Training Ramps up for BRT, Opening Date Still Unclear

AC Transit reiterates to motorists to get outta the damn bus lane... plus some thoughts on fares

Part of International Boulevard's new left-hand, bus-only lane. Photo: AC Transit
Part of International Boulevard's new left-hand, bus-only lane. Photo: AC Transit

AC Transit has issued a stern warning to motorists to stay out of the bus-only lanes on International Boulevard, as it enters the final phase of operator training for its Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system from San Leandro to downtown Oakland. While this is certainly a good indication that the region’s first, long-delayed BRT line is nearing completion, an opening date has still not been pegged.

“The pandemic has halted non-essential components of BRT,” explained Robert Lyles, a spokesman for AC Transit. “Social distancing requirements have also slowed efforts of our construction crews.”

Part of a flyer warning motorists to stay out of the dang bus lane. Source: AC Transit
Part of a flyer warning motorists to stay out of the dang bus lane. Source: AC Transit

“We have been conducting BRT operator training for several months,” he added. “An unimpeded lane allows us to continue operator training.”


But advocates, including those who first lobbied for the project, took the new warnings to motorists as a clear signal that the opening date is nigh:

“We need more BRT in the Bay Area, and International Boulevard is an excellent corridor for it, as one of AC Transit’s highest ridership corridors,” wrote Ian Griffiths, co-founder and director of the advocacy group Seamless Bay Area, in an email to Streetsblog.

By the way, that’s not a typo in the tweet from current SFMTA Local Government Affairs Manager Joél Ramos: he started lobbying professionally for BRT on International Boulevard some fourteen years ago.

As previously reported, between the environmental studies, the outreach, the engineering, and the construction, it’s taken since 1997 to get 7.6 miles of dedicated transit lane on International. “We’re at the very, very end” of the $240 million project, said AC Transit’s Robert del Rosario to a SPUR audience on bus transit in February. At the meeting, del Rosario said Oakland’s BRT project would open in May. It was originally supposed to open in 2016, but that was pushed back first to 2017 and then 2019.

But one might think that before investing so much time and money on BRT, AC Transit and the powers-that-be would have prioritized integrating fares with the BART line that it parallels, so riders aren’t double-dinged if they transfer. Physically, AC Transit’s BRT system “has been designed to encourage transfers, but the fare structure discourages transfers,” wrote Griffiths. “To optimize the efficiency of the system, people should be encouraged to take both BART and AC Transit in the most efficient combination possible to get to their destination.”

A rendering of Oakland's 'Bus Rapid Transit' project with buses and passengers. Image: AC Transit
A rendering of Oakland’s ‘Bus Rapid Transit’ project with buses and passengers. Image: AC Transit

There’s no questioning that International BRT will be a immense improvement over current bus services. But as advocates from overseas have long suggested, important ‘soft’ transit improvements, such as simple, striped bus-only lanes, coordinated schedules and transfers, and integrated fares should come before the big projects get underway. And yet 23 years and a couple of hundred million dollars after this BRT project began, riders will still have to pay nearly the price of two full fares to transfer between it and BART.


Hampered by Tunnels, Center BRT Lanes on Geary Limited to the Richmond

Correction 12/17: The next community meeting on Geary BRT is tonight, Tuesday, at 5:30 p.m. at the Main Public Library. The latest iteration of the plan for bus rapid transit on Geary Boulevard includes center-running bus lanes only on the Richmond District segment between Arguello Boulevard and 27th Avenue — about a quarter of the street’s […]

Parking-First “Save Polk Street” Crowd Attacks Van Ness BRT

“Save Polk Street” has aimed its parking-first agenda at Van Ness Bus Rapid Transit. A couple dozen speakers protested the project an SFMTA hearing last week, distributing fearmongering flyers [PDF] claiming that removing some parking and banning left turns would “kill small businesses,” back up car traffic, and make the street more dangerous. The long-delayed Van Ness […]

Geary BRT Plan Watered Down to Appease Parking-Obsessed Merchants

Update: This plan may not be “watered down” after all. See our follow-up report here. Planners are touting a new proposed configuration for Geary Bus Rapid Transit that would forgo bus passing lanes in order to preserve car parking to appease merchants. Separated, center-median bus lanes would be retained, and project backers hope the changes […]

Jarrett Walker: New Geary BRT Option Could Provide Faster Service

When it comes to providing the fastest, most reliable bus rapid transit service on Geary Boulevard, cutting out bus passing lanes and “consolidating” local and express services might sound like a downgrade. But according to transit consultant Jarrett Walker, such a configuration could actually provide a superior level of service. It’s all about using the right […]