Skip to Content
Streetsblog San Francisco home
Streetsblog San Francisco home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

Buffalo Advocates Convince New York DOT to Rethink a Half-Baked Highway Removal

3:22 PM PST on January 9, 2018

TheĀ Scajaquada Corridor project was supposed to be a highway removal that would reconnect Buffalo residents with beautiful Delaware Park.Ā The park is part of the public space network designed for Buffalo by revered landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted. The construction of the expressway in the 1940s severely diminished it.

So why are locals cheering after New York State DOTĀ announced yesterday that it's putting a stop to the removal project?

The answer, in short, is that the state DOT's plan didn't do enough for walking, biking, and overall safety.

"They finally scrapped their bad plan," said Justin Booth, director of the advocacy group GObike Buffalo. "And it gives us a redo option."

There were a number of problems with the state DOT's approach, said Booth, starting with the decision to prioritize fast car traffic in the new design.

Intersection designs like this were not acceptable to Buffalo residents. Via Scajaquada Corridor Coalition
Intersection designs like this were not acceptable to Buffalo residents. Via Scajaquada Corridor Coalition
false

Rather than replacing the Scajaquada with a walkable boulevard, the state DOT called for some intersections to be seven to nine lanes wide, including turn lanes -- creating intimidating and dangerous crossings for pedestrians.

State officials were also wedded to the idea of a center-running median, while locals preferred to see that space dedicated to usable park space. And locals wanted to convert the historic Stone Arch Bridge, currently part of the Scajaquada, to a car-free route for walking and biking, with a new street segment functioning as a bypass (see rendering below), but the state didn't incorporate that idea.

Advocates envisioned a bike-and-pedestrian-only Stone Arch Bridge. But NYSDOT balked. Image: Olmsted Park Conservancy via
Advocates envisioned a bike-and-pedestrian-only Stone Arch Bridge. But NYSDOT balked. Image: Olmsted Park Conservancy via Buffalo Rising
false

In addition, advocates like Booth were frustrated about the lack of protected bike lanes. "The DOT was only offering a wide shoulder for bike facilities," he said.

In its design critique, the Scajaquada Corridor CoalitionĀ said the state DOT's plan was "worse than what is there now, which is pretty bad."

The Olmsted Parks Conservatory gathered 5,500 signatures calling for the state to abandon its plan. Announcing their decision to start over, state officials noted yesterday that two-thirds of public comments had been opposed to the project.

Now that the state DOT is going back to the drawing board, three state lawmakers have pledged to keep the process moving with fresh designs that better reflect the public's aspirations, reportsĀ the Buffalo News.

State Assemblyman Sean Ryan told reporters that the withdrawal of the state's plan should not require another lengthy study period.

The Scajaquada Corridor Coalition and advocates like Booth are cheering the state DOT's willingness to rethink its approach.

"Weā€™re happy to have an opportunity to restart the conversation," he said.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog San Francisco

Advocates Hammer City College Trusteesā€™ Climate Hypocrisy on Frida Kahlo Way

City College talks a good game about supporting bike lanes and better transit, until it comes to losing a few parking spaces

March 1, 2024

Eyes on the Street: 8th Street in West Oakland Looking Good

A project to transform 8th from a deadly speedway back into a residential street is making real progress

February 29, 2024
See all posts