Skip to content
Sponsored

Thanks to our advertising sponsor -

Valencia Signals Re-timed to Improve Traffic Flow and Safety

As Streetsblog San Francisco reported last month, cities around the world have timed their traffic signals to favor slower moving modes, and now San Francisco has started a trial on one of the busiest bicycle routes in the city, Valencia Street.
v.jpg

As Streetsblog San Francisco reported last month, cities around the world have timed their traffic signals to favor slower moving modes, and now San Francisco has started a trial on one of the busiest bicycle routes in the city, Valencia Street.

On Thursday February 19th, the MTA re-timed six traffic signals from 16th to 21st, a pilot for a few weeks that will enable the agency to gauge the real-world impacts of reduced speeds on traffic flow.

The main goal is to improve vehicle flow and calm traffic to prevent energy intensive starting and stopping. The slower synchronized timing will also likely prove to be a great convenience to cyclists along the route.

Motorists are already seeing a benefit. Initial studies show
the re-timed signals improve overall travel time by more than a minute during peak commute hours.
Additionally, motorists will save gas and reduce pollution if they
drive at a steady 15 mph pace.

In 2002, Portland, Oregon implemented a citywide traffic signal optimization project,
which saves motorists over 1,750,000 gallons of gas and 15,460 tons of
CO2 each year. It cost $533,000, paid for by the Climate Trust of Oregon carbon offset program. The majority of streets in downtown Portland are timed at 12-15 mph for pedestrian safety and optimal traffic flow.

Untitled_2.jpgUK DOT statistics on vehicle/pedestrian collisions

In Amsterdam,
both trams and buses save time from signal re-timing. On average
trams move 1.5 minutes faster and buses 3 minutes faster.

This is expected to benefit pedestrians as well. Studies show
the severity of pedestrian
injuries in crashes with cars increases exponentially with only slight
increases in vehicle speed. Pedestrians face a 5 percent chance of
dying when hit by a vehicle traveling 20 mph, though that figure jumps
to 45 percent for a vehicle going 30
mph and 85 percent at 40 mph.

Flickr Photo: pbo31 

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog San Francisco

Spirit’s Shutdown Exposes America’s Fragile Travel System

May 21, 2026

‘Bike to Wherever Day’ Debrief: Participation Counts Up from Last Year

May 21, 2026

Talking Headways Podcast: Greensboro’s Downtown Greenway

May 21, 2026
See all posts