Skip to content
Sponsored

Thanks to our advertising sponsor -

SFMTA Board Greenlights Push to End Free Disabled Placard Parking

Looking to end the dysfunction caused by California's failed policy of giving free parking to disabled placard holders, the SFMTA Board of Directors unanimously approved a resolution Tuesday giving agency staff the green light to pursue state legislation that would allow local jurisdictions to charge placard holders at meters.

The SFMTA and the Mayor’s Office on Disability produced this video explaining why free parking for disabled placard holders is bad policy.

Looking to end the dysfunction caused by California’s failed policy of giving free parking to disabled placard holders, the SFMTA Board of Directors unanimously approved a resolution Tuesday giving agency staff the green light to pursue state legislation that would allow local jurisdictions to charge placard holders at meters.

The policy change has been recommended by a committee comprised mostly of disability advocates that was formed to tackle the growing problem of placard abuse, which deprives legitimately disabled drivers of reserved parking spaces close to their destinations, cheats the SFMTA out of revenue, and lets drivers occupy high-demand parking spots all day with no incentive to limit their stay. Consequently, abuse of placards by non-disabled drivers is rampant.

California is one of only 15 states to exempt disabled parking placard holders from having to pay at the meter. Pursuing a change in that law is one of six recommendations made by the SFMTA’s Accessible Parking Policy Advisory Committee, but it’s the only one that the SFMTA can’t implement without approval from the state legislature. It’s currently unknown which state assembly member or senator might introduce a bill.

Bob Planthold, a senior and disability advocate who served on the SFMTA’s committee and initially opposed charging placard holders for parking at meters, pointed out that the 35 states that already do so include Florida and Arizona. “A lot of people retire and move to those states,” he said. “Those states are not having people move away because they require people to pay at the meters.”

“The placard is supposed to increase parking access for us,” he added. “The payment exemption reduces that.”

Carla Johnson, interim director of the Mayor’s Office of Disability, said extensive research from other cities has shown that to effectively make more convenient parking spaces available for disabled drivers, a set of changes — including a substantial increase in disabled-reserved blue zones and enforcement of placard abuse — must be implemented. Ending exemptions from meter payment, she said, is a key part of that.

Although the committee initially planned to seek an endorsement by the Board of Supervisors before pushing for a change in state law, Johnson said the new plan is to pursue the state legislation first. That would allow the supervisors, which would then have the state’s blessing to end the meter payment exemptions within the city, to approve the change. The soonest that such a change state law could go into effect is 2015, she said.

With disability advocates issuing the call for an end to free parking — normally a hot-button issue that can be expected to rouse fierce political resistance — the policy change appears to have very few detractors in the city. The policy change was even endorsed by the SF Chamber of Commerce.

In the above video produced by the SFMTA and the Mayor’s Office on Disability, Jessie Lorenz, executive director of the Independent Living Resource Center of San Francisco, said, “I had a neighbor once offer me 400 bucks to use my placard while he drives into the city.”

“It is seen as a way to obtain free parking,” she said.

Here are the six policy recommendations from the SFMTA’s Accessible Parking Policy Advisory Committee [PDF]:

1. Increase blue zones
2. Improve enforcement of placard misuse
3. Increase oversight of placard approvals
4. Remove the meter payment exemption
5. Direct revenue to accessibility improvements
6. Establish reasonable time limits

Photo of Aaron Bialick
Aaron was the editor of Streetsblog San Francisco from January 2012 until October 2015. He joined Streetsblog in 2010 after studying rhetoric and political communication at SF State University and spending a semester in Denmark.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog San Francisco

Caltrans and MTC Hold Greenwashing Panel for North Bay Freeway Widening

April 23, 2026

Judge Blocks Trump Admin’s Attempt to Demolish D.C. Bike Lane

April 22, 2026

Advocates Celebrate Milestone in Signature Gathering for Transit Funding Measures

April 22, 2026
See all posts