Redwood City Interchange Could Get More Dangerous for Walking and Biking

Redwood City’s Woodside Road interchange at Highway 101 has no infrastructure for people to cross by bike or on foot. Photo: Google Maps

Redwood City has begun environmental review on a planned reconstruction of the Highway 101 interchange at Woodside Road, as well as two major intersections on either side of the highway — projects designed to move more cars. Some of the proposed designs would retain existing traffic ramps that are hazardous to people walking and bicycling, and Woodside and Broadway Street would both be widened.

“That’s where the fatalities are, especially with truck drivers,” said Redwood City resident Matthew Self. “These are the high-risk points where cars are speeding up to freeway speeds.”

Alternatively, a design favored by bicycle and pedestrian safety advocates would replace all the on-ramps and off-ramps with large signalized intersections. All of the proposed designs include two multi-use paths, one sidewalk, and bike lanes.

City and county transportation officials say the $60 to $90 million highway expansion project is needed to “alleviate existing and projected peak hour traffic congestion” in the area. If the project is approved, the interchange would carry more cars with new traffic lanes, intersections, bridges, and possibly a tunnel on Woodside.

“The project purpose is to alleviate existing and projected peak hour traffic congestion in the area, and to enhance mobility and safety,” said Scott Kelsey, Senior Transportation Manager for URS, the consulting firm hired by Redwood City to guide the project through the required environmental reviews. “There’s also the lack of adequate bicycle and pedestrian accommodations, we are going to fix that too.”

Alternative_3_from_2011_Traffic_Study
“Alternative 3,” favored by safety advocates because it replaces traffic ramps with signalized intersections, was one of five designs recommended by a 2011 traffic study. Image: SMCTA

Currently, the half-mile stretch of Woodside that crosses under Highway 101 connects to six different traffic ramps connecting to the highway, creating dangerous conditions for people on bikes as well as pedestrians who cross the ramps. No sidewalks, crosswalks, or bike lanes have been installed.

Woodside is acknowledged by Redwood City’s 2010 General Plan to be “one of the most significant barriers to pedestrian and bicycle travel. Lack of sidewalks, lack of safe crossings, and high vehicle volumes and speeds are inconvenient, present safety concerns, and discourage pedestrians and bicyclists from traveling along or across Woodside Road.”

Despite the General Plan’s first Circulation Element [PDF] policy to “…reduce vehicle trip generation and vehicle miles traveled,” all of the designs would substantially increase capacity for motor vehicle traffic through the interchange by adding lanes to Woodside and Broadway, and by replacing the intersection at Woodside and Veterans Boulevard with new bridges over Woodside that would connect directly to Highway 101.

A cross-section diagram of a widened Woodside Road under Highway 101, with eight traffic lanes, two bike lanes, and one multi-use path. Today there are six traffic lanes under the highway. Image: SMCTA

“The flyover [bridges over Woodside] address a major movement of traffic at the interchange itself which is northbound Highway 101 to northbound Veterans Boulevard and the reverse trip, so it offers a major traffic congestion relief component,” said URS Transportation Engineer Paul Krupra.

Each of the four alternatives [PDF] recommended by URS to be studied in the project’s environmental impact report would widen Woodside from four to six lanes for most of its length between Blomquist Street and Bay Road, and widen it to eight lanes underneath Highway 101. Plus eight lanes for motor vehicle traffic, there is space for one sidewalk, one multi-use path, and bike lanes to Woodside without reconstructing the Highway 101 bridge overhead. Another multi-use path would be built along the Union Pacific rail line between Veterans and Seaport Boulevard just west of the interchange, allowing people walking and bicycling to cross Highway 101 while avoiding Woodside Road altogether.

“It’s really critical that the Union Pacific path is an integral part of the design, so that we’re not told to go get money elsewhere,” said John Langbein, a local bicycle advocate, at a community meeting  in November.

Union Pacific Railroad tracks under Highway 101, from Veteran Blvd
This paved path would be extended along the Union Pacific rail line that passes under Highway 101, allowing people walking and biking to cross the highway without using Woodside Road. Photo: Google Maps

While street safety advocates welcome the car-free option provided by the new off-street path, any proposal that doesn’t address the hazardous traffic ramps that connect to 101 would keep the highway crossing unusable for most people who live and work nearby and travel by bike or on foot.

“Preferred consideration should be given to Alternative 3, since it does not include any high-speed ramps,” wrote the Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition in a December 16 comment letter [PDF]. “High-speed ramps are not compatible with Pedestrian Enhanced Design,” the letter stated, in reference to “Policy BE-25.5 of the Circulation Element of the Redwood City General Plan (2010).”

“To be safe for bicyclists,” the letter continued, “the interchange design must not include any high-speed on-ramps or off-ramps. There is no way for bicyclists to cross these ramps safely. Multiple bicycle fatalities have occurred at nearby interchanges with high-speed ramps, including a 2010 fatality at 280-Alpine Rd. on a high-speed ramp that is similar to what is proposed for the northbound 101 on-ramp in Alternative 3A.”

Alternatives 3A (a roundabout on Woodside on the north side of Highway 101), 3B (a tunnel for Woodside to pass under Broadway), and 8B (a new “Diverging Diamond” design), would all include high-speed traffic ramps, including two-lane on-ramps.

“It’s extremely dangerous [for bicyclists] to have to cross two lanes of traffic making a right turn to get on the freeway,” said resident Marc Beban.

Caltrans staff collected scoping comments on the project’s EIR through December 20. The consulting team expects to present a Draft EIR in August 2015 and a Final EIR by January 2016.  The interchange could then be constructed as early as 2021 if the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA) chooses to fund it, and grants from state and federal sources are secured.

  • thielges

    Don’t Caltrans DD-64 and California’s <AB 1358 require that there be routine accommodation for bicyclists and pedestrians when Caltrans roadways are remodeled?

  • sebra leaves

    Why would anybody want to cross a freeway or be anywhere near a freeway entrance or exit unless they were in a car or truck? Freeways are made for fast moving motor vehicles, not pedestrians and cyclists.

  • Bruce

    Yes, they do. That’s what sustainable transportation advocates have been using to push for a bike lane on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge.

  • Bruce

    I don’t so much mind the diverging diamond version (Alternative 8B). It places bike and pedestrian traffic on a dedicated path in the middle of the underpass, and the points of conflict with auto traffic are (mostly) signalized.

  • 94110

    You’re absolutely right! Nobody wants to be.

    Pretty sure our views diverge after that.

  • murphstahoe

    I live on one side of a freeway.

    My job is on the other side of the freeway.

    QED.

  • Affen_Theater

    Redwood City has an online poll/survey out this week to help with their thinking about the Woodside/101/Broadway interchange design alternatives.

  • As a long time bicyclist, I believe that you can never make major arteries like Woodside Road or El Camino safe for bicyclists. Dedicated pedestrian / bike bridges or passageways across freeways are essential to ensure bicyclist safety. For example, the Union Pacific 101 underpass is a much preferred method to cross 101, than having a bike lane on the side of Woodside Road.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Budget Busting Interchange Expansions on Track Despite State Funding Cuts

|
Desperate to keep expanding San Mateo County’s highways for more auto traffic, the Transportation Authority (SMCTA)’s Board of Directors voted last week to advance $16.3 million in local highway funds to avoid delaying the construction of two major interchange reconstruction projects. County highway planners were counting on this year’s State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) to […]

San Mateo County Bike/Ped Safety Projects Starved for Funding

|
Despite growing demand for better walking and biking infrastructure in San Mateo County, active transportation grants from the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) cover only a fraction of the projects that cities want to build, leaving many residents without the sidewalks, bike lanes, and other basic ingredients they need to safely […]