The shortage of public spaces in San Francisco’s downtown has long been compounded by the fact that the urban geography of privately owned public open spaces (POPOS) makes them hard to find and even harder to enjoy. The San Francisco Planning and Urban Research (SPUR) last week released a report that details all of downtown’s POPOS, complete with a printable map [PDF], and makes recommendations on how to improve access and amenities.
San Francisco’s first privately owned, publicly accessible park was constructed at the base of the Transamerica building in the late 1960s. At that time, building codes neither required nor encouraged development of public space at street level, and accordingly most office towers were built right to the edge of the property. The few exceptions were in buildings where developers sought density and height bonuses and created public space as a condition for approval.
In the 1985 Downtown Plan the city codified the conditions under which developers had to construct publicly accessible open spaces, which could be as diverse as plazas, greenhouses, or atriums, but had to comply with standards of landscaping, design, seating, and bathrooms. Yet, the city made no effort to provide information about the plazas in aggregate.
“Here was a territory that existed for which there was no map,” said Rebar’s Blaine Merker. “We kept seeing little plaques that said these were public spaces, but you had to go past security guards and up elevators to get to them. We felt that art could be a form of urban research, but we needed to create art that was equally as absurd as the spaces.”
After identifying more than a dozen POPOS, Rebar led tours and “paraformances” in them, from kite flying to Balinese Kecak monkey chanting. On more than one occasion, they were confronted by unhappy building managers.
On July 21st, 2007, with ACLU legal observation, the Rebar tour was threatened with arrest by the security guards at Foundry Square, 500 Howard St.
After Rebar’s legal representative encouraged the security guard to call the SFPD, saying they were willing to be arrested while monkey chanting, the security administration from Foundry acknowledged the SFPD had sided with Rebar’s interpretation of the space and would not respond to the call.
The ACLU believed the event to be precedent-setting and legally significant for opening up POPOS should there be future efforts to prevent public access.
“The security guards not only didn’t know it was public space,” said Merker, “but were actively telling people to get out.”
Building off of Rebar’s COMMONspace project, SPUR convened a task force of artists, public space advocate s, former planners who had developed The Downtown Plan, and current city planners to review the rules and regulations governing POPOS. They visited all the POPOS, determined which had been constructed before and after 1985 and established standards for evaluating their success as public spaces.
“We found it very interesting to think of what the rights of users and owners of the spaces are,” said SPUR project leader Sarah Karlinsky. “The city hasn’t done a great job of tracking how POPOS are used and enforced. We were interested in getting the public involved as a vested interest–the Friends of POPOS idea from the report–so that the spaces can’t be taken away.”
SPUR makes numerous recommendations for improving the public’s experience of existing POPOS, including better signage, better maintenance of the facilities, more seating, and cleaner bathrooms, as well as standards that should be required for the construction of future POPOS. The report concludes:
Privately-owned public open spaces are a key component of our downtown open space network. There are many steps we can take to improve and make better use of these important spaces. Given the changing role of our downtown core, our future open space needs may not be the same as those in years past. It is up to us to build on our past successes to make sure that the next generation of downtown open spaces helps us create a better San Francisco.
In addition to providing the excellent walking guide of POPOS, SPUR will be hosting a walking tour of the spaces on January 28th, 2009 with two city planners who worked on the 1985 Downtown Plan.
From SPUR: Image credit: SPUR intern Sergio Ruiz Privately owned public open spaces (POPOS) are a critical part of San Francisco’s downtown open-space network. As we contemplate new POPOS to come — including one twice the size of Union Square planned for the new Transbay Transit Center — it’s a good time to ask: What makes for great […]
From SPUR: Privately owned public open spaces, or POPOS, are gems hidden within downtown San Francisco’s urban fabric. But have they been a viable amenity? As the downtown continues to grow, should property owners be allowed to pay to convert their POPOS to private use? Come learn about the future of POPOS in San Francisco. […]
The first private automobile users on early 20th-century American streets were generally accorded no special privileges on the public right-of-way. “The center of the road was reserved for streetcars, and the new automobiles had to move out of the way,” as Renee Montagne describes it in the 1996 documentary Taken for a Ride, which chronicles […]
Meters along the Embarcadero are part of the Port of San Francisco’s SFPark trial. Photo: Matthew Roth No sizable city in the country, or likely the world, has been able to say with any certainty how many parking spaces it has, public or private, until now. Over the last 18 months, the San Francisco Municipal […]
The SFMTA’s parking management efforts in the northeast Mission continue on Saturday with a drop-in style public meeting about developing a saner parking system in a neighborhood where drivers circle endlessly to find spots. Plenty of opponents are expected to try to shut the process down, so parking reform supporters will need to make sure they’re heard too. Here are […]
A simulation of the proposed discount mall on Market Street, City Place. Image: Urban Realty. At another marathon Planning Commission meeting last week, parking was all the rage. Two projects in particular had community members and housing and transit advocates fired up because of the parking that developers proposed to build, or in one case, […]