Budget Update Taken Off Agenda for Today’s MTA Board Meeting

Although the MTA is facing a growing budget deficit that some estimate at $25-30 million or higher, the agency has not publicly talked about how it intends to close the gap, nor has it embraced revenue generators like expanded parking meter hours in commercial districts. An update of the FY 2010 budget was agendized last Friday for today’s MTA board meeting, but the item was subsequently removed, MTA spokesperson Judson True confirmed.


In an interview last week, MTA Board Chairman Tom Nolan told Streetsblog the agency was likely to face a $30 million deficit, a large chunk of that from the sale of taxi medallions, which the MTA had budgeted to bring in $15 million. 

True wouldn’t elaborate on why the budget item had been removed from today’s agenda, despite repeated requests for an explanation. He offered only vagaries: "We continue to have ongoing financial problems. We’re still crunching numbers and there are a lot of conversations being had."

When asked if the MTA was getting pressure from Mayor Gavin Newsom not to present the budget deficit item because of Newsom’s opposition to extending meter hours, True responded, "not to my knowledge." He added, "The mayor is making public statements and we’re listening to that, just as we’re listening to the Board of Supervisors and the public."

Board of Supervisors President David Chiu’s office was more candid. "We stand in the same frustrated place we did about a month ago," said Chiu’s spokesperson, David Noyola. "Everybody knows there’s a problem; there are no appetizing solutions. It’s either figure out a place to find revenue or find a way to reduce expenditure and cost."

On the issue of mayoral pressure on the MTA, Noyola said, "You have an executive branch that is understandably sheepish about the reaction [to the parking study] and they have publicly said they’re opposed." He said he would not speculate whether Newsom’s office was pressuring the MTA behind the scenes.

Livable City Executive Director and BART Board Director Tom Radulovich said BART was moving to address its $20 million projected deficit proactively, before it becomes a bigger problem, and so should the MTA. "If MTA is running a big budget deficit, they absolutely should be talking about it. If they’re running a budget deficit and projecting a shortfall the following year, then not talking about [it] will intensify the problem the following year."

Radulovich also said he had no confidence that Newsom would do what’s needed to keep Muni from suffering more service cuts. "Will the Mayor let Muni go down the tubes? I think the answer is probably yes. He hasn’t shown any initiative raising money for the MTA. [Proposition E, which merged the Department of Parking and Traffic with Muni in 1999] says he shall ‘diligently seek new revenue sources for Muni.’ In terms of him diligently seeking new revenue sources, I haven’t seen it."

Noyola suggested that a conversation about extending parking meters should happen, particularly because the MTA completed its parking study with due diligence. "We considered parking meters in a vacuum, now we need to hear it in context. One of the ways to force the issue is to have a public hearing."

Noyola said his office is considering holding a hearing to shed light on the MTA’s budget situation, a solution Supervisor John Avalos committed to do if Chiu did not. In an interview with Streetsblog last week, Avalos said, "They have a growing budget deficit that they need to move on. Any inaction is going to see that deficit continue to grow." He added that he would hold the MTA accountable in the same way he did in May when the budget issue was last debated.

Radulovich suggested that the problem is endemic of the formative structure of the MTA and might not be resolved without a fundamental restructuring of the agency, something Livable City supported in 2007 with Proposition A. He suggested San Francisco should seriously consider how well the agency is serving the city and whether or not its charter needs another revision.

"The lack of accountability is a real structural problem," he said. "When the MTA does something that could cause acute political pain, the answer is always ‘don’t do it.’ On the other hand, when the MTA runs down, it doesn’t stick to anyone.  There’s this political distancing that goes on, especially from the Mayor’s office." 

"MTA’s 10th Anniversary is this November," he added. "I think it’s a good time to look at what’s working and what’s not working."

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors meeting is today at 2 p.m. San Francisco City Hall, room 400. The parking study presentation is item 14 on the agenda. The meeting will be broadcast online on SFGTV2.  Here’s more info on who to contact to voice your support for the parking study. You can also send feedback to extendedhours@sfmta.com.

  • The timidity with which the Board members, particularly inexperienced ones, approach the Mayor’s office is pathetic. The emperor has no clothes, kids, and it’s time to show leadership where the “Mayor” and the MTA board will not. Come on, guys, you can do it…or maybe not I dunno. Still, let’s not kowtow to a lame duck running for higher office, let’s show how to do things better for everyone’s sake!

  • Jamie Whitaker

    I like Board of Supes President Chiu’s spokesperson’s comment, “Everybody knows there’s a problem; there are no appetizing solutions. It’s either figure out a place to find revenue or find a way to reduce expenditure and cost.” It really is that simple in theory.

  • patrick

    This statement has confused me:

    “Noyola suggested that a conversation about extending parking meters should happen”

    does that mean that the parking meeter study is also not happening at the meeting, or is it just the MTA budget that’s been removed?

    Thanks for any clarification.

  • @Patrick. The parking meter study will be presented today as an informational item. By “conversation” I think Noyola meant that they should debate the merits of the extended hours study, not just hear an informational report.

  • CBrinkman

    Will there be public comment or is it not worth going to the MTA meeting if it’s not a discussion item?

  • @CBrinkman and others. It’s open to public comment and there will be a bunch of anti-parking meter extension commentary coming from Chinatown merchants, likely from others.

  • I can’t go because I am down in Santa Clara. I sent Bevan an email.

    The punchline?

    “Business owners and the general public often cannot comprehend the benefit they stand to gain from what appears to be “Just another tax on hard working folks”. I understand that given your Mayoral ambitions the temptation exists to exploit their ignorance and do the wrong thing. Please rise above.”

  • Sue

    “When asked if the MTA was getting pressure from Mayor Gavin Newsom not to present the budget deficit item because of Newsom’s opposition to extending meter hours, True responded, ‘not to my knowledge.’ He added, ‘The mayor is making public statements and we’re listening to that, just as we’re listening to the Board of Supervisors and the public.'”

    While Judson True may not know whether or not the mayor is pressuring the MTA directors, I have seen evidence of the mayor working behind the scenes — indirectly — to scuttle MTA staffer proposals. He is playing the ‘economy card,’ no doubt at the behest of the Chamber of Commerce, SF BOMA, and other organizations in his opposition to expanded metering hours.

    But here’s the reality: the mayor is seeking to ensure his political future by protecting the parking status quo, and the Chamber and other organizations are playing the ‘economy card’ as a way to flex their political muscles and demonstrate that they still rule locally (besides protecting their bottom lines). (Sadly, their use of the ‘economy card’ is the same strategy that the fossil fuel lobby is using on the national and international level to scuttle climate change legislation and whatever could potentially come out of Copenhagen in December.)

    If we are realistic, however, in no way is the ‘economy’ that the mayor and the Chamber and others are so passionate about going to be the same in a few a years. The vibrant, globe-trotting animal that we knew it to be from the late 1990s until the recent economic collapse is unlikely to ever come back, at least on a permanent basis — nor should it because it is not environmentally sustainable. If we are realistic, we will accept the likelihood that our economies will be — and should be — more and more based on local production and that ownership and operation of cars will become less and less common.

    These trends will be in response to the increasing cost of energy as it becomes more and more scarce, as a result of competition and depletion, and to pressures from global climate change, among others. Over the long term, we need to prepare for these pressures by expanding public transportation and gradually adopting disincentives to driving cars. We need to prepare by engaging in organized “powering down,” as author Richard Heinberg, puts it.

    In the next few days and weeks, however, we need to call on the mayor to support the recommendations of the Parking Meter study and on the members of the Board of Directors to approve the recommendations unanimously — at the very least, on a trial basis.


The MTA’s Lack of Transparency Over a Worsening Budget Deficit

MTA Chief Nat Ford should come clean about the budget deficit. Listed under the MTA Board’s agenda, on the agency’s antiquated website, is a link titled "Know Your Rights Under the Sunshine Ordinance." "Government’s duty is to serve the public," it says, "reaching its decision in full view of the public." It’s an ironic juxtaposition […]

MTA Board Will Be Asked to Declare Fiscal Emergency

Fare hikes and service reductions are likely on the way for Muni. Flickr photo: Tom Prete The Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors will be asked to declare a fiscal emergency at its meeting next Tuesday, a move that will allow Muni to skip environmental reviews and implement service cuts and fare hikes this year […]