Neighborhood […]

SFMTA Proposes Short-Term Safety Upgrades for Octavia Boulevard

Ten years after Octavia Boulevard opened in the footprint of the former Central Freeway, the SFMTA has proposed a package of short-term safety fixes for people walking and biking, especially along the cross streets. The upgrades could be implemented by the end of 2016. Proposals in the works include a bike lane on eastbound Page Street, a […]

Advocates Ask Supes to Support a Two-Way Hayes

Advocates are calling for all livable streets supporters who have the time to turn out to the Board of Supervisors’ Land Use and Economic Development Committee meeting today at 1pm to voice their support for a two-way Hayes Street, as was called for in the Market and Octavia Plan.  In 2007, the Hayes Valley Neighborhood […]