Do San Francisco’s Historic Streetcars Keep Muni Stuck in the Past?

2201589840_00fd0da8ac.jpgFlickr photo: Telstar Logistics

Don’t get me wrong, I love San Francisco’s historic streetcars. I have ridden them often and can appreciate the nostalgic bumpy rides, even more so if I don’t have to stand, and can grab a seat and peer outside the small windows.  But when I saw Rachel Gordon’s story in the Chronicle this week about how Muni plans to renovate Streetcar Number One for $1.9 million it really got me thinking: In these tight budgetary times, is that really where we want to be investing our precious transit dollars?

According to the MTA, the money for the project is a mix of capital dollars:
local funds (sales taxes) as well as state and federal grants, and it had been set aside for vehicle restoration. Fine, but how about this question:

"Why should San Franciscans only experience public transit’s past? What
if we were to also show people what public transit’s future looks like?" asked Tom Radulovich, director of Livable City and a member of the BART Board of Directors. "I don’t want this to be a transit museum. I want this to be a city where transit actually works."

Why, Radulovich asks, couldn’t the MTA invest in some modern low-floor trams, like in Milan, Italy, that would carry greater volumes of people, especially during peak hours, when the historic F-line streetcars are often jammed because of the overcrowded LRVs on Muni Metro? He said the historics also interfere with bus movement. Despite the costs of the modern trams, Radulovich said it’s an issue advocates have been talking about.

66423784_dd4cf486ca.jpgA modern low-floor tram in Milan, Italy. Flickr photo: martin97uk

"During rush hour you’d run high capacity cars that would move people along and then you’d run historics as well. And if you really want to ride the historic you could wait for the historic and go or if you were just interested in the car that was going to get you there or you were in, say a wheelchair, you’d have the modern low-floor cars that would supplement the historic service."

Under that scenario, the modern trams could run with the old streetcars on Market Street and the Embarcadero.  Another option would be to only run the historic streetcars along the waterfront, from Aquatic Park to the Giants ballpark, or initiate the much talked about G-line that would provide historic streetcar service to Golden Gate Park from the N-Judah line.

Is all this just another San Francisco transit fantasy? Quite possibly, said Rick Laubscher, president of the Market Street Railway, who fiercely defended the historic streetcars as a big attraction for Muni, a service riders consistently tell him they love. He said it’s the most successful, patronized, traditional streetcar line in the U.S.

"Over the course of many years there have been some assumptions that because these are so attractive to people, they must somehow be wrong, they must somehow be more expensive, they must somehow be something we shouldn’t have because it must be a guilty pleasure," said Laubscher.

Comparatively, Laubscher says Muni is getting more bang for its buck because the old streetcars last longer than the Breda light-rail vehicles and the buses. "They built those cars well back then." He also argues the historics have the capacity of a standard bus. Instead of limiting the service and adding modern trams, he would rather see, for example, a car-free Market Street, and ticket machines installed at stops to speed up boarding.

"Before you do anything to cannibalize one form of transit for another form of transit we should be looking to reduce automobile use. We should by start by enforcing the lanes that area already there," he said. Cars illegally using the bus and taxi lanes in San Francisco cause significant transit delays and over time cost Muni millions of dollars.

He said if we’re going to talk about modern trams for Muni he’d like to see the discussion widen: "Why don’t we really open up this dialogue and call for the complete overhaul of the subway, including the Central Subway, and do it to run with Eurotrams?"

Indeed, Radulovich would love to see modern trams replace all the Bredas, which are heavy and costly to maintain.

"If you’re going to run streetcars why not run streetcars that are accessible and can actually carry a large volume of people? Streetcars on Market Street was really a great thing, and people enjoy them, but I think people might also enjoy the nice modern low-floor cars."

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

MTA Director Heinicke Questions Use of Streetcar Rehab Funds

|
Flickr photo: Ame Otoko It may be a moot point now that funds are allocated, but MTA Director Malcolm Heinicke today questioned whether the MTA should be spending $18.7 million to enter into an agreement with Brookville Equipment Corporation to refurbish 16 historic streetcars. Some of his comments seemed to echo a Streetsblog piece a […]

Commentary: Why This Working Family is Supporting Muni Reform

|
Editor’s note: On Friday, we presented an op-ed opposing Prop G. Today, Gillian Gillett, a transit advocate who is the chair of SPUR’s Transportation Committee, explains why she’s voting for Prop G. Living in San Francisco provides families with many unique opportunities for learning, entertainment, and other benefits of a diverse, urban environment. However, families […]

This Week in Livable Streets Events

|
This week, get an update on the F-Line extension to Fort Mason, speak up at the final hearing on the JFK Bikeway, and enjoy Sunday Streets in the Mission. Here are the highlights from the Streetsblog calendar:  Monday: PUBLIC Book Talk: How Women Rode the Bicycle to Freedom. Join author Sue Macy at PUBLIC Bikes for a […]