Skip to Content
Streetsblog San Francisco home
Streetsblog San Francisco home
Log In

Yesterday's New York Times blog item about why New York women are underrepresented among the city's bike commuters didn't sit well with the authors of Streetsblog Network member Let's Go Ride a Bike.
Trisha, one of the blog's authors and a bike commuter herself in
Nashville, sees the piece as part of a trend (epitomized by a recent
Treehugger post called "6 Reasons the World Needs More Girls on Bikes"). Too often, she says, people looking at female cyclists take a cosmetic approach to a complex subject: 

494801835_9dba1859cf_m.jpgThis is how mothers roll in Japan: on a "mamachari." Photo by anthonygrimley via Flickr.

I
certainly don’t want to discount concerns about safety and fashion,
which were issues for me when starting out and two things Dottie and I
are trying to help others overcome.

What annoys me is that none of the articles I’ve read on this
topic lately go any deeper into why those things present serious
obstacles for women but not men, even though men have the same concerns
(no one wants to show up for work disheveled and stinky after all). Why
bother, when it’s so obvious that men are just much less self-absorbed
and a million times braver? It couldn’t be that there are higher
expectations for women’s appearances in the workplace, or that the
burden of transporting children or household errands like grocery
shopping more often falls to them—the first reasons that came to my
mind. These are not insurmountable, of course (just ask these cycling superparents, both moms and dads, or the other stylish women bike commuters we
know), but they require some thought, negotiation and planning that
your average male might not have to overcome in his quest to bicycle
commute.

But instead of giving weight to these concerns,
or looking into others, these articles stay on the surface. Women are
dismissed as frivolous and their absence is mourned not because of the
missed opportunity to allow them to discover an activity that can
improve their quality of life, but because their presence would improve
the scenery. As a girl who likes to look good on her bike, I can’t
argue with that statement, but I can argue with it being the number one
reason we should get women on bikes -- sorry, Treehugger.

Network member Fifty Car Pileup, who has written about the gender gap before, also had a thoughtful response to the Times piece.

What
makes me sad about this whole debate is that in the United States, we
tend to think of ourselves as being especially enlightened when it
comes to women's issues. Yet women here are still confronted every day
with the idea that being sweaty, or even physically active outside of a
gym, isn't feminine. If you're not worried about it yourself, you're
constantly being reminded by the media that other, "average" women are.
Transporting children by bike is almost unheard of.

Meanwhile, Dutch parents have the Bakfiets, of course. And in Japan, women ride their kids on cycles called "mamacharis," or mama chariots. Maybe we'll get there someday.

Other good things from around the network: imagineNATIVEamerica writes about the debate between New Urbanists and the proponents of sprawl; the Hard Drive reports some Oregon drivers don't see why they should have to put down their cellphones; and The MinusCar Project expects "green business" initiatives to be more than business as usual.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter