Feds Still Forcing Transit Agencies to Bow to Private Charter Buses

Streetsblog Capitol Hill reported yesterday
that the U.S. DOT would end a Bush-era mandate to reward new transit
projects for using private contractors — but a similar
pro-privatization rule for bus service remains in effect, preventing
local transit agencies from competing with private charter companies.

1fairbus0903.jpgFairgoers
in Minnesota depart a private charter bus that benefited from federal
rules barring competition with public transit agencies. (Photo: Star-Trib)

The rule, finalized last year, has forced Washington D.C.’s Metrobus to stop providing free buses to Redskins football games and blocked Indianapolis’ transit agency from offering lower-cost service to the town’s famed Indy 500 car race.

This
year, it’s Minnesota State Fair attendees who are contending with
privatized bus service that left them waiting for hours and caused
"ugly scenes," as the local Star-Tribune reports today.

The rule was intended to shield "private charter operators from unfair competition by
federally subsidized public transit agencies," as the Bush administration wrote in its initial regulatory justification. 

As
a result, public transit agencies were barred from offering bus
services to special events if a private company was able to do the job
instead. The rule prompted outcries from the American Public Transportation Association, but it has yet to be overturned by the Obama administration.

In
a June letter to senior members of the House transportation committee,
19 lawmakers — three of them Republican — asked for the rule to be
reversed in the next long-term federal infrastructure bill. From the
letter, spearheaded by Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and David Dreier (R-CA):

By
making public transit agencies ineligible to provide what has always
been considered public transit service, this ill-advised [Federal
Transit Administration] rulemaking contradicts federal goals to
encourage public transportation to alleviate traffic congestion and
improve air quality nationwide.

Charter bus service is reserved and exclusive service to
events, many of which are traditionally open only to a select group.
Service open to any member of the public to board and ride, without
advance reservation, to a public event has always been considered
public service and that definition should be restored.

That long-term infrastructure bill is likely to be delayed for at least a year at the request
of the White House, however. The question is whether the FTA is willing
to undo the pro-privatization rule on its own before the bill is taken
up.

(thanks to commenter Brad on the Transport Politic for the link)

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Proposition G and the Fix Muni Syndrome

|
As the November election draws near and the bunkers are dug on either side of San Francisco’s Proposition G, the Fix Muni Now ballot measure spearheaded by Supervisor Sean Elsbernd, the rhetoric is escalating, with Mayor Gavin Newsom, the San Francisco Chronicle’s Editorial Board and Elsbernd on one side decrying Muni operators for taking raises […]

Commentary: Proposition G and the Vision of the City

|
Editor’s note: Jason Henderson, a geography professor at San Francisco State University who writes about the politics of mobility, explains why he’s voting against Proposition G on November 2. We’ve invited the Yes on G side to write an op-ed and hope to publish it soon. A lot of well-meaning people are leaning towards voting […]
SFMTA painting the bus 'Red Carpet' lanes on Mission in the Mission a couple of years back. Photo: SFMTA.

Open Thread: Room for Private Vehicles in Red Carpet Lanes?

|
The SFMTA Board of Directors approved the next step in the $35 million Geary Rapid project on Tuesday, which includes segments of red carpet, bus-only lanes between Stanyan and downtown. The rub: the SFMTA decided to allow privately run transit, including tour buses, tech-buses, and Chariot, to also use the lane (in reality, non-Muni vehicles of […]

San Mateo County Still Thinks the Wider the Better

|
San Mateo County’s City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) is leaving an expansion of Highway 101 with new carpool lanes on the table, even after the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) concluded they will jam up with traffic the day they open. If constructed–by 2024 at the earliest–a 14-mile section of the highway from San Bruno to Redwood City would be widened from eight to […]

Six Ideas for Saving Bay Area Transit

|
[Editor’s note: This article is re-published with permission from the transit-themed March issue of The Urbanist, the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association’s (SPUR) monthly member magazine. The article, written by SPUR Regional Planning Director Egon Terplan, is based on a discussion paper developed by the SPUR Transportation Policy Board. Read the full paper at spur.org/tsp.] […]