San Bruno Voters to Determine Future Downtown Growth with Measure N

The San Bruno Caltrain Station Area, as envisioned by the city’s Transit Corridors Plan with future retail and office development. Planners say the plan depends on the passage of Measure N. Image: Yes for San Bruno – Supporting Measure N

Last week, just two weeks before San Bruno voters choose whether or not to approve the Measure N ballot measure, city officials finally cleared the last legal hurdle for the measure, which would modify building height limits that voters set in 1977 with Ordinance 1284. That ordinance required a “town-hall type of hearing whereby experts, proponents, and opponents may be heard and questioned by voters,” so last Tuesday, a debate was held between San Bruno Mayor Jim Ruane and Peninsula Health Care District Board of Directors candidate Doug Radtke.

Ordinance 1284 limits all new building heights in San Bruno to 50 feet or three stories, caps residential zoning densities to those set forty years ago, and bans multi-story parking structures — unless a specific development project is approved by a majority of voters. If Measure N is approved, maximum building heights will increase to 90 feet (five stories) within one block of the new Caltrain station, to 70 feet along El Camino Real, to 65 feet along San Bruno and Huntington avenues, and to 55 feet along San Mateo Avenue. The measure would also repeal Ordinance 1284’s ban on multi-story parking structures, which will “help solve parking needs as the downtown becomes more vibrant and parking demand increases,” according to the city’s Measure N FAQ sheet.

Maximum building heights if Measure N is approved: 90 feet (yellow), 70 feet (blue), 65 feet (green), 55 feet (pink). Image: 2013 San Bruno Transit Corridors Plan

City planners say the higher building heights and residential densities specified in Measure N are critical to implement San Bruno’s Transit Corridors Plan, which aims to enable the development, over the next 20 years, of a higher-density residential and commercial area within walking distance of the city’s new Caltrain station. The station was reconstructed half a mile north of its isolated former location at Sylvan Avenue, opening in April as an elevated structure at the intersection of the city’s two main streets, San Mateo and San Bruno avenues.

“We expect full build-out to result in 4,000 additional jobs, 2,400 of which are a direct result of passing Measure N,” said Ruane, quoting a fiscal and economic impact report authored by consulting firm Economic & Planning Systems. “It would increase the population by 3,784 in the Transit Corridors Area, [with] Measure N accounting for 1,558.”


This means that over the plan’s 20-year time frame, Measure N would result in 120 more jobs and 78 more new residents per year. “But we have to make it attractive for developers to come in here, if you want to clean a lot of the downtown up,” said Mayor Ruane.

Radtke, who represented the opposition to Measure N at the city-hosted debate, said that the additional development allowed by the measure will raise living expenses for current residents, and raised the specter of anticipated downtown developments drawing outsiders to the town.

“Single-family homes are bastions of the middle class. Catering to [potential office tenants] YouTube and Walmart is basically going to end that era. It’s going to be the tech class — San Franciscans, not San Brunans,” said Radtke. “Property values will go up, and with that comes increased costs… It throws the residents of San Bruno pretty much under the bus.” Radtke did not note that over 40 percent of San Brunans live in multi-family houses, and did not offer foolproof methods that would keep “the tech class” out of a town that straddles all four major transportation arteries between San Francisco and Silicon Valley.

The Daily Journal endorsed Measure N in an editorial last month. “San Bruno, and the rest of the Peninsula, was a far different place in 1977,” wrote the newspaper, referring to the year Ordinance 1284 was passed by voters. “San Bruno is stuck with an old set of rules that prohibit many new opportunities from coming to the city.” The San Bruno Chamber of Commerce, San Mateo County Housing Leadership Council, and Greenbelt Alliance are also among the groups urging San Bruno residents to vote Yes on Measure N.

  • Easy

    Raising height limits good, wasting money on $40k per spot garages bad. What to do?

  • Kid Charles

    I think it’s great that there’s more and more transit oriented development along the Caltrain corridor but there’s a serious issue with capacity on the train and the electrification project will not do nearly enough to address it. It supposed to increase capacity by 20% 5 years from now. In the meantime trains are absolutely packed during rush hour. Also, after that project is done, what then?

  • thielges

    Require that the parking garages be easily convertible to productive space. There’s been a trend towards building garages with ceilings high enough for occupation and with floors with maximum flat and level surfaces. The only such conversion I’ve seen yet is a partial job at San Jose State.

  • Andy Chow

    There’s also plenty of transit capacity with buses and BART which is within comfortable walking and biking distance.

  • murphstahoe

    Buses – too slow in this corridor.
    BART – does not go south, is too slow going north due to circuitous routing.

  • Doug Radtke

    I wish somebody had reached out to me for a comment instead of guessing my intent. Yes, this is the Doug Radtke who wrote the opposition argument to the ballot measure.

    Opposing Measure N had nothing to do with “keeping the tech class” out of San Bruno. It had everything to do with unfairly upzoning property that either almost solely belonged to the Welch Family Trust or Artichoke Joe’s and none of it to the single family homes a street away. Raising the height limits in a broader area would allow recourse of the existing property owners to sell out to a developer who wants to build high density.

    The opposition of Measure N was an opportunity to do primarily voter education instead of just resigning it to a rubberstamped “yes”. This had nothing to do with a blanket opposition to high density housing. It’s as important to understand the major players in Measure N – highly compensated political consultant Ed McGovern who hid in the shadows of the entire Measure N proceeding. His name and signature rests on the initial ballot proposal, yet he is not a San Bruno resident capable of signing a ballot measure – what gives?

    I even took the time to reach out to one of the original San Bruno councilmembers Gary Mondfrans who penned Ordinance 1284 for his opinion.

    I’ve since Measure N actually advocated for more upzoning in San Mateo County. I completely agree with the SMDJ position that most Peninsula cities are stuck in 1977, and I think I made it quite clear in subsequent letters to the editor what my position was – that of voter education.

    But anyway, I just wanted to throw that all out there in case somebody stumbles across this article.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Voters Back Downtown Growth in San Bruno and Menlo Park

|
Tuesday’s election saw large majorities of San Bruno and Menlo Park voters approve plans for substantial new downtown development. The plans could potentially transform both downtowns by bringing several thousand more workers and residents within walking distance of the two Peninsula cities’ Caltrain stations, both improving transit ridership and making the downtowns livelier, more livable […]

Streets Bond Measure Headed to November Ballot

|
Editor’s note: This is the first in a series of occasional stories on the “2011 Road Repaving and Street Safety Bond.” A $248 million streets bond measure being pushed by San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee and other electeds is on its way to the November ballot after being approved this week in a 9-2 vote […]

Today’s Headlines

|
SFMTA CEO Ford Allegedly Excoriates Staff for Revealing Mayor’s Muni Micromanaging (The Snitch) Audit of Muni Work Orders Due This Week (Examiner) Proposed Bill Would Allow City to Install Red-Light Camera at Market and Octavia (Examiner) Muni Bus Driver Assaulted on 9-San Bruno (CBS5) Copper Wire Theft Led to N-Judah Delay Last Friday (CBS5) Police […]

Today’s Headlines

|
Uber Driver Suffers Seizure, Strikes Pedestrian at Polk and Geary (ABC, SF Exam, SFGate, CBS) 48-Year-Old Man Struck by Driver at Silver and San Bruno Sunday Night (SF Examiner) Upper Market to Get Re-Paving Soon; SFMTA Working on Car Diversions for Lower Market (SFBC) N-Judah Riders Lift a Car Out of the Way of Their Train — […]