Skip to Content
Streetsblog San Francisco home
Log In
Elderly & Disabled

Media Too Often Blame the Victim in Pedestrian Crashes

4:16 PM PST on January 15, 2009

Geary_crosswalk.jpgAt-grade pedestrian crossing on Geary Blvd

The SF Examiner published an excellent editorial from Walk San Francisco Director Manish Champsee today that calls on the city and the media to improve conditions for pedestrians and not immediately blame the victim in crashes.  When a vehicle killed 87-year-old Victor Cinti in mid-December, the Examiner ran a front-page headline "Jaywalker Killed."  Sells papers, sure, but the headline and the article missed the details of the story and found culpability where they shouldn't, argues Champsee.

The solution to avoid this kind of tragedy at intersections with apedestrian bridge is not to crack down on “jaywalkers,” but rather toallow people to cross at street level. We also need to calm the trafficin this area and make it more inviting to people walking at streetlevel, rather than trying to separate people from the street.

Though papers like the Examiner aren't likely to be sensitive to subtleties, it added insult to death by running an online poll with the article asking readers whether the police should crack down on jaywalkers. 

The jaywalker in question was an elderly man who used a walker, both of which were strewn in the middle of the street in the original grisly photo run by the paper.  No attention was paid to why Cinti would have calculated that the risk of crossing the busy street was preferable to using the pedestrian bridge over Geary Boulevard at the scene of the crash.

Cinti was killed on the west side of the street, while the bridge ison east side. This means that in order for Cinti to have used thebridge he would have had to cross Webster Street twice just to crossGeary Boulevard on the bridge, in addition to climbing up to cross.That’s a lot of extra effort for someone using a walker.

Ifthe intersection of Geary and Webster allowed crossing at the streetlevel, city standards would dictate more time to cross than what iscurrently the case. They would also dictate pedestrian countdownsignals, along with pedestrian refuge islands in the medians, sosomeone who couldn’t cross the entire length of the street in one lightcycle could continue at the next cycle.

Flickr photo: awcole72

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog San Francisco

Seamless Bay Area Five Years Later

Two of the founders of the Bay Area's advocacy group dedicated to fare integration and rational schedules talk about a half-decade of fighting for better transit and what's likely to happen in the next five years.

December 7, 2023

Support Streetsblog San Francisco

Reader donations make up a big portion of Streetsblog SF's operating budget, so if you support our work please consider donating today!

December 7, 2023
See all posts