Little-Known Provision in Senate Jobs Bill Could Spark House Resistance
The Senate passed its jobs bill today by a 70-28 vote,
bringing Congress one step closer to a $20 billion transfer that would
keep the nation's highway trust fund solvent until 2011 and extend the
2005 federal transportation law.
House transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) (Photo: Capitol Chatter)The bill's future in the House appears bright, as Democrats in that chamber point to
the urgent need to pass legislation showing their commitment to
stemming the rising tide of unemployment. But members of the House
transportation committee, including chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN),
remain concerned about a little-discussed provision in the Senate jobs
bill that they consider an unfairly biased distribution of
infrastructure funding.
The Senate language in question would extend two grant programs
created by the 2005 federal transport law, often referred to by its
acronym of SAFETEA-LU.
Those programs were the Projects of Regional and National Significance (PRNS),
which allowed lawmakers to steer funds to multi-year proposals that
often had a transit or freight component, and the National Corridor
Infrastructure Improvement Program (NCIIP), which focused largely on earmarks for massive road projects (including Alaska's infamous Bridge to Nowhere).
Extending
the PRNS and NCIIP grants through the end of 2010 would result in an
estimated $932 million of new funding. The House-passed jobs bill
would free up that money for a merit-based process, with all 50 states
eligible to submit their transport plans, but the Senate-passed jobs
bill would keep that money flowing to its 2009 beneficiaries, according
to Oberstar's office.
What does that mean in practice? Of the
$932 million, 58 percent would automatically go to four states:
California, Washington, Louisiana, and Illinois. Nine other states
would get between $20 million and $50 million in 2010, and 22 states
would "not receiv[e] a penny," as 23 members of Oberstar's committee
wrote yesterday in a letter to House Democratic leaders.
Here's a longer excerpt from that 23-lawmaker letter:
Thistransportation funding proposal [in the Senate jobs bill] is unfair tothe taxpayers of 46 states, unresponsive to the whole nation'sinfrastructure and job creation needs, and unacceptable to the House ofRepresentatives. We request that you work to ensure that any extensionof surface transportation programs maintains the discretionary,competitive nature of the [two grant] programs, rather thandistributing funds based on fiscal year 2009 earmarks. This is not anew concept. ...
We believe the Department of Transportation is prepared toquickly distribute these funds to needed projects across the nation,either by funding worthy applications to the oversubscribed TIGERprogram or through existing mechanisms ... Such an approach wouldensure broad investment in worthy projects rather than directing largeamounts of funding on a non-competitive basis to a few lucky states.
Eight House members from the North Carolina delegation sent a similar,
bipartisan letter to both House GOP and Democratic leaders, urging them
to make sure that "funds from the two [grant] programs are allocated
equitably and that projects of national significance in all parts of
the country are given a fair opportunity for funding."
The
entire Massachusetts delegation, including Sens. Scott Brown (R) and
John Kerry (D), sent a similarly worded letter of their own to
Democratic leaders in the House and Senate on Monday.
Oberstar
spokesman Jim Berard said in an interview that while the transportation
panel chairman has "consistently been
for shorter extensions" of the 2005 law "rather than longer ones" --
the House jobs bill has one that lasts until September 30 -- the Senate
version's treatment of the PRNS and NCIIP grant programs is a more
significant obstacle to winning his support.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
