Why Conservatives (and Everyone) Should Care About Transit

Big thanks this morning to Streetsblog Network member Trains for America, which links to a fascinating essay
from the Witherspoon Institute on why social conservatives should
support public transit and walkable communities. Here’s a taste of the
Witherspoon piece:

3042652252_5174fbe9ed.jpgLooking for real family values? You’ll find them in walkable communities. Photo by renee @ FIMBY via Flickr.

American conservatives have come to be associated with support for
transportation decisions that promote dependence on automobiles, while
American liberals are more likely to be associated with public
transportation, city life, and pro-pedestrian policies. This
association can be traced to the ’70s, when cities became associated
with social dysfunction and suburbs remained bastions of ‘normalcy.’
This dynamic was fueled by headlines mocking ill-conceived transit
projects that conservatives loved to point out as examples of wasteful
government spending. Of course, just because there is a historic
explanation for why Democrats are “pro-transit” and Republicans are
“pro-car” does not mean that these associations make any sense. Support
for government-subsidized highway projects and contempt for efficient
mass transit does not follow from any of the core principles of social

A common misperception is that the current American state of
auto-dependency is a result of the free market doing its work. In fact,
a variety of government interventions ensure that the transportation
“market” is skewed towards car-ownership.

As Trains for America’s Pat Lynch says,
"Sensible transportation policies are good for families and
communities. Who would have thunk it?"

More from the network: The Overhead Wire reports on how states are still lobbying for disproportionate spending on highways, Kaid Benfield on NRDC Switchboard links to the work of UC Berkeley’s Robert Cervero on transit-oriented development; and the Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia reports on the governor of Delaware’s executive order creating a complete streets policy for that state.


“Street Fight”: The New Guide to SF’s Transportation Politics

On the Sunset District’s 19th Avenue, a street transformed into an urban highway environment in the mid-20th century, Muni buses jostle for room on a car-clogged six-lane roadway, where residents put their lives in the hands of long-distance car commuters every time they cross. And all but the exceptionally adventurous can forget about bicycling on the […]

Isn’t Self-Sufficiency a Conservative Thing?

Anyone who’s ever maintained a blog knows how easily it can burn you out. So we’d like to give a special welcome back to one of our Streetsblog Network members, WalkBikeCT, which has returned to the keyboard with a renewed sense of purpose after a few months of hiatus. Their first offering of the new […]

MTC Adopts Aggressive 15 Percent Target for Reducing Emissions by 2035

Photo: Keenahn The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), in a historic vote Wednesday that will help guide the future for more sustainable land use and transportation planning in the Bay Area, recommended a 15 percent per capita target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by 2035, the most aggressive goal to date among California’s metropolitan planning […]

Commentary: Proposition G and the Vision of the City

Editor’s note: Jason Henderson, a geography professor at San Francisco State University who writes about the politics of mobility, explains why he’s voting against Proposition G on November 2. We’ve invited the Yes on G side to write an op-ed and hope to publish it soon. A lot of well-meaning people are leaning towards voting […]