Editorial: Stop Caltrans and Alameda County from Creating Another Pedestrian Hellscape

It's time to kill the Oakland Alameda 'Access Project' in Chinatown and Jack London Square

Don't worry cyclists, we're going to let you bike on both sides of the tunnel to hell. Image: Alameda County Transportation
Don't worry cyclists, we're going to let you bike on both sides of the tunnel to hell. Image: Alameda County Transportation

Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

The Oakland Alameda Access Project (OAAP) is an $83 million project, run by the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC), its HTNB consultants, and Caltrans that, if designed right, could help heal the gash created between Chinatown and Oakland’s waterfront by the Nimitz Freeway. Unfortunately, it is being run by retrograde traffic engineers who are only concerned with increasing car throughput.

Going by the latest plans, it is proceeding just like the last collaboration of the ACTC and Caltrans, the 23rd and 29th Street Oakland overpasses between Jingletown and Fruitvale, over the Nimtz freeway. In that case, they didn’t even build sidewalks on both sides of the bridges and basically banned walking through major parts of the projects (see image below). They striped the drainage pans and called them bike lanes, and then congratulated themselves on a “commitment to improving local communities” and providing “…new ways to connect, commute and commune that don’t require the use of a personal automobile.”

This Caltrans sign on 23rd Avenue in Oakland points to an imaginary crosswalk...and if you did get across, there's no sidewalk on the other side anyway. The same thinking that gave us this garbage is behind the OAAP designs. Photos: Streetsblog/Rudick
This Caltrans sign on 23rd Avenue in Oakland points to an imaginary crosswalk…and if you did get across, there’s no sidewalk on the other side anyway. The same thinking that gave us this garbage is behind the OAAP designs. Photos: Streetsblog/Rudick

The OAAP is following the same Orwellian pattern.

The ACTC and Caltrans team says it wants to address the “lack of pedestrian and bicycle connectivity” between Chinatown and Jack London Square. But, as with 23rd and 29th, they will remove crosswalks and sidewalk, this time at the intersections of Jackson and 5th and 6th Street. They plan to add landscaping to “discourage illegal pedestrian crossings” so people walking don’t interfere with the ramp they want to add from the tunnel to the freeway to increase car throughput to and from Western Alameda and its car-centric new developments.

They do plan to add a few disjointed bike lanes and other sops for cyclists, including a new ramp to the Posey Tube’s 3.4-foot maintenance catwalk/bike lane, which is currently the only way for a cyclist or pedestrian to get between Oakland and Western Alameda.

In fact, the lead image, taken directly from OAAP documents, pretty much says it all if you want to understand the degree to which the planners on this project don’t understand (or just don’t care about) bicycle and pedestrian safety.

No sane person jogs in the Posey tube. And nobody in their right mind would bike in it either, except that many cyclists simply have no choice. The traffic noise in the tunnel is as loud as a jet engine; the air is so dirty that if you wear a white t-shit it will be visibly sooty by the time you pass through; and the catwalks are so narrow that two cyclists can’t even pass each other, let alone ride alongside a jogger. It’s barely wide enough for a single bike’s handlebars.

Caltrans is under intense pressure from lawmakers to get with the program on complete streets, so they have to do something. In this case, the team assigned to this project promises to open the second catwalk on the opposite side of the tube, which is currently closed. It’s an obvious sop, but, in fairness, I suppose it will allow cyclists to choke to death or risk a fall on both sides of the tube.

This graffiti at the entrance to the Posey Tube walkway is on point. Photo: Streetsblog
This graffiti at the entrance to the Posey Tube walkway is on point. The OAAP team, not so much. Photo: Streetsblog

The planning team going through the motions of their legally required “community outreach” says it has conducted meetings with many groups, including my own homeowners association. My HOA President, Brendon Levitt, is a very smart, progressive architect who rides his bike to his office in Eastern Alameda. After over a year of fruitless, frustrating meetings and “updated” plans “to address stakeholder concerns” that don’t actually contain any changes, he wrote the following to the project team about their plans and a letter they sent to him (and me) earlier this month:

We are in receipt of the “updated” plans but were disappointed to see the degree to which our concerns were dismissed. In your letter you write, “as a result of your feedback,” in an attempt to make it appear as if our comments were considered. However, the actual design continues to ignore our feedback, including pedestrian and bicyclist safety, activation of the city streets, activation of the underpasses, traffic calming, lighting, and vegetation.

It’s clear that automobile throughput is the project’s priority. This comes at the expense of basic principles of urban design, let alone our health, safety, or community.

Some are sold on this project because it also involves tearing down the Broadway off-ramp, since that space will be needed to create the new ramp connecting the tunnels to the freeway. If properly implemented, that could help restore some of Chinatown’s street grid and keep some freeway-bound traffic off local streets.

But the OAAP team also wants to widen the Oak Street off-ramp to ensure that just as many cars continue to flow into Oakland at high speeds, just on a slightly different alignment, and at ground level instead of above grade. They refuse to even add a protected bike lane to 6th Street, which would become the defacto off-ramp, because it would “require the removal of parking spaces,” explained Dina Potter, a consultant on the project, during one of their outreach meetings. The painful irony is that the parking spaces that she’s refusing to give up on 6th don’t even exist yet, since that’s currently the location of the aerial Broadway off-ramp.

She added that people need their parking and “cyclists need to compromise.”

Either way, we don’t have to tear down the ramp to improve streets in Oakland’s Chinatown. Oakland’s Department of Transportation, which recently installed protected bike lanes around Lake Merritt’s BART station, have shown how, for pennies on the dollar, they can make make Chinatown’s streets far more pedestrian friendly and safe by adding the pedestrian bulb-outs and protected intersections seen below:

With shorter crossing distances and motorist forced to slow around turns, it's just easier to cross the street thanks to these protected intersections...done by Oakland DOT. But they do require some compromises with motorists. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick
With shorter crossing distances and motorist forced to slow around turns, it’s easier to cross the street thanks to these protected intersections…done by Oakland DOT. But they do require eliminating some dedicated turning lanes for cars and building infrastructure that forces motorist to take turns at a safe speed. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick

And if they want to improve the area right where the ramp is located, well, there are lots of places, even as close as Rockridge and San Francisco, where we’ve seen that these spaces under freeways and ramps don’t have to be filled exclusively with trash, parking lots, and muck. In fact, a project to light and activate the space under the freeway at Jack London Square continues to languish, thanks in large part to the recalcitrance of Caltrans.

Bike and safety advocates from Bike Walk Alameda and Bike East Bay, meanwhile, are working hard to eke out minor bike improvements on this project. But at some point we need to move beyond sops and minor improvements. We already have a giant freeway, wide, car-centric streets, massive inequities, and an epidemic of road violence. The time for compromise and “balancing needs” is over.

“The OAAP had a great opportunity to heal some of the wounds caused by the Nimitz Freeway,” wrote Levitt, in his email to the project team. “Instead, ACTC seeks to reinforce those problems, setting Oakland back in its attempts to create a vibrant city while encouraging Alameda’s dependence on the car.”

If Alameda County and Caltrans want to build a worthwhile project, they already know what to do: spend the $83 million on a bike and pedestrian lift bridge between Jack London Square and Western Alameda, finally giving residents of Western Alameda a reasonable way to walk, scooter, and bike to BART and downtown Oakland. There’d be plenty of money left over to clean up Caltran’s muck-covered undercrossings, activate and light the spaces under the freeway (and the Broadway off-ramp), and add protected bike lanes and intersections and other pedestrian improvements between Jack London Square, Chinatown, and downtown Oakland. That’s how they can actually achieve the stated goals of the OAAC project and connect these communities.

But the current team is never going to push for that. And that’s why the project needs to be cancelled–or at least rebooted, with a completely different group of planners and consultants and different lead agencies. Because it’s screamingly obvious that the people who created the lead image don’t know a thing about walking or biking, let alone Oakland, Alameda, or access.

  • p_chazz

    The JLS – Alameda bridge should also include lanes for buses and streetcars, like the Tilicum Crossing in Portland.

  • david vartanoff

    YES

  • Jame

    This proposal looks like a disaster. I have walked the Posey Tube once in the past 20 years…. notice it has never happened again. It was awful. I’d like to safely bike to Alameda at some point. But it still remains: “so close, yet so far away” when I am not in my car.

  • Andy

    tell em!

  • David Suto

    What is the message Caltran District 4 is saying when it provides exactly 2 bike loops outside its block sized office for visitors?

  • That’s “the harrowing Posey tube”, thank you.

  • Roger R.

    Drive.

  • So this should be like a petition or an email template to send to relevant project owners or politicians, right?

  • thielges

    I’m another member of the “tried the Posey Tube once” club. Now visits to Alameda are crafted around entering the island via the bridges on the southern end. That’s quite a detour some times.

    Before Caltrans commits to this plan the committee that decides should make a field trip to the tube and try it themselves first hand.

  • David

    Didn’t you guys post a similar whiny op-ed about this project a few months ago? Yeah the proposal doesn’t go as far as it should, but there isn’t enough money here to build what is really needed (a new bike/ped crossing) and also fix the existing conditions. In typical out-of-touch advocacy, you don’t want good because it isn’t perfect. As a person who is in the area with some regularity, I’ll take this improvement, please and thank you. But let’s not stop there. Let’s get a bike/ped crossing IN ADDITION TO this set of improvements. Just a new bike/ped crossing isn’t enough, and I’d rather not deal with the crap we have now because somebody thinks we should build the new crossing first.

  • Roger R.

    Go look at the protected intersections around Lake Merritt. You don’t have to break the bank to make car intersections safe. This isn’t a question of the perfect versus the good. This is just a bad project, another Caltrans/ACTA ramp project, with a few sops thrown in, and it is steady devolving (I have the latest plans on my desk, with another car lane added, another parking lane, and another bike lane now gone). In the end, I doubt we’ll actually see the slip lanes removed in Chinatown… not with this group of planners. At best, it’ll be the very last thing they do.

  • David

    If they have pulled out another bike lane to put in a traffic lane or parking, then that is indeed a step in the wrong direction. For as much crap as I’m giving you about this, I appreciate that you are keeping tabs on this.

  • thielges

    How can a bicyclist safely pass a jogger within a 4.4 foot wide lane? And that isn’t a 4.4′ wide piece of pavement surrounded by open air. That’s 4.4 feet between a rough, dirty concrete wall and the railing above the car lanes. Better not let those handle bars strike the side!

    And notice how that cross section space is allocated, 7.8 feet accommodates 3 people on foot or bike. Compare that to 22 feet allocated to the average 2.5 people who can be expected in those cars. If you’re human powered you get 2.6 feet per person. In a car you’re allowed over three times the cross section space, That’s a good measure of how Caltrans values different transit modes through this tight bottleneck.

  • Roger R.

    Actually, it’s 44 feet allocated to cars. Remember there’s a second whole tube.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

The entrance to the Posey Tube. Cars transitioning from the tube to I-880 turn Oakland's Chinatown into a traffic sewer. Image: Alameda County Transportation Commission

Oakland Alameda Access Project Kicks Off With a Car-First Focus

|
Thanks to I-880 and its complex of on and offramps, walking or bike riding through Oakland’s Chinatown, downtown, or on routes to Jack London Square and the estuary, can be pretty awful. That’s why a series of projects, some official, some grass-roots, including Walk this Way and Connect Oakland, are trying to fix some of the damage […]