SPUR Talk: Streamlining S.F.’s Bike, Ped, & Transit Projects

The "quick build" bike lane on the Embarcadero. An example of a project exempted from environmental review. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick
The "quick build" bike lane on the Embarcadero. An example of a project exempted from environmental review. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick

Until recently, even something as environmentally friendly and innocuous as a bike lane project could be forced to go through a full-blown, years long “environmental” review.

“Bus Rapid Transit, light rail, pedestrian safety projects… they are inherently environmentally sustainable, but they get caught up in CEQA (the California Environmental Quality Act), said Senator Scott Wiener (S.F.), at a panel discussion at SPUR Thursday afternoon. Lawsuits and political infighting can cause the CEQA process to drag out. “Geary Bus Rapid Transit took ten years to environmentally clear.”

Screenshot from 2022-03-31 12-37-38
Jason Baker, Melinda Hue, Laura Tolkoff, Bay Area Council’s Gwen Litvak, and  Scott Wiener during Thursday’s SPUR panel

That’s why Wiener authored S.B. 288 in 2020, to create exemptions from CEQA for transportation-related projects. That’s allowed San Francisco to take huge strides forward in its efforts to get bike lanes, slow streets, and transit and pedestrian improvements in quickly.

The problem is S.B. 288 expires this year. So Wiener authored S.B. 922, to extend the exemptions through 2030 to allow SFMTA and the state’s other transportation agencies to keep building.

SFMTA has already installed a slew of previously languishing projects thanks to S.B 288. “The first S.B. 288 project was in the Bayview,” explained Melinda Hue, who handles environmental reviews for SFMTA. “The first project [on Evans] was a road diet, with bicycle and ped improvements.”

She said the changes were based on community outreach that started in 2018 to develop a community-based transportation plan. “Being able to take advantage of 288 for this project really saved a lot of time and money,” she said, adding that it helped build trust with a skeptical community that presumes the city will take an inordinate amount of time to get anything done.

Screenshot from 2022-03-31 12-55-55

It also let them implement bike lanes and improved crossings in the Tenderloin on Leavenworth and Golden Gate, various slow streets, and transit-only lanes in months instead of years. And, as seen in the lead image, “We also used S.B. 288 for the Central Embarcadero safety project,” she added.

Another view of the Embarcadero. Photo: SFMTA
Another view of the Embarcadero. Photo: SFMTA

“It lets agencies focus on safety instead of litigation,” explained SPUR’s Laura Tolkoff, who lead the discussion. She stressed that without it–and its extension under S.B. 922–SFMTA will be forced to back off its pace of recent improvements.

But S.B. 922 is more than just an extension, explained Jason Baker of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group. He added that they learned enough from the past two years to tweak the law. “It’s for inherently environmentally friendly projects. So we can help attract more riders, reduce pollution, and involve broader communities–not just those who can afford lawyers.”

As Tolkoff laid out, the extension will also allow suburban areas to take advantage of the exemptions. She created the list below, with some of the additional exemptions in 922 shown in blue:

Screenshot from 2022-03-31 12-48-53

Forcing a bike lane to go through an exhaustive environmental review was always bizarre and counterproductive. S.B. 288 proved that exemptions from CEQA are needed and extending the law should be a no-brainer. But it also means legislators and advocates have to keep working on larger, more comprehensive CEQA reforms, so reducing emissions and improving safety on the streets isn’t so arduous that it results in unnecessary misery and loss of life.

Going forward, “Let’s save lives instead of doing studies,” said Tolkoff.

For more events like these, visit SPUR’s events page.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

SF Planning Commission Officially Prioritizes Humans over Cars

|
Late last week, the San Francisco Planning Commission unanimously adopted a resolution to replace “Level of Service” (LOS) with “Vehicle Miles Traveled” (VMT). That’s bureaucratese for measuring a project’s overall effect on moving people, instead of just counting automobiles. As explained in a previous post, environmental law has long forced transportation planners to grade projects […]

SF Agencies Take Aim at Bureaucratic Obstacles to a Transit-First City

|
San Francisco agencies are developing a wide-ranging program to streamline the funding and construction of improvements for walking, bicycling, and transit. The Transportation Sustainability Program (TSP) would reform the city’s transportation practices in three key areas: by eliminating reliance on the automobile-centric measuring stick known as Level of Service (LOS), by instituting a system of […]

Is the Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project in Jeopardy?

|
Photo: plug1 If the Geary Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project doesn’t get some love from advocates and the general public, the project could be in trouble, according to several people closely following the process. "I look to the left, I look to the right, all I see is opposition and criticism," says Joel Ramos, a […]

At 40 Years, San Francisco’s Transit-First Policy Still Struggles for Traction

|
The first private automobile users on early 20th-century American streets were generally accorded no special privileges on the public right-of-way. “The center of the road was reserved for streetcars, and the new automobiles had to move out of the way,” as Renee Montagne describes it in the 1996 documentary Taken for a Ride, which chronicles […]