Caltrain Staff Floats Idea to Charge Bicyclists Extra to Ride Trains

caltrain_bike.jpgFlickr photo: richardmasoner

It’s bad enough Caltrain already has an image of being unfriendly to bicyclists, despite its efforts to prevent bumps on the system by boosting bicycle capacity on its trains, now comes this word: Staff is toying with the idea of making bicyclists pay a $1 surcharge that would raise an estimated $800,000.

How the surcharge would be collected is anyone’s guess, and it may not even be legal, according to some commenters on the San Franciscio Bicycle Coalition’s public listserve.

Mark Simon, special assistant to the CEO at Caltrain, stressed it’s just an idea, and not a formal proposal. But in an interview with Streetsblog San Francisco, he explained it this way:

"A cyclist takes up two seats. One for where the cyclist is sitting and one for the bike, and there’s always been a question among some people about whether or not a bicyclist is already subsidized because they’re getting to use two seats for the price of one. We hear more frequently about how much we subsidize parking lots and I think that’s one of the things we’re going to analyze because I don’t think we subsidize parking lots quite to the degree that everybody seems to say we do. But there is a school of thought that bicyclists are subsidized too and more than they realize."

Marc Caswell, the program manager at the SFBC, isn’t buying it:

Without bicyclists on Caltrain, the trains
would be empty and per rider subsidies would go up, not down.  Unless
there are capacity issues among all riders, penalizing riders for
biking should be the last option. If Mr. Simon is correct that Caltrain
does not currently have those numbers available, I would be curious to
know how the $20 monthly parking pass was formulated.

At today’s Caltrain Board of Directors meeting, staff also put several options for dealing with a $10 million deficit on the table, including raising fares, eliminating weekend service and scaling back mid-day service. From the San Jose Mercury News:

Riders would take
an estimated 1 million fewer trips but the agency would save $2 million
under that scenario. Caltrain currently operates 16 trains on
Saturdays and 14 on Sundays.

Caltrain will also discuss reducing
midday weekday service from about every 30 minutes to hourly, Harvey
said. By doing so Caltrain would save $2.5 million but riders would
take 100,000 to 200,000 fewer trips.

A public hearing will be held June 4th.


Caltrain to Present Plan to Increase Bicycle Capacity

Caltrain claims it "values bicycle commuters." In its goals and objectives the agency says "Caltrain must be a competitive alternative to traveling by automobile." That goal will be tested tomorrow when the agency presents its final plan to increase bicycle capacity on Caltrain to the Board of Directors. Advocates are frustrated it isn’t being made […]

Caltrain to Update Its Plan to Increase Bike Capacity

Johnson isn’t fond of the shorter bike racks on Caltrain. It’s been one month since the Caltrain Board of Directors approved a plan to increase bicycle capacity on its trains, a move advocates welcomed but felt didn’t go far enough because it won’t entirely prevent bicyclists from getting bumped. Tomorrow, the Caltrain board is expected […]

Caltrain Will Boost Bicycle Capacity But It’s Still Not Enough

Although capacity is increasing, bicyclists will continue to get left behind at Caltrain stations. Caltrain’s Board of Directors has approved a plan to improve bicycle capacity that is a step beyond staff’s recommendations but will it be enough to keep bicycle commuters from getting bumped? No. Still, advocates were pleased with yesterday’s decision to increase […]

Advocates say Bicycle Riders Could Save Caltrain from Service Cuts

Photo: sfbike With Caltrain facing a $2.3 million deficit, and its governing board considering service cuts and fare hikes, bicycle advocates from three Bay Area counties who have been leading the call for more bicycle capacity have calculated that the commuter rail line could stave off reductions if it would just accommodate the increasing demand […]