The SF Chronicle published its take on the SFMTA's proposed network of permitted stops for private shuttles. These proposed stops would re-purpose 0.01 percent of the city's on-street parking supply as white zones. According to the Chronicle, that equates to Google buses "devouring parking," as its headline puts it.
This is seriously the narrative the Chronicle has construed, even though the article acknowledges that the amount of parking spaces is, "Well, not a huge amount — unless, of course, it’s a space you often use."
Unfortunately, it is true that every last parking space, no matter how remote, can find its own pocket of constituents. The Chronicle reported that the "Alamo Square Neighborhood Association... is fighting the proposed location of two shared stops at Hayes and Steiner streets because they would result in the part-time loss of parking." Note to Chronicle: right now, that same neighborhood is in the process of creating a long-needed residential parking permit zone to better manage its parking supply.
As the SFMTA told the Chronicle, three parking spaces in the entire shuttle pilot would be taken full-time to accommodate private transit boardings without getting in the way of Muni. These would serve far more than three bus and shuttle riders, of course, helping to reduce parking demand. Three spaces citywide, to make streets work more efficiently, evidently constitute an outrage for the Chronicle.
Just a reminder: San Francisco has more than enough street parking to line California's coastline.