Skip to content
Sponsored

Thanks to our advertising sponsor -

Report: Road Funding From Non-Road Users Doubled in 25 Years

The myth that U.S. roads "pay for themselves" thanks to user fees is a subject that's likely familiar to many Streetsblog readers -- but just how much of the nation's highway funding is provided by charging drivers?
highway_funds_chart.png(Image: Subsidyscope)

The myth
that U.S. roads “pay for themselves” thanks to user fees is a subject
that’s likely familiar to many Streetsblog readers — but
just how much of the nation’s highway funding is provided by charging
drivers?

The answer may surprise even active critics of the
current asphalt-centric transportation system. Between 1982 and 2007,
the amount of federal highway revenue derived from non-users of the
highway system has doubled, according to a study released last week by Subsidyscope.

Analyzing
Federal Highway Administration data dating back to 1957, the dawn of
the Interstate system, Subsidyscope researchers found that non-users of
the highway system contributed $70 billion for nationwide road
construction and maintenance in 2007. In 1982, by contrast, highway
contributions from non-users totaled just $35 billion (in 2007 dollars).

The
study also found that the share of road funding generated by user fees
fell to 51 percent in 2007, down from 61 percent just a decade earlier.
(The accounting used by Subsidyscope, a joint project of the Pew
Charitable Trusts and the Sunlight Foundation, accounted for the use of
about one-sixth of federal gas tax revenue to pay for transit.)

What
has caused the government’s increasingly rapid dependence on non-road
user fees — which more often than not take the form of direct
transfers from the Treasury — to pay for roads?

Subsidyscope
points out that the federal gas tax has stayed stagnant since 1993,
rapidly losing value as inflation climbs, but the growing popularity of
bond issuances as a way to pay for new roads is also a factor.
According to Subsidyscope’s research, the value of new bonds issued to
pay for highways reached $24.7 billion in 2007, up from just $6 billion
in new bonds issued in 1982 (converted to 2007 dollars).

Bond
offerings, which often represent states and localities playing a
greater role in transportation planning, do not guarantee that users
will be paying for new highway construction — rather, bonds depend on
market conditions to allow a successful leveraging of debt, and the
recent economic downturn has forced many governments to limit their bonding plans.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog San Francisco

Commentary: Not Surprised Oakland’s Prop E Failed

June 10, 2026

Oakland Completes Another Segment of Greenway in East Oakland

June 10, 2026

Legislators Urge Newsom to Restore Transit Funding as Budget Negotiations Continue

June 10, 2026

In Memory of Fallen Chicago Complete Streets Planner Riley O’Neil

June 10, 2026
See all posts