Menlo Park Fire District Opposes Protected Bike Lanes on El Camino Real

Menlo Park’s Fire District is fighting a trial project to install protected or buffered bike lanes on El Camino Real. Image: City of Menlo Park

Menlo Park’s proposal for protected bike lanes on El Camino Real is meeting resistance from the top brass at the city’s Fire Protection District, who would rather see the road become wider and more dangerous.

In a recent letter to the Menlo Park City Council, Fire Chief Harold Schapelhouman completely missed the point of installing protected bike lanes — to make making bicycling safer and more attractive. “I cannot recommend the use of El Camino Real in Menlo Park to bicyclists because it is a fairly dangerous route,” he wrote. “In my 35-year career, bicyclists almost always ‘lose’ when they are involved with an accident involving a vehicle, no matter who is at fault or to blame.”

Instead, Schapelhouman said it would be “interesting” to expand the street-level highway to six lanes and synchronize traffic signals to let drivers speed through downtown Menlo Park.

Three city advisory commissions have endorsed the conceptual plan to install bike lanes, either physically protected from motor traffic by curbs and landscaped traffic islands, or an alternative with just a painted buffer zone.

At an August 25 meeting, Menlo Park City Council members refrained from voting on those proposals but did say they favor a trial version of the protected bike lanes, which would replace 156 parking spaces along all 1.3 miles of El Camino Real within the city.

“Until we as a city envision transportation differently and implement actually very simple infrastructure… it’s just going to always be easier to jump in your car,” said Cindy Walton, vice chair of the Menlo Park Bicycle Commission, told the City Council. “We have to do things that are transformative in order to enable people to ride their bikes, or take buses, or walk.”

The Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition “strongly support[s] adding protected bike lanes to El Camino and creating a safer Complete Streets corridor with transportation options for everyone,” said Policy Manager Emma Shlaes.

At the same meeting, Menlo Park Fire Marshall Jon Johnston asked the City Council to delay action until “a comprehensive public safety analysis is included” in the two-year El Camino Real Corridor Study that recommends protected bike lanes, and until the city’s General Plan Circulation Element is updated (expected next July). Johnston said that the El Camino study did not factor in “emergency response, the recognition of hospitals on either end, and Fire Department access in regards to this corridor.”

Transportation planners from W-Trans, the consulting firm that conducted the study for the city, explained that expanding El Camino to six lanes would only invite more car traffic and make the street even more dangerous for people walking and bicycling.

Ceding the curbside lanes car traffic would also slow emergency vehicles more than the bike lane configurations, “because essentially there is no place to pull over” in the event of a traffic backup, said W-Trans Principal Steve Weinberger. “With a striped buffer and bike lane, in the case of an emergency vehicle siren behind… you can easily pull over into the bike lane and buffered area to create room for the emergency vehicle.”

This is what the Fire District would like to see on El Camino Real through downtown Menlo Park — six lanes of traffic. Photo: Google Street View

The idea of a six-lane configuration didn’t win over Council Member Kirsten Keith. “I just don’t see that as the vision for Menlo Park,” she said. “It just creates three lanes [in each direction] of faster traffic.”

As Keith noted, other California cities like Long Beach have proven that protected bike lanes enable more people to bike. “It’s impressive, and they have separate signals for cars and for bikes,” she said. Menlo Park’s vision for El Camino Real would take it a step further with Dutch-style “protected intersection” designs.

Along with the Fire District, some business owners have opposed bike lanes on El Camino Real because it would remove car parking. According to the Almanac, a merchant submitted a petition with 240 signatures to preserve car parking on the street.

Only one-third of those parking spaces are used, at most, according to counts taken last September cited in the city’s study.

Others told the City Council that making El Camino Real better for biking and walking would boost business. From the Almanac:

Dale Hall, who works in Menlo Park and is part of the new environmental organization Menlo Spark, said other communities, including San Francisco and Oakland, have seen more business for nearby retailers after improving bike lanes.

“If you’re in a car on El Camino, you’re either flying by or you’re at a stoplight,” he said. “This just isn’t a proposal to help out a small group of die-hard bicyclists,” he added, but something that “will benefit the entire Menlo Park community.”

Siding against bike lanes on El Camino, Council members Catherine Carlton and Peter Ohtaki said bike traffic should be detoured on to side streets, which would be less direct. Ohtaki also backed six traffic lanes on El Camino, saying it could reduce cut-through car traffic in the Allied Arts neighborhood south of downtown.

Council Member Rich Cline also favored alternative routes, but said El Camino Real needs to be made safer for the people who bicycle there anyway.

The City Council is expected to review a report in October with details about the trial bike lane project, including the implementation schedule, plans for data collection, and details about traffic, parking, and emergency response.

“We as a city can make El Camino what we want it to be,” said Council Member Ray Mueller, who favored the trial. “Is traffic volume actually going to drop? Are we actually going to go ahead and see people use these bike lanes?”

A protected bike lane in Long Beach. Photo: San Francisco Bicycle Coalition/Flickr
  • BBnet3000

    I cannot recommend the use of El Camino Real in Menlo Park to bicyclists because it is a fairly dangerous route

    He opposes making the street safer because it is currently dangerous? I’m afraid I don’t follow his reasoning. I suspect there may be no reasoning to speak of and these may be the words of a complete moron.

  • Mesozoic Polk

    Harold Schapelhouman sounds like a treasure. He should come to San Francisco — with his circuitous logical reasoning “skills”, he’ll fit right in.

  • Not ready to call anyone a ‘moron’, but these concerns have proven to be invalid in so many different urban and inner-suburban places, that I’m beginning to have less patience for the entertaining of this logic. Specifically, these trials are the only way to move forward with these types of transportation interventions, so while one may disagree, the trials are the mechanism with which to confirm or deny these un-researched opinions by concerned citizens.

  • Fire departments often get called in for traffic accidents. Perhaps he just wants a steady supply of work?

  • DrunkEngineer

    Wouldn’t the cycleway actually improve access for emergency vehicles? It removes and/or relocates parking away from buildings. And if the ROW is wide enough, emergency vehicles could use the cycletrack to bypass traffic.

  • murphstahoe

    Keeping the route dangerous is job security for EMTs

  • Anandakos

    “In my 35-year career”

    Time for this dinosaur to be tossed on the bone pile.

  • reasonableguy

    I avoid El Camino whenever I can when on my bike. But Menlo Park doesn’t make that easy, unless one has time for far more circuitous routes. Try getting to Safeway from anywhere east of El Camino.

  • jd_x

    I don’t understand how we got to the point where we think fire chiefs have any business commenting on what will or will not make roads safer. These people are nowhere close to being experts on the subject and are not at all trained in the latest developments in urban infrastructure, e.g. the growth of Complete Streets, and it’s downright dangerous that we’re allowing them to derail the process. Cities all over the world are able to get by with less than 6-lane roads without burning down and Menlo Park is no exception.

    Given how much of the time fire departments spend responding to traffic accidents, you would expect fire chiefs to be among the most passionate supporters of getting people out of cars and onto active transit. Yet, when you are addicted to the car, it’s amazing how skewed your perspective becomes such that you simply cannot envision an alternative even when it makes a city safer ….

  • gneiss

    Our Fire Departments are often the biggest critics of livable streets initiatives because they are perceived as “slowing down” emergency vehicles. That’s because for years, they have been taught that faster response times to incidents means lives getting saved. However, one of the other ways to save lives is to prevent and minimize the injures in the first place.

    Over the years, fire prevention efforts for buildings, where they have enhanced building codes to use safer materials, created safer sprinkler systems, installed safer electrical systems and many many other changes has been used to make buildings far safer than they ever were in the past. This has greatly minimized the risk of building burning in the first place. Unfortunately, our fire departments appear blind to fact that another one of the biggest sources of emergency calls, motor vehicle crashes, could also be minimized if streets were designed to slow down traffic rather than speed it up.

  • lunartree

    They could also just get smaller trucks like they have in most other countries.

  • ARRO

    Most other countries do not have the same requirements of what each truck must be able to carry to be capable of responding to the wide variety of calls received.

  • lunartree

    Then it sounds like there’s a lot we could learn from their approach.

  • ARRO

    While any department can learn from eachother, every region will have different needs and with the multiple roles that our fire departments must play, firetrucks are already quite compact for what is required of them. SF has the same predicament, with a complex urban environment such as ours, powerful trucks capable of carrying 500 gallons of water up our hills is a must not to mention all the other necessary pieces of equipment such as varying lengths of ladders, pumps, etc.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Menlo Park Gets One Step Closer to Protected Bike Lanes on El Camino Real

|
A report released by Menlo Park’s Public Works Department last week [PDF] recommends protected bike lanes and Dutch-style “protected intersections” on El Camino Real. The two-year El Camino Real Corridor Study, led by transportation consulting firm W-Trans, said building bike lanes protected from car traffic by a curb would provide “the most optimum safety conditions for bicycling” and walking while […]

Menlo Park El Camino Real Bike Lanes Delayed Again

|
Menlo Park’s plans to fix El Camino Real’s safety hazards were postponed yet again by a city council that is now split on whether to go ahead with the installation of even a bike lane pilot project. Proponents continue to demand that the city take action to prevent injuries suffered by residents in traffic collisions. “The goals of Menlo […]

South Bay Cities Build Region’s First Separated Bike Lanes

|
New on-street bike lanes separated from auto traffic are nearing completion in Palo Alto and Menlo Park, and a handful of neighboring cities have plans to install them too. Separated bike infrastructure gained traction among local planners after Caltrans approved Class IV Separated Bikeway design standards [PDF] in December 2015. The first protected intersections were built […]