Skip to Content
Streetsblog San Francisco home
Streetsblog San Francisco home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

Parking Lots Shouldn’t Take Up Prime Streetfront Real Estate

2282056253_0b5dd5c914.jpgThe parking
lot is behind these Boca Raton residences. (Photo: faceless b
via Flickr)

It might seem like a simple idea — that having an enormous parking
lot in front of a business makes it unattractive to pedestrians and
disrupts the fabric of a neighborhood. Unfortunately, this is the way
that huge swaths of American towns and cities are designed.

This morning, Kaid
Benfield at NRDC Switchboard
posts about a relatively simple
reversal that can make a real difference in the quality of a community’s
street life: Put the parking in the back. He concedes that it’s not a
solution for purists:

Some advocates might just wish that cars would go away entirely, or
that communities make it so inconvenient or costly for their drivers
that they dwindle in number.  But, for most places, that isn’t realistic
and could even be counterproductive, chasing businesses out of central
cities and exacerbating sprawl at a time when we should be doing the
opposite. What we can realistically do is to make sure our
buildings and streetscapes are fully supportive of environment- and
community-friendly modes of travel. Placing the parking to the rear
still allows access for drivers while attracting more walkers and
transit users in front. 

That’s the configuration that I encountered when visiting a
relatively new neighborhood in Las Vegas a couple of weeks ago. The
central shopping mall was designed with streetfront stores and an
interior parking lot; on a pretty Sunday afternoon, it attracted a
significant amount of foot traffic from the surrounding residences. The
place is deeply car-dependent, but there was still a sense of
neighborhood activity and interaction that is largely absent in
developments where parking sits in front of retail. While people living
there drive to work, they consider it normal to walk to a neighborhood
café.

Perfect? No. Better? Definitely.

Benfield’s post is well worth reading in full, so head on over.

More from around the network: Bike
Friendly Oak Cliff
has a harsh critique of a "complete street" plan
in that Dallas community. DC
Bicycle Transportation Examiner
looks at the ratio of homicides by
stranger to traffic fatalities (hint: the second number is higher). And WalkBikeJersey
does some dispiriting math on fare hikes for bicyclists using transit
in that state.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog San Francisco

Commentary: Oakland Councilmember Bas Fails to Fix Estuary Channel Path

It's a matter of time before a cyclist or pedestrian is killed crossing Lake Merritt Boulevard or I-880's ramps and frontage roads because the channel path is blocked

July 26, 2024
See all posts