Board of Supes Votes Again Not to Reject MTA Budget

david_chiu.jpgBOS Prez David Chiu, who voted not to reject: "It is time for us to move forward." Photo by Bryan Goebel.

The Board of Supervisors, for the second time this month, voted 6-5 this afternoon against a motion to reject the MTA’s $778 million budget. BOS Prez David Chiu and Sophie Maxwell were among those not supporting a rejection. The vote came despite Supervisor John Avalos’ announcement that he had a commitment from MTA Chair Tom Nolan to come up with a different budget if supervisors rejected it.

Transit advocates, frustrated over the decision, said they are planning
to rally behind Avalos’ proposed charter amendment to
reform the MTA Board, which is appointed by the Mayor. They felt a rejection of the budget was the only way to force a better plan, which they say is unfairly balanced, with riders taking a bigger hit than drivers. 

But Chiu, who pointed out that he rides Muni more than any other supervisor and is the only member of the Board who doesn’t own a car, said "we have come quite a ways" since the first MTA budget was proposed. He said the upcoming debate over the city budget is going to "make this debate look like child’s play."

"In fact, as I’ve done the math, we’ve come about 30 million dollars from where the original budget was," said Chiu, who proposed the original rejection motion. "It is time for us to move forward."

Chiu’s office said the $30 million he was referring to is a $15 million reduction in work orders, the $10.3 million worked out in a compromise, and $5 million in anticipated parking revenues, assuming the MTA moves forward with stronger parking enforcement. 

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, in an interview after the vote, said he believed it was still possible to get the MTA to make more concessions because "a strong message has been sent," but said he is going to back Avalos’ charter amendment, which could appear before voters as soon as November, assuming there are six votes on the Board to place it on the ballot. The amendment would see three members of the MTA Board appointed by the Board of Supervisors, three by the Mayor and one elected.

Supervisor David Campos, who criticized the MTA and its Chief Nat Ford for not following through on any of the recommendations in the proposed "Transit Justice Package," called today’s vote a loss for Muni riders.

"I think while this budget is better than the original budget it is one that can be much better and I’m disappointed in the Board of Supervisors for not pushing the envelope to push Muni to do the right thing," he said, adding that he feels the one good thing that came out of the process was Avalos’ proposed charter amendment.

"I don’t think this would have happened if we had a truly independent MTA Board that deliberated without any political pressure, so it points for the need to move forward on that as quick as we can."

Ford pledged during testimony before the Board that the MTA would not make any further service cuts or fare increases other than what’s been proposed. He said he would need 90 days to study the possibility of beefing up parking enforcement on Sundays and evenings before taking a plan to the MTA Board.

Asked by Streetsblog whether putting parking enforcement back on the table was a real possibility considering opposition from the Mayor (even if a study were to favor it), Ford responded: "I think that’s premature at this point to assume that. I think, if we have a reasonable plan that takes into account all the impacts, I have found with the Mayor as well as the Board of Supervisors that they’ve been supportive of some of those suggestions we’ve made and in this case we need a little bit of time."

Tom Radulovich, the executive director of Livable City, said today’s decision continues to raise questions in his mind about whether the MTA, as it exists, is really working.

"They’re not delivering any of the service they’ve promised to, in terms of on-time performance. There’s a provision of the charter which says the MTA Board shall deligently seek new revenue sources, not just fare increases, but new revenue sources to support Muni operations. We’ve not seen them act very deligently in the 10 year history of the MTA. They’ve been pretty chicken and more often than not have gone to the riders."

  • “Transit Justice Package”. That’s fine, but whatever. The time is now to get *everyone* on the bus, and if *everyone* is demanding better MUNI service, we can make it happen. And that’s good for those who need transit justice.

    I’m far from transit dependent – I have the money to buy a car if I want, I have two decent legs to bike or walk, etc… I just want good transit because that’s a large part of how I *want* to get around. The alliance between those who need and those who want can be very very strong. I’m pretty sure I’m not alone. I actually think couching this as a justice issue reduces the strength of the argument.

  • Lame and disappointing. Think of all the money Muni riders would have to contribute to these Supes’ campaigns if we weren’t shelling out an extra $10 a month for a Fast Pass.

  • marcos

    I’ve given up on getting people on the American left to cast a wide net. So many are steeped in the culture of fetishizing the worst off to the expense of likely un-poor allies. This is a trait unique to the American left and is bolstered by the reliance on nonprofits to carry so much burden which equates to an amplified political voice to those who get funding which can never compete with the corporate interests which fabricate empty suits like Newsom to ensure that they always get paid.


  • I’m glad to see many of the TEP service improvements have been put back in place with this budget. Good for the city; good for the planet. We need to make Muni work well enough to lure people out of their cars. If Muni is miserably crowded and infrequent, it could be free and people still would not take it. Accelerated climate change is the most serious threat we will ever face. This is less about social justice and more about the ultimate survival of the human race.

  • SfResident

    Hey… anybody seen the MOU between the MTA and the SFPD yet?

  • David Schneider

    The Supervisors were silent once again over taking up Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood on his comment that he is open to funding bus system operating expenses — not just capital expenses.
    Further, although some of them allegedly met with Pelosi a few months ago, they were also silent about asking her to introduce an omnibus local transit funding bill – – seems that’s at least as high a priority as bailing out AIG.

    — Dave Schneider

  • marcos

    I’d written up a resolution which would have the SF Board of Supervisors call on the feds to provide transit operating subsidy, shopped it around to a few supervisors earlier this year, and nobody bit.



Can the Board of Supes Still Force a Better MTA Budget?

Budget and Finance Committee file photo by Bryan Goebel The Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee voted for a second time Wednesday to reject the MTA budget and send it back to the full Board. It followed a narrow vote by the full Board Tuesday to table BOS Prez David Chiu’s original rejection motion, […]

MTA Budget Facing Likely Rejection from Board of Supervisors

BOS Prez David Chiu is concerned fares would rise while service is cut. Photo by Bryan Goebel. Support appears to be growing at City Hall for Supervisor David Chiu’s motion to reject the MTA’s budget passed last Thursday. Very little has changed to satisfy Chiu, who remains deeply concerned about fare hikes, service cuts and […]

Supes Delay Action on Motion to Reject MTA Budget

Supervisor Avalos on parking enforcement: "The more I think about how we need to do what’s best for the environment and what’s best for riders my position has changed." The Board of Supervisors will try again on an MTA budget, voting 7-4 this afternoon to delay a motion to reject it. Instead, they’ll hold a […]

Supervisor Avalos, Advocates Call for More Equitable Muni Budget

Supervisor John Avalos at Transit Justice rally. Photos by Bryan Goebel. Supervisor John Avalos, leading the charge for a Muni budget that is more equitably balanced between drivers and transit riders, was joined Monday by a broad coalition of advocates, including groups representing seniors and youth, in a rally designed to pressure the MTA into […]