Skip to Content
Streetsblog San Francisco home
Streetsblog San Francisco home
Log In
2009 Transportation Bill

Business Lobby to Senate: No, Stimulus Won’t Do Enough for Transport

As the Senate backs up the White House's push for an 18-month delay
in approving a new federal infrastructure bill, one of its major
arguments is that the economic stimulus law's $48 billion in
transportation money would help tide the nation over until long-term
legislation could be passed.

"The good news is
that when you add up this [18-month extension] we are passing ... and you add the stimulus funding of $30
billion that remains to be spent over the next 18 months, you get a 50
percent increase in funding for transportation," Senate environment committee chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) said in July.

But
some in Washington's business lobby -- the crowd that wielded major
influence during the Bush years and still holds sway in the Obama
administration -- disagree with that assumption.

"The
stimulus package will not carry us through," Jay Timmons, executive
vice president at the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM),
told reporters this afternoon. "It was merely a downpayment. In order
to reap the benefits of the Recovery Act, we need to continue the
investment."

Timmons, along with U.S. Chamber of Commerce
president Tom Donohue and AAA vice president Kathleen Marvaso, spoke
out to support House transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar's
(D-MN) plan for a three-month delay in crafting the next long-term bill, rather than the Senate's preferred 18-month postponement.

The
business groups' argument was simple: when the White House is heavily
invested in getting the country back on a strong economic footing, it
would be self-sabotage to delay a new transportation bill for too long.

"We
can't have the economy we want with the transportation system we have,"
Marvaso said. "Transportation funding should not be considered a
luxury."

The $48 billion in transportation stimulus aid --
just $8.4 billion of which went to transit -- comprises just six
percent of the total package's $787 billion price tag. To help pay for
more infrastructure investment, NAM and the Chamber have offered to
get behind an increase in the federal gas tax; Donohue was reluctant to
mention what size hike he was endorsing, but he said that "a penny is a
waste of time" and "40 cents [per gallon] is a big bite."

But the devil is in the details for the business lobby's gas tax advocacy. Both
Timmons and American Trucking Association chief Bill Graves said their
support would depend on how much Oberstar's new transportation bill
focused on their core priorities (read: more money for roads).

And with the Chamber undercutting its own members' climate change efforts by mounting an occasionally bizarre campaign against emissions reductions, it's far from clear that the group would support Oberstar's proposal for a minor increase
in transit's share of federal funding. The business lobby is certainly
stepping on the Senate's transportation message, but that may be all it
can get done before the extension battle comes to a close next week.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog San Francisco

Port Lobbyists Trying to Kill Bike and Pedestrian Safety in Oakland

Trucking/port lobbyists want to destroy a long-established plan to build protected bike lanes connecting Jack London Square, West Oakland, and downtown

July 11, 2024
See all posts