Eyes on the Street: Hellscape on Hesperian
Alameda County's Hesperian Boulevard Project in San Lorenzo is a sop pretending to be a multi-modal, safety project
Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.
Alameda County’s Public Works Agency is holding a ribbon cutting on Saturday for its newly completed “Hesperian Boulevard Corridor Improvement Project,” billed as a “Major Infrastructure Improvement Project” that runs a half-mile from I-880 to West A Street. From the County’s release on the work:
The Project implements multimodal transportation improvements with enhanced safety features including advanced traffic light technology, wider sidewalks and bike lanes, as well as high visibility crosswalks and lighting. When completed, motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and residents within this San Lorenzo community will enjoy a revitalized, safe and accessible commercial corridor.
Rather than wait for the opening, Streetsblog decided to take a bike tour of the project Monday.
And as the lead photo suggests, Alameda County staff have again lived up to their well-earned reputation for not having a clue how to build a multi-modal corridor. This is yet another tragically missed opportunity to make a road safe for all users.
If the lead photo doesn’t prove that on its own, check out the bike racks above. Streetsblog didn’t know whether to laugh or cry. Behind this position is a parking lot and across that are some shops. But this is basically an approach ramp to the freeway. It isn’t even close to a bus stop. Why put bike parking here?
That’s the point of this project: to pretend to be multi-modal, when it’s really just about car throughput and, to be charitable, a bit of sprucing up of a dangerous, high-speed, surface-level freeway.
The marquee aspect of this project is the supposedly protected intersection at Hesperian and West A. Street. But even here, the county only protected two of the four corners.
Bike East Bay’s Robert Prinz explained in an email to Streetsblog: “Protected intersections with missing corners aren’t unheard of elsewhere. Of the 19 protected intersections I’m aware of in the East Bay, 12 have four corners, 1 has three corners, 3 have two corners, and 3 have only one protected corner. This is usually because the extra corners are not needed like when a 2-way cycletrack meets an intersection, or for junctions of one-way streets. But at this Hesperian intersection the missing corners are to prioritize car movements, not for any bike safety or connectivity reasons.” [Emphasis added]
But even the protected corner shown above is the bare minimum, as seen from this view below, which has the auto turning pocket aimed right into cyclists. Alameda County managed to create a new street treatment: a mixing zone protected corner:
This combines all the disadvantages of a mixing zone intersection and a protected intersection. The other protected corner is tiny for an intersection of this scale and isn’t much better:
Streetsblog submits that this doesn’t even qualify as a protected intersection. “Going southbound on Hesperian is particularly bad because the county built a new buffered bike lane in that direction coming all the way down from the 880 interchange, but then ended it just a block before W A Street to make room for the double left turn lanes. As such there was no room left to fit a protected corner. Until the bike lanes continue on Hesperian south of W A Street there probably won’t be much call for that 2-stage bike turn movement, but ending the bike lane before the intersection is still very bad,” added Prinz.
And what about the other intersections on the project, not to mention the gutter-pan bike lanes themselves, which are just striped? Those all have zero protection.
Well, almost. There are only two positives to say about this project: a couple of the bus stops have bike channels:
But this just highlights the missed opportunity–if the county was redoing the sidewalk, why not add a sidewalk-level protected bike lane, as nearby Fremont did on Walnut? Why dump cyclists right back into an unprotected gutter on a six-lane stroad where cars and trucks are hurtling past at freeway speeds?
The county also painted better crosswalks with minimal pedestrian refuge islands:
These islands, while welcome, are still pretty minimal for a road this wide and fast–they’re not going to stop a drunk driver or a wreck from mashing a pedestrian, despite the yellow straws to warn clueless motorists not to crash into the curb. And the levels-of-service inspired turning cycles mean huge, multi-stage waits and beg buttons to get across.
There are also some bioswales and corner extensions. But to return again to the lead image, there are plenty of places where pedestrians are banned completely.
But the sidewalk stencils are nice.
All in all, this project proves that Alameda County Public Works is staffed by people who have no real interest in equity or designing a multimodal corridor. They could have done something really transformational here, but instead they mostly slapped some paint on a stroad to try and make it look like a multimodal corridor. If they’d wanted to actually make one, they didn’t even have to go to the Netherlands to learn how–Fremont already showed how to retrofit sprawling suburbs dominated by huge, multi-lane roads.
More photos of this project below: