Chicago Commuter Rail Spends Big on Trucking

Chicago’s
commuter rail agency will be raising this bridge to help trucks pass
underneath, relying exclusively on transit funding. Photo: The
Urbanophile

Transit funding these days is, needless to say,
scarce. Across the country, transit agencies are slashing services to
cope with the gaping fiscal holes left by the recession. More than ever,
every dollar counts.

It’s in that context that a scoop by The Urbanophile’s Aaron Renn
is so jarring. In his hometown of Chicago, the commuter rail agency is
embarking on a major new capital project, with a pricetag in the
hundreds of millions, intended to help truckers, not transit riders. How
is that siphoning of transit dollars to road users being achieved?
Writes Renn:

The project in question is on the Union Pacific North Line. Metra
is undertaking a project to replace 22 bridges and rebuild the
Ravenswood station at a cost of $185 million and a timeline of eight
years (?!). The bridges are 100 years old and there’s no question they
need replacement. However, as part of this project, Metra is using
transit dollars to raise the grade of the railroad to increase vertical
clearance on the streets below it, and permanently destroying fully one
third of the transit right of way in the process.

Further elevating the bridges wouldn’t improve commuter rail
service. The purpose is to allow taller trucks to pass under the bridges
more easily. Renn continues:

I don’t philosophically object to raising the grade, but doing so
dramatically increases the cost and complexity of the project. Metra is
paying for that exclusively out of transit capital funds. One hundred
percent of the value of raising the rail grade is for trucks. It has
nothing at all to do with transit. Yet trucking and road funds aren’t
even chipping in one cent.

I’m all in favor of an integrated transportation system without all these funding stovepipes but this is ridiculous.

And to top it all off, Metra will be eliminating a currently unused
third track along the line, foreclosing the possibility of eventually
using that track to expand capacity along the route. For Chicagoland
readers understandably angry, Renn offers a “call to action” in his post
— check out the whole thing. 

More from around the network: Jarrett Walker at Human Transit asks whether San Francisco’s groundbreaking performance parking initiative might be too timid. I Bike T.O. calls out Toronto’s mayoral candidates for their anti-bike stances. And Bike Baltimore files a dispatch from a bike-friendly beach town.