Tea Partying and Beanbagging on Shotwell

tea_kettle_6475.jpg24th and Shotwell Tea Party

The citywide Stand Against Sit Lie campaign Saturday March 27 was a big success by all accounts. The website claims over 100 events took place on San Francisco sidewalks, and over 1000 people participated. That doesn’t sound overwhelming at first glance, but if you recall that this began as a brainstorm in a bar just a couple of weeks ago, and relied heavily on Facebook and personal networking, it is an impressive beginning.

Mayor Gavin Newsom, Police Chief George Gascón, and the S.F. Chronicle suburban-values attack-dog C.W. Nevius have been drumming up an Astroturf grassroots effort to criminalize sitting on sidewalks. The focus has been the Haight-Ashbury, where there are actual homeowners who have been contributing their energy to this effort. The joke at our 24th and Shotwell sit-in was that these same upscale homeowners in the Haight have been trying for over 30 years to “clean up” Haight Street. They had an organization for a while in the 1980s called RAD (Residents Against Druggies) and you could reliably buy pot or acid by looking for them, and then seeking the cluster of dealers who trailed them around the neighborhood!

Anyway, these folks, egged on by the powers-that-be, are clamoring for a new law to give police carte blanche to evict anyone they want to from the neighborhood’s sidewalks. The proposed ordinance is drawn very broadly, allowing for police to accost anyone on any sidewalk in the city and fine them and, if there’s a second offense, have them jailed for 30 days. This is being promoted as a means to enhance public safety, despite the fact that there are already laws against blocking sidewalks and aggressive panhandling. It’s unclear what purpose this new ordinance is supposed to fulfill, other than a new tool of arbitrary power for the police to use against “undesirable” populations.

Our group gathered at 24th and Shotwell as part of the citywide effort to say no to this proposed law. My partner Adriana organized it as a Tea Party, matching similar efforts near Buena Vista Park and elsewhere. We also put out some mats and a beanbag toss game, along with cake and tea. You really can’t imagine how fun it is to connect with passersby and neighbors on a local sidewalk until you try it out. First the Palestinian store owner came out wondering why we were there. He loved our tea since it tasted like ‘Arab tea’!

adri_and_wolf_6472.jpgAdriana and Wolf discuss public life.

Our first “guest” was Wolf, a longtime resident of the Mission, a self-acknowledged dope fiend who had done a couple of long stints in jail. His dark leathery skin confirmed his years of living on the street. His mother was a Mission district Italian and his father a Mexican from New Mexico, and he had the distinction of being an American who was deported from Mexico after six years in Guadalajara. He was quite the beanbag tosser too! A white homeless friend of Wolf’s asked, “Just tell me this. “Why can white people sit on tables in front of cafés without being harassed? I don’t cause any trouble here. I’m just enjoying the street too.”

Adriana invited Spanish speakers to stop for tea, while various friends slowly began to gather. I spoke for a while with a British visitor who was walking his host’s dog. He couldn’t believe anyone would want to curb street life, since that was so much of why he and others wanted to visit San Francisco. A young French woman appeared in overalls a few doors down, emerging from her new gardening effort in the backyard. I hailed her and invited her for tea, explaining what we were doing. She too was aghast at the notion that San Francisco would restrict life on the streets this way. Both of them were quick to emphasize that safe streets are crowded streets.

beanbagging_6481.jpgBeanbagging fun on Shotwell.

Of course, the unspoken argument of the Sit-Lie proponents is that there are normative behaviors that must be conformed to. It’s not a problem to be on the sidewalks as long as you’re moving along in the endless process of shopping. It’s stopping to engage in activities that are economically purposeless, that actually animate a public life, that create the serendipitous and unpredictable moments and connections that give city life its strong appeal—those are the activities that must be “curbed.” There are three acceptable reasons to be in public space: working, commuting, shopping. If you’re not doing those things, go home and watch TV. That’s the American Way of Life. Earlier in the week, Adriana asked a local beat cop his opinion about the Sit/Lie initiative. He responded that it was a terrible idea. “Just another way in which a community avoids dealing with a grave social issue by having police move undesired people out of sight. It doesn’t solve the problem.”

We spoke with several dozen people during the three hours we occupied the sidewalk. A couple of local DPW street workers hung out with us and had some cake, played some beanbag. Part of their job is to shoo street people along, so they were sympathetic to the opposition to the proposed law. Two neighborhood  homies, Little George and Rigo, spend a lot of time on the corner, and they were delighted that we were staking it out as public space. Elderly Latinas were quite supportive. One woman, Carmela, came up to us and became quite animated. She told a long story about losing her son —7 years of duty in the army followed by 17 years of duty as a postal worker—who died after being hit by a car. She had earlier lost her husband, a sibling and her parents, but the loss of her adult son sent her into a tailspin of despair. “The loss of a son is like no other loss.” She would go out to the street day after day, sitting on stoops and sidewalks. She imagined people thought she was insane, but she needed to walk, to sit in the sun, to be on the street to heal her pain. “You don’t know what pain people carry in their hearts, only they know. I went to the streets to carry mine.”

A posse of cyclists stopped by, including Sue King who is one of the coordinators of Sunday Streets. She complained that we were engaging in a somewhat misguided effort since the asphalt-covered streets (as opposed to the limited space of the sidewalks) were a huge common space that we should be working to re-purpose. Of course she’s right, but the deeper problem is that we’ve already been put on the defensive AGAIN. So much of what passes for “progressive” politics in San Francisco is actually opposing pro-privatization, pro-business, pro-police initiatives. A forward agenda of urban transformation, whether motivated by the Transition Town logic driven by peak oil and climate change, or just the desire to make us more self-reliant and resilient, remains absent from the political landscape. Local activists continually fall into the trap of calling for “jobs” without any discussion of what kind of work SHOULD be done.
Demanding jobs in the absence of a broad agenda of ecological
transformation based on mutual aid and a solidarity economy is to
reinforce the logic that trapped us in the first place.

22nd_and_Valencia_6483.jpg22nd and Valencia.

That’s the beauty of opening a public space, even for just a few hours. Across the city, dozens of conversations took place, new friendships were forged, and political networks that might go a lot further in the future started to find themselves. At 24th and Shotwell, we didn’t hear a negative word from anyone until we were wrapping it up. A half dozen young hipsters were entering the apartment building we had been sitting in front of. I asked them if they knew about the proposed ordinance. They hesitated, and then one said, “you know, I actually would support something like that. I’m sick of these guys out here at 4 a.m. drunk, puking, yelling at each other.” It was a telling moment. Here were 20-somethings who thought another law was somehow going to remove undesirable people from their sidewalk, as opposed to a well-resourced campaign of public housing and social services. I pointed out that there were already laws against public drunkenness and a young woman said, “we call the police but they don’t show up.” So, passing another law is going to change that?

karaoke_on_Valencia_6485.jpgKaraoke erupts at corner of Hill and Valencia.

  • patrick

    peternatural, perhaps you should realize that not everybody is like you. Perhaps you should also realize that people have been physically assaulted there, on a number of occasions, in recent history.

    Opponents of sit/lie are welcome to deny that there’s a problem, just realize you will not change the mind of any supporter of sit/lie by denying the existence of the very reason they support it.

  • patrick –

    So much of what you said is just not reflective of the discussion here and your claims have mostly already been addressed. I could try to respond by just copying and pasting the answers, but it’s really not worth the work after already having gone through so much debate already. I can only guess you haven’t thoroughly read it, you’re forgetting or dismissing things, and/or misinterpreting things.

  • Blind in the Sunset

    I am not sure if I am 100% for or against this new measure. My gut tells me we don’t necessarily need another law on the books when law enforcement does not necessarily enforce the laws we do have, i.e. parking on sidewalks, moving violations, etc.

    Just as everyone who reads this blog wants free flowing traffic on the streets, many of us want free flowing traffic on sidewalks. I am blind and walk with a white cane. Do you have any idea how annoying it is to try to navigate around sidewalk furniture at cafes that is placed in the middle of a sidewalk and not up against the restaurant? How about the folks who think it is okay to sit on the steps near MUNI entrances on Market Street? Do you have any idea how annoying it is to navigate around crowds of people smoking outside of a bar or restaurant? How many times do you think I have crashed into a poorly placed newspaper box or utility pole placed near an intersection or on a pedestrian island in the middle of busy street like Geary? Do you realize how dangerous it is if I am forced to step off the curb into traffic to avoid obstacles such as garbage or construction without proper detours? Add that to the hedges, planters, and low hanging tree branches that are not trimmed. This is on top of the fact that I have been scared and threatened by unsavory characters on many streets here in the city.

    San Francisco wants a real “pedestrian lifestyle” but take the time to think of everyone who uses the sidewalks. Get off the soapbox already.

  • patrick

    Aaron, I was simply responding to your personal attack: “What I mean is by declaring, however biased the tone of an article may be, that you are unable to form your own opinion”

    Of course I didn’t declare any such thing, that’s just your interpretation of my statements. What I actually said is that although I’m of mixed feelings on the subject, the tone of the article was pushing me towards supporting sit/lie.

    You seem to have plenty of time to make attacks against me and other, so I find it strange that you don’t have time to post the details of your arguments in a clear and simple manner.

    I’ll go ahead and post the facts from my point of view.

    There are individuals and/or groups of people who can sometimes be aggressive and even dangerous, who are commonly founded siting and/or laying on the side walk in certain parts of San Francisco.
    They monopolize public space for extended periods of time.
    They obstruct the free flow of people trying to walk on the streets.

    A proposed solution is the sit/lie ordinance. Another proposed solution is more beat cops. These are not mutually exclusive, we could have sit/lie along with more beat cops, or either one individually. There are probably other solutions, I have not heard them in this discussion.

  • those dudes

    i’m inclined to agree with the many commenters who have noted that the proposed sit/lie law is too broad and its stated goals could be acheived through enforcement of existing laws. but a suggestion to streetsblog – in order to maintain credibility, posts such as this should be clearly presented as op-eds, rather than as quasi-objective policy analysis.

  • Stephen

    What frustrates me about these discussions in san Francisco is that how readily people just write problems off as “part of city life”. San Francisco has a homeless problem. I live in the mission and I really do not like having addicts and other sick people using the sidewalk as their toilet and trash can.

    Now, the homeless problem can be significantly alleviated by a so-called comprehensive housing approach: public housing, combined with treatment and casework will get most people off the streets. But this also mug be combined with rules that make it illegal for people to live on the streets. We can house them and provide them services, but we shouldn’t have people living on the street. Sit/lie is a part of this. And in my opinion a necessary part. sadly san Franciscans, and this includes the so-called activist community, aren’t willing or interested in paying for this solution. We’d rather talk past eah other with one side insistng that people be able to do as they please and that the homeless have a right to live on the street. The other side seems to favor the all-stick approach of just shipping people out of town.

  • Krysten Whitby

    Fantastic commentary . BTW if people have been needing a IRS 1120-RIC , my wife filled a template form here http://goo.gl/QpGn4w


Jane Martin is a Force of Nature

Jane Martin gardening at 23rd and Harrison, Jan. 3, 2009. Jane Martin is a longtime resident of San Francisco’s Mission District, a licensed architect, and an avid gardener. She is the founder of PlantSF, an informational website dedicated to reconfiguring the design and use of urban spaces, primarily sidewalks and to a lesser extent, residential […]

Standing Up to Sit-Lie

Hippies and punks have been sitting on Haight Street for almost a half century. Will they soon be criminals? (Photo: Greg Gaar Collection, via http://foundsf.org) As San Francisco moves closer to a decision on a new sit-lie ordinance that proponents say would facilitate the SFPD’s clearing of unsavory elements off of sidewalks in neighborhoods like […]

Mission Greenbelt Zig-Zags Across the Neighborhood

Amber Hasselbring is the instigator of a lovely effort in San Francisco’s Mission District, aptly named the Mission Greenbelt Project. The plan is to create a connective corridor of native plants to serve as wildlife habitat between Dolores Park (Dolores and 19th streets) and Franklin Square Park (Bryant and 17th streets). The first planting was […]

Safer, More Transit-Friendly Streets Planned for the Upper Haight

Update 4/10: The Planning Department posted an online survey where you can weigh in on the design proposal for upper Haight Street. The Planning Department has drawn up early plans for three of the Haight-Ashbury’s major streets: upper Haight Street, Stanyan Street, and the southern end of Masonic Avenue. The proposals for the Haight Ashbury […]

Latest Haight Street Plans Replace Most Stop Signs to Speed Up Muni

The Planning Department has an online survey about the Haight Street proposals, available until July 3. City planners recently presented their latest plans for Haight Street, which include two overlapping projects from two agencies. The Haight-Ashbury Public Realm Plan is the Planning Department’s effort to expand sidewalks and add aesthetic treatments along the Upper Haight […]