Supervisor Dufty Blasts SFPD Over MTA Work Orders


Supervisor Bevan Dufty, armed with numbers and documents he obtained detailing MTA work orders from other city departments, scolded two members of the San Francisco Police Department’s top brass Wednesday, calling the department’s raid on Muni’s budget "excessive" and "unbelievable."

Dufty called the hearing before the Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee to examine why other departments are charging the MTA for work orders that will total $83 million by the end of 2010. The SFPD’s tally is the largest, at nearly $19 million.

Dufty questioned why the SFPD is charging the MTA for services like vehicle
stops to enforce traffic statutes, injury crashes, dignitary escorts
and traffic direction for demonstrations and special events, amounting to 87 percent of the department’s bills to the MTA, which is facing one of its most severe budget crises.

"When I asked the Budget Analyst’s Office, they couldn’t find another jurisdiction locally in which a transit agency is paying the cost for their police traffic function," said Dufty, addressing the SFPD’s Chief Financial Officer, Ken Bukowski. "So, can you enlighten me as to why this is happening and on what basis you think 87 percent is a reasonable proportion of costs to Muni?"

"I just don’t feel that the traffic company’s mission and services are 87 percent related to what Muni is doing. I think that this is really excessive."

Bukowski responded: "It’s based on our historical relationship between the police department and when we used to have DPT (Department of Parking and Traffic) underneath the police department and at that point in time revenue from DPT paid for traffic operations. DPT transferred to MTA and that relationship continued after it was transferred to MTA."

But Dufty pointed out revenue generated from traffic citations since last September has generated more than $23.6 million dollars, which is more than enough money to pay for the traffic detail.

"I just don’t feel that the traffic company’s mission and services are 87 percent related to what Muni is doing. I think that there’s a portion of it but I think that this is really excessive, and I think you’re gettng two bites of the apple because the general fund, which is largely what supports the police department, is deriving a significant amount of revenue from moving violations."

Supervisor David Campos agreed with Dufty, saying "it doesn’t make sense." 

Bukowski said it was ultimately a decision left to the Mayor’s office. Advocates have criticized the Mayor for allowing other departments to tap into the MTA’s budget, which also covers the salaries of some of his top officials.

IMG_2816.jpgSupervisor David Campos (foreground) is worried very little will change at the SFPD. Pictured from left are Supervisors Carmen Chu, Ross Mirkarimi and Bevan Dufty.  Photos by Bryan Goebel.

Muni Patrols

Dufty also questioned why patrols that are supposed to be provided for the T-Third along the Third Street transit corridor involve officers on overtime, and he pointed to a general consensus among many riders that police are rarely seen on Muni despite rules to the contrary.

The SFPD’s Bus Inspection Program requires each sergeant in a patrol division and each officer "assigned to a radio car" to make two transit inspections per shift. Officers on foot patrol are required to make at least four inspections per shift.

"I’ve been clear for months and months that I don’t think officers are riding the system. It is frustrating to me that within a paramilitary organization we don’t seem to have the discipline to ensure that officers are riding," he said. "I’ve been through four whistle blower complaints about the Muni Response Team, in terms of how they’re conducting business, and I’ve had people tell me they’ve been riding for 10 years and never seen a police officer get on or off a vehicle." 

Dufty said he told Police Chief Heather Fong that if a general resistance to patrolling public transit is embedded in the culture of the SFPD that officers fresh out of the academy should be required to ride Muni for three to six months "so they have a different orientation than what we’re dealing with. I just think it’s so unacceptable." His comments were followed by applause.

SFPD Commander Sandra Tong, who oversees the Muni Response Team (composed of eight officers and one sergeant), said officers are told to patrol Muni, however, "there are many other things we asked them to do on a daily basis during their shifts."

"It’s something that we want them to do, but obviously our first responsibility when you’re a police officer is answering those calls for service, traffic enforcement, foot patrols and a whole other host of things."

But Dufty reiterated SFPD is not doing it’s job when it comes to patrolling Muni. "I don’t think it reflects well on the police department that you can’t make the commitments that you’ve made and that you’re getting paid for."

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi said there needs to be some kind of quality control assurance system in place on lines such as the T-Third.  

"If MTA is going to pay for SFPD to be riding that line, then we want to know absolutely that we’re getting our money’s worth."

Campos said he’s frustrated the police department has not become aggressive patrolling Muni. He said the SFPD was told at a Police Commission hearing last year that it needed to beef up patrols. He’s worried very little will change.

"A lot of money is being provided to the police department by Muni," said Campos. "Are we going to be back where we are today, six months from now, a year from now, talking about the same thing? Because it’s not like the police department hasn’t known what the problem areas are."

Where is the MTA Board’s Leadership?

IMG_2805.jpgMTA Board Chair Tom Nolan testifies before the committee.

In testimony before the committee, MTA Board Chair Tom Nolan promised to get to the bottom of the work orders problem.

"It’s 10 percent of our entire budget. If we didn’t have any of those work orders we wouldn’t be talking about service reductions, at all."

He pointed out that many MTA Board members have recently expressed concern and the agency is planning an audit.

"I think it’s a good time to look at every dollar that is being spent [on work orders],
and I don’t have the confidence, I will tell you right now, that every
dollar is being spent on Muni," he said, responding to a question from Campos about whether he feels confident the money is being spent on public transit.

Campos responded: "Well, that’s a real problem, I think, if the head of the Board is not able to make that statement then it shows you we need to look very carefully at how this money is being expended."

Dufty admonished MTA directors, saying they need to more closely scrutinize the orders from here on out.

"I really think that it’s time for the MTA Board to stand up and insist that whether it’s the police department, whether it’s 311, whether it’s the real estate department or whatever it is, that there is a need for better justification and a demonstration that these services should be charged to the MTA and if they’re charged to the MTA that services are actually being provided."

Mirkarimi questioned Nolan about what kind of structure may be in place to examine the work orders "if you’re not getting the service you’re paying for."

"I’m not sure there is one," said Nolan.

Mirkarimi said he fears the MTA Board is "going to constantly be coming back as an appointed body to the Board [of Supervisors] to
help us try to figure out why these bumps in the road are not being reconciled."

He said he cautiously supported Proposition A, which gave the MTA Board more power, and wonders whether it wouldn’t be better for MTA directors to be elected rather than appointed by the Mayor to enhance independence and accountability, a statement that drew applause from the audience.

Where was the MTA’s Top Brass?

Noticeably absent from yesterday’s hearing were MTA Executive Director Nat Ford and Chief Financial Officer Sonali Bose. MTA Media Relations Manager Judson True, who also acts a liason to the Board of Supervisors, was sent in their absence. Some supervisors on the committee were outraged.

"I have to say that given that we’re talking about issues clearly of a financial nature I’m surprised that the CFO of the MTA wouldn’t be here to talk about these things. You had the CFO of the police department here," said Campos, addressing True. "That’s what’s really disappointing about this presentation."

Mirkarimi went a step further, asking True, "Was the CFO told to stand down and not be here?"

"Not to my knowledge, no," True responded.

Mirkarimi said that because of the absence, supervisors were left at a disadvantage. 

In an interview, Ford said he was unable to attend the hearing because it was called "pretty late in the week last week" and he had to attend a planned meeting on the budget for MTA employees.

"I needed to focus on getting out there and talking to our employees about what was discussed in the Board meeting yesterday," said Ford. He didn’t mention if Bose took part in the same meeting.

We talked to Ford about the work orders and we’ll have more later in an exclusive Streetscast interview.

  • In 1999, Prop E, amongst other things, carved the MTA out as its own agency, independent of control by the Mayor and Board of Supervisors,s imilar to the Planning Department, which was similarly excised by the voters from exclusive Mayoral control in 2001, notwithstanding the will of the voters expressed at the ballot box, the chiefs of both departments see themselves as employees of the Mayor and direct their departments administratively as such.

    Was the leadership of the MTA ordered to stand down? Were they ordered to carry water for the Mayor which they did not feel comfortable carrying? Or did they just give the Board of Supervisors the bureaucratic finger? Is the evidence of absence the absence of evidence?

    It must be taken as a given right now that Gavin Newsom is using San Francisco’s city government as a trampoline to higher ambition, and that plays like charging the kitchen sink to Muni, like attacking the unions and city employees, like opposing progressive tax increases, like the war on voter approved set-asides must all be analyzed in that context.

    Dufty likewise is not without ambition, and moves like this, breaking publicly with the Mayor on a high profile populist issue, bolster the progressive/enviro flank of the guy who just voted to give Gus Murad a corrupt height bonus and praised Traffic Division Captain Greg Corrales, who is about to get whacked with his 13th or so disciplinary action for speaking to the press about Fajitagate (he’s already cost the City $270K in settlements for stunts like punching a motorist on the Golden Gate Bridge, and will earn like $170K/yr on retirement forever) probably not because the Supervisor believes that the Captain is doing hunky dory making the streets safer for cyclists and peds. No matter what the motive, I’m glad that Bevan held this hearing, did the homework and scored the points.

    The soiled backdrop of all of this is Prop E, which hasn’t even succeeded at protecting the set aside and must be revisited at the ballot box. I see a tripartite alliance between riders, operators and the TWU, and enviro advocates as the best vehicle for bringing to the ballot the kind of comprehensive change to the Muni governance structure that this crisis demonstrates is needed. Many elements of reform have been discussed over the past few years, often during the harried Charter Amendment process,which tends to produce crap that we lose 2:1 on. We’d do well to build a community consensus capable of running (strategizing and financing) a grassroots contested Charter Amendment campaign behind a set of reforms that are then brought to the supervisors.

    My general outline of reform is as follows: In our system of government, the legislature makes the “what” decisions and the executive makes the “how” decisions. The “hows” of the Muni need to be put into a budgetary strong box for operations and maintenance, while the “whats” of Muni and the streetscape need to be more politically determined as in a city 85% built out, there are no academically correct answers to these inherently political questions.

    I’d sever the Muni from the rest of the MTA to keep focus on the lock box part, on running a transit system well. DPT, bike, ped and DPW street function would be overseen by a Livable Streets Commission, composed of 3 appointees of each of the Mayor (motorist, small business person, disabled person) and Board of Supervisors (pedestrian, cyclist, senior) and one appointee by the Muni Board to facilitate coordination. I’m cool with expanding the MTA Board to 11 members and electing them by supervisorial district, creating and redistricting 7 districts would involve too many moving parts. The Livable Streets Commission would also gain an annual set-aside over time equivalent to the dollar amount of the capital cost of the streetscape divided by its useful lifetime so that the most simple of our capital assets can be kept in a state of good repair, obviating the need to go into hock for a quick, temporary fix.


  • I ride the T-Third somewhat often between 23rd St. and downtown, and I don’t remember ever having seen a police officer on board. However, I have seen a few drug deals go down…

  • Evan, I think some of those $11 million T-Line patrols are under cover.

    I’m loosing any and all respect for the SFPD, they don’t even seem to be able to figure out how a mafia protection racket works. When you demand money for protection, and the mark actually gives it to you, you need to provide at least some level of protection. And you’re only supposed to hurt them when they refuse to pay.

    But since the SFPD can’t pull off organized crime right, I’m guessing they’ll be easy marks. So I think I have a way to solve this entire budget deficit:

    The SFPD have a lot of patrol cars, patrol cars which block traffic, take up parking spaces, delay transit, etc. and if they’re going to place a burden on Muni, then they should have to compensate them for it. Let’s pass a law banning SFPD patrol cars on city streets without a special MTA police car permit. If you set the permits at, let’s say, $1 million each, then we’ll completely solve the MTA budget problems.

    Or is stooping to the same tactics as the SFPD does to low?

  • John

    We all know why CFO Bose was told not to attend the hearing. The awesome Sonali, never shy to tell it like it is, would have exposed the ludicrous raiding of MTA’s budget by other departments, as orchestrated by Newsom’s office–in blatant defiance of Prop A.

    This year, like in the past, SFPD will charge MTA for the “invisible” officers patroling Muni buses. New this year, SFPD will charge MTA for its traffic enforcement detail, because this is a “transportation function.” Of course, SFPD will continue to collect the citation revenue, as well as the deployment of traffic officers. What a joke!

  • Dale

    Security on board Muni is a growing issue, so thanks for covering the Muni Response Team. I’m glad that Sup. Campos is concerned about safety on Muni. Still, I don’t know that putting a small number of SFPD patrols on busses is ever going to have an impact, even if they do show up for the patrols the way they are supposed to. I’d love to some extra security on some of the east-west busses I rely on, esp. the 5-Fulton and 31-Balboa, and maybe they need to be MTA staff, not police officers.

  • The transit advocacy community needs to come together around a nominee for the Police Commission that can bring the livable streets agenda to bear on SFPD enforcement.

    It’s been six years since we passed Prop H, and it is now high time.


  • DaveO

    “Campos said he’s frustrated the police department has not become more aggressive patrolling Muni. He said the SFPD was told at a Police Commission hearing last year that it needed to beef up patrols. He’s worried very little will change.”

    And if SFPD actually WAS doing “aggressive patrolling” on Muni, then Campos would be the first to complain about “police state tactics” and infringing on civil liberties and such.

  • DaveO: Point of clarification. Campos did not suggest SFPD was aggressive on Muni. That was my wording. I’ve eliminated the word “more.”

  • Will Johnson

    NO, NO, NO! Everything wrong with the MTA and Muni is the drivers fault. Remember?


MTA To Get Greater Management Role Over SFPD’s Traffic Company

Flickr photo: Thomas Hawk According to a "fact sheet" (PDF) released by the Mayor’s office Friday, "new operational improvements and efficiencies" have been identified that will amount to $3.5 million in cost savings for the MTA, including giving MTA Executive Director Nat Ford more power over the SFPD’s Traffic Company. The plan, first reported in […]

Supes Committee Votes to Recommend Rejection of MTA Budget

Supervisor David Campos with BOS Prez David Chiu and Supervisor Bevan Dufty in background at yesterday’s Budget and Finance Committee meeting. Photos by Bryan Goebel. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee voted 4-1, with Supervisor Carmen Chu dissenting, to recommend the rejection of the MTA’s $778 million budget following a marathon […]

MTA Budget Hearing Today

Flickr photo: Steve Rhodes The MTA holds its first public hearing today on its proposals to raise fares, fines, fees and reduce service. The agency is facing a $129 million deficit and proposing eliminating up to nine bus routes and reducing service on at least 29 other routes. The hearing is part of the MTA […]

MTA Releases MOU with SFPD

A rare sighting of an SFPD officer on Muni. Flickr photo: moppet65535 More than a month after it was promised, the MTA has released a memorandum of understanding (PDF) with the San Francisco Police Department, an agreement that will give the transit agency and its chief Nat Ford control over SFPD officers who are supposed […]

Calls For Greater 311, MTA Efficiency

From rick via Flickr While the list of budget problems facing the MTA is long, Supervisor Bevan Dufty believes he can save them a few million just by changing the way they do customer service. In a special hearing on work orders to the MTA yesterday, Dufty proposed that the MTA come up with a […]

Slow Progress in Curbing SFMTA’s Costly Overtime and Work Orders

As the SFMTA struggles to provide reliable Muni service, little headway has been made in curbing the amount it spends on staff overtime and work orders issued to other departments. Supervisors David Campos and David Chiu, who held a hearing on both issues yesterday, say the continued the lack of transparency and accountability is frustrating. […]