What’s going on with SFMTA’s 16th Street Transit Improvement Project?

Launched in 2015, there's still little to show for it--except the creation of a dangerous 'bike corridor' on 17th to get bikes off 16th

In an effort to speed up  buses between the Mission and Mission Bay, plans are in place to make 16th street a transit-priority street--but so far, there's little to show for the effort. Photo: SFMTA
In an effort to speed up buses between the Mission and Mission Bay, plans are in place to make 16th street a transit-priority street--but so far, there's little to show for the effort. Photo: SFMTA

The $67.5 million 16th Street improvement project, part of SFMTA’s ‘Muni Forward’ plan to improve bus reliability and run times, is supposedly on schedule and on budget. But there’s decidedly little to see on the street.

“My understanding is they were supposed to stripe the transit-only lanes east of Potrero in November,” wrote Rachel Hyden, Executive Director of the San Francisco Transit Riders. “I actually rode the 55 out to our [three weeks ago] holiday party and didn’t notice them, so that’s unfortunate.”

There’s a reason she didn’t notice them (Streetsblog did a survey of the street late last week)–it’s because they’re not there.

Streetsblog reached out to SFMTA communications nearly a week ago to find out what’s going on with the project and still has received no reply. However, through a source at SFMTA who spoke on condition of anonymity, it’s clear that the transit lane should have been stripped this Fall, as Hyden believes.

On 16th street itself there is nothing to see except some flyers attached to utility poles announcing the project and a couple of easily missed transit-only signs buried in the visual noise, such as the one photographed below:

IMG_20171216_144006
Motorists could be forgiven for not noticing this sign, absent any other markings to indicate the right lanes are for public transit only. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick

According to the project web page at SFMTA, the plan is to improve the “22 Fillmore route along 2.3 miles of 16th Street, including transit-only lanes, transit bulbs, new traffic and pedestrian signals, as well as new streetscape amenities.”

SFMTA's website still lists the project as "on time," when the early implementation phase is supposed to be finished--and clearly is not. Image: SFMTA
SFMTA’s website still lists the project as “on time,” when the early implementation phase is supposed to be finished–and clearly is not. Image: SFMTA

The project also shifts bicycle traffic to 17th street, to make way for the bus-only lanes. That has been done, but cyclists are pretty universally scornful of the new bike lanes. There are a few short segments of a plastic-bollard-protected bike lane, but only in the uphill direction for the four blocks between Potrero and Kansas. The protection drops in and out abruptly and oddly and, as seen in the photo below, spills cyclists back into a door-zone lane. It’s hardly the kind of physically protected bike lane that qualifies as for “all ages and abilities.”

IMG_20171215_122248
This type of dangerous, door-zone stripe that wedges cyclists between parked cars and moving traffic shouldn’t even be in SFMTA’s toolbox anymore, but that’s how most of 17th’s ‘bike corridor’ is ‘designed.’ Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick
One of the short segments of plastic-bollard protected bike lane on one side of 17th. All protection abruptly disappears after four short blocks.
One of the short segments of plastic-bollard protected bike lane on 17th. Not bad, but protection drops in and out and then abruptly disappears completely after only four blocks. And it’s only on one side of the street. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick

“The bike lanes were actually striped like a year ago. When I worked at MTA I heard a lot of complaints about the quality, or lack thereof,” confirmed Hyden.

And cycling advocate Adam Long, who regularly commutes on 17th, is one of the people complaining…with little effect so far.

Last July, in fact, Long witnessed (and caught on his bike cam) a collision near the intersection of Texas and 17th, when a parked car pulled out of a parking spot, crossed the bike lane without looking, and rammed into a passing car. “Good thing there was no cyclist in that unprotected bike lane because they would be in the hospital right now,” wrote Long in a tweet about the incident.

“Whether you’re talking about 16th and 17th, Illinois or the bridges from the north, the bike connections into Mission Bay are just not that great. It’s a relatively flat area with a level of development that warrants better planning for how people access the UCSF campus, the coming Warriors stadium and the neighborhood generally,” wrote Chris Cassidy, spokesman for the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition.

Under the late Mayor Lee’s executive directive, SFMTA showed its ability to install reasonably good protected bike and bus infrastructure in a short amount of time–sometimes to Streetblog’s pleasant surprise. What has been installed on 17th is dangerous and sub-standard. Streetsblog can only hope that the bike lanes on 17th will get improved and the early implementation work to make a decent transit lane on 16th will get on schedule–for real, instead of just on the SFMTA web page–come the new year.

  • Eric Johnson

    I’ve taken the 55 from 16th Street BART to the new Kaiser facility on Owens a few times, usually mid-morning. The traffic is terrible, gridlocked even when you’d think rush hour should be over by now.

  • eugene

    We had some funky/rainy weather in October, so while the delay is unfortunate, hopefully they just have to get back on schedule when the roadway is dry enough to put down the thermoplastic.

  • I disagree there is “little to see on the street” because the SFMTA hasn’t properly marked the outer lane yet, but the outer lane is open again now that utility work has been completed along both 16th St and Potrero where they meet.

    Unfotunately it isn’t over either because the SFMTA is also rebuilding the power grid and extending the overhead wires into Mission Bay before they fully repave 16th and install the boarding islands and properly-marked, red-colored, transit only lanes.

    I figure that’s part of all the traffic on 17th, but that is only more reason for the SFMTA install a better bike lane and make more “early implimentation” improvements.

    The 55 feels a bit faster now now through Mission Bay, but the 22/55/33 could be faster if the SFMTA made some of the stop consolidations sooner rather than later.

    To add a little to @disqus_LHTvh9JJpA:disqus’s comment, we also had a record rainy season last winter which set a lot of projects back.

  • p_chazz

    What I would like would be a Muni Metro line that would branch off Church Street at 16th and run down 16th to Mission Bay, where it would connect with the T Third line. That way, trains could run from Embarcadero Station via Market, Duboce, Church, 16th, Third, Channel, Fourth, and then up the Central Subway to Chinatown. Sort of a curlicue connecting Downtown, Castro, Mission, Potrero, Mission Bay. and Chinatown. There could be a tunnel from Folsom to Potrero.

  • keenplanner

    I don’t know any cyclists who are “scornful” about transit lanes. Most cyclists I know are strong supporters of an efficient transit network.
    Cars parked in the bike lanes draws much more scorn.

  • p_chazz

    I think that it’s the bike lanes on 17th that cyclists are scornful of, not the transit-only lanes on 16th.

  • curiousKulak

    Not a big fan of the switch. The bike lanes on 16th were fab; 17th has soo many Stop signs – then throws you over the Mariposa bridge with that gawd-awful Stop light which traps you for over 60 secs UNNECESSARILY!. IOW, the new lanes are a two-block diversion with a half dozen hinderances.

    I hope this helps MUNI. But really, a whole traffic lane for buses averaging once-per-10+-minutes?!

    I like the idea of rails making a curcuit. Ideally, they’d go around to Ceasar Chaves and connect Dogpatch *(and BV) to the Mission/Noe Valley and central City. Unlikely though. As are rails over Geneva to Balboa Sta. and Park Merced

  • Flatlander

    Seeing as how the 22 is every 7 minutes during peak and the 55 is every 15 minutes, the combined headway is around 5 minutes, so no it’s not a whole traffic lane for a bus that comes every ten minutes.

  • curiousKulak

    I’ve tried to avoid ‘peak’ times, cuz traffic can be kinda thick. But anyway, usage once every 5 minutes still seems like a waste or real estate to me. However, give me 17th w/ timed lights and I’ll quietly go away.

  • citrate reiterator

    From your lips to God’s ears…

  • citrate reiterator

    Transit to and from Mission Bay is still godawful, particularly from almost anywhere normal people can afford to live (with the exception of BVHP, maybe). I hope this helps, but even if it goes swimmingly it seems like it will be super insufficient given the proliferation of jobs, health services, and uh, stadiums.

  • Sanfordia113

    Keep the bus on 17th. Every action by SFMTA has been to reduce services to Potrero Hill: removal of the 9 stop at the 18th Street footbridge; elimination of the Potrero loop line; now moving the 22 one block north to 16th.

  • Sanfordia113

    Only worthwhile if subterranean

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

From right to left, the Transit Rider's ED Rachel Hyden, Assemblyman David Chiu, and Steve Pepple handed out awards to transit advocates at last night's fundraiser.

Advocates Make Bold Plans for Better Transit

|
Last night the San Francisco Transit Riders (SFTR), the advocacy group that organized the 22-Day Muni Challenge and Transit Week, among other things, celebrated a year of accomplishment and laid out a list of goals for next year at a holiday party held at the Mariposa Hunters Point Yacht Club in Mission Bay. “It’s been […]

This Week: Making 16th Street Work Better for Muni

|
The SFMTA is holding public meetings this week on a more transit-friendly 16th Street and a new residential parking permit area in NoPa. You can also take a ride with the SF Bicycle Coalition to see how well streets perform for bicycling in the Richmond District. Here are this week’s highlights from the Streetsblog calendar: Wednesday: The […]
SFMTA painting the bus 'Red Carpet' lanes on Mission a couple of years back. These lanes also permit privately run, for-profit vehicles, also known as taxis. Photo: SFMTA.

Open Thread: Room for Private Vehicles in Red Carpet Lanes?

|
The SFMTA Board of Directors approved the next step in the $35 million Geary Rapid project on Tuesday, which includes segments of red carpet, bus-only lanes between Stanyan and downtown. The rub: the SFMTA decided to allow privately run transit, including tour buses, tech-buses, and Chariot, to also use the lane (in reality, non-Muni vehicles of […]

This Week: SFMTA Set to Approve New Muni Line

|
The Streetsblog calendar kicks off 2015 with a solid addition to the transit system: Tomorrow, the SFMTA Board of Directors Tuesday is expected to approve a new Muni route that would connect 16th Street BART to Mission Bay. The year’s first SPUR forums and public meetings for the first round of SFMTA street redesigns in […]

Latest Haight Street Plans Replace Most Stop Signs to Speed Up Muni

|
The Planning Department has an online survey about the Haight Street proposals, available until July 3. City planners recently presented their latest plans for Haight Street, which include two overlapping projects from two agencies. The Haight-Ashbury Public Realm Plan is the Planning Department’s effort to expand sidewalks and add aesthetic treatments along the Upper Haight […]