Senate Starts Climate Push With Nods to Jobs, Energy, and Transportation

7_6_09_climate_change.jpgTotal U.S. emissions in 2007, with transportation in blue at right. (Photo: FHWA)

The Senate is taking its first public steps toward combating climate
change — and while the U.S. DOT was absent from this morning’s
hearing, the chiefs of the Energy Department and Environmental
Protection Agency reminded lawmakers that transportation must play a
key role in any emissions reduction plan.

Under questioning from Sen. Benjamin Cardin (D-MD), who lamented that "transit
hasn’t gotten the attention it needs in America," both Energy Secretary
Steven Chu and EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson agreed that climate
legislation should help promote alternatives to single-passenger car

Jackson even low-balled the carbon
footprint of the nation’s transportation choices, describing cars,
trucks, and aircraft as "about 20 percent" of total U.S. emissions when
the total number is closer to one-third (see above chart).

of those fuel-burning trips, Jackson said, are commuters who drive
alone "often because they have no choice," making transportation reform
a "quality of life" issue as well as an environmental one.

seconded his fellow Cabinet member: "Increasing public transportation
use, especially in urban areas, would do a lot in terms of decreasing
our greenhouse gas emissions." Moreover, Chu added, rail is not just a
way to move people more sustainably — moving goods via freight rail
can achieve fuel efficiency greater than 400 miles per gallon, blowing trucks out of the water.

nod to transportation during today’s hearing signals that the Senate
may not relegate transit and smart growth to the third- and fourth-fiddle roles
that they played in the House climate bill. Indeed, Environment and
Public Works Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA), who will take the
lead on Senate climate legislation, recently advised transportation
reformers to "work with me on my global warming bill."

Thomas Carper (D-DE) revisited that theme, asking Chu and Jackson to
"think differently" on transportation in order to avoid political
missteps made after the energy crisis of the late 1970s prompted the nation’s first fuel-efficiency rules. The query to focus on, as Carper put it, is "how do we get ourselves to drive less?"

course, the biggest unknown in the Senate climate debate is whether
enough centrists from both parties can be won over to break an
all-but-certain GOP filibuster of the final legislation.

Climate change denier Sen. Jim Inhofe (OK), the environment committee’s senior Republican and Boxer’s erstwhile ally
on transportation, seemed to warn his California colleague that his
party would throw the kitchen sink at the climate measure. GOPers on
the panel released a joint letter to Boxer requesting a series of
hearings on actual legislative language, an attempt to cut short the intense negotiating that sparked numerous last-minute revisions to the House climate bill.

will we see the bill that you intend to mark up?" Inhofe asked Boxer
rhetorically as the hearing opened. Advocates and ordinary voters
across the country may well be asking the same question.


Senate Poised to Move on Climate Bill

Barbara Boxer (D-CA), chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, isn’t yet ready to start debating a long-term transportation bill — but she is reportedly prepared to move on climate change legislation that includes targets for diminishing auto dependence and encouraging transit use. Boxer’s panel will begin debate on its climate bill during […]

Should a Climate Bill Even Try to Fight Sprawl?

The potential for a cap-and-trade climate bill to set aside significant amounts of money for reforming local land use and transportation planning is often touted by Democrats, environmental groups, and this particular Streetsblogger. Should the approach California used in SB 375 (being signed into law above) be applied to a congressional cap-and-trade climate bill? (Photo: […]

Study: Clean-Car Subsidies Alone Can’t Meet White House’s Climate Goals

Government subsidies for hybrid and electric cars, while "politically seductive," will fail to achieve the Obama administration’s national pollution-reduction goals if they are not coupled with a significant increase in fuel prices, according to a new study by Harvard University researchers. (Photo: Pop and Politics) The team at Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and International […]