Muni Taraval Meeting Met with Grimaces Groans and Grumbles

Supervisor Tang greeted the Crowd. Sean Kennedy, Muni Forward Program Manager, standing to her right, gave the main presentation.
Supervisor Katy Tang greets the crowd. Sean Kennedy, Muni Forward Program Manager, standing behind and to her right, gave the main presentation.

Over a hundred people braved the wind and rain yesterday evening to attend the latest public outreach meeting about SFMTA’s planned “Muni Forward” improvements to the L-Taraval streetcar line. The meeting was held at Dianne Feinstein Elementary school, about two blocks south of Taraval.

District 4 Supervisor Katy Tang kicked off the meeting. “I am here to listen,” she stressed, talking about the importance of public comment in formulating transit improvements. The main presentation was given by Sean Kennedy, SFMTA Muni Forward Program Manager. He talked about how SFMTA, as part of the Vision Zero goals, had identified Taraval as a street where safety improvements are needed. “22 people have been hit in the past five years getting off trains,” he said. “And 46 total,” making it part of the city’s “High Injury Network.”

To reduce these collisions, the agency is looking at installing more concrete platforms in some places and improving markings and law enforcement in others. Kennedy explained that a common problem is too many motorists do not understand that it is illegal to pass a stopped train when it is loading and unloading passengers. “Around a third of motorists ignore state law, putting passengers in danger,” he said.

Sean Kennedy attempts to present before an unruly audience.
Sean Kennedy, Muni Forward Program Manager, presents to a grumpy and unruly audience.

The project includes general improvements, such as rail replacement and upgrades, to smooth out and quiet the ride. They will also paint the track area as red, transit-only lanes.

However, Kennedy had to struggle to get through his presentation, as he was continually interrupted and shouted down by an unruly audience. “You’re taking parking away!” was a common refrain. Kennedy tried to explain that, yes, in places a handful of parking spots would be removed to make room for safety platforms and markings to protect riders and other pedestrians, but they would be replaced, on a one-for-one basis, with parking on side streets. When he stressed again that they need this to create safety refuges for passengers, one person shouted “Why not get people to comply when they get off the train!” The same person blamed Muni riders who got hit by cars for “wearing dark clothes at night.”

Another complained that replacing parking around the corner was not good enough. “You’re still ruining it for those merchants!” Another man shouted that 22 people hit while alighting the trains “doesn’t seem like that many” and does not warrant making changes.

After about 40 minutes, Kennedy got through his presentation–and constant interruptions–and he invited questions. “You’re following a procedure called decide, announce, defend!” said Doug Buchwald, a resident of Berkeley who frequents the area. He dismissed the notion that Muni was listening to audience suggestions. “I’m here because I’m concerned.”

Teri Lenfest, an Outer Parkside resident who held a cane, suggested Muni “take a hint from the railroads” and have grade-crossing barriers come down to block automobiles from endangering pedestrians. Kennedy suggested that would not work, as motorists would just go around them.

Buchwald complained that the plan to speed up the train by eliminating some stops was tantamount to “having two stops for the entire line, one at each end,” he said. “That may sound funny, but if you have mobility problems and it’s your stop that gets eliminated, they may as well do that.”

Audience members also grumbled that they couldn’t hear the speakers and that the presentation should have been in multiple languages. Paul Rose, chief spokesman for SFMTA, said, “it’s about the parking, they have misconceptions about the parking.” He also stressed that many more people comment about the project online. “Our main priority is safety–by 2024 we want to all but eliminate road fatalities.”

SFMTA also did surveys and went door to door for feedback. When pushed as to why the people at this meeting seemed unusually distrustful and irritable, Rose shrugged. “These are the people who showed up.”

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

L-Taraval and the Concrete Boarding Island Question

|
Back in February, Streetsblog reported on one of three meetings about SFMTA’s planned “Muni Forward” improvements to the L-Taraval line. Since then, SFMTA has held various smaller meetings with local stakeholders, confirmed SFMTA. But rumors have grown that, under the direction of Supervisor Katy Tang, the SFMTA was backing off safety improvements, such as adding […]

Was the Turning Point on Taraval a Teachable Moment?

|
A week ago today, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency decided unanimously to move forward with concrete boarding islands on the L-Taraval. And maybe, just maybe, it was also a concrete turning point towards finally putting safety first. As Streetsblog readers know all too well, every time SFMTA develops transit improvements as part of its Muni Forward […]

More Grumbles at Final Hearing on Taraval Changes

|
SFMTA, at long last, held its final hearing on the proposed Muni Forward safety and speed improvements to the L-Taraval. The two-hour meeting, which started at 10 a.m. at City Hall, was attended by some 60 people. Streetsblog readers will recall the last large hearing for Taraval was held in February and, as with many of […]

The Taraval Boarding Island Question: Q&A with Katy Tang

|
Last week, Streetsblog brought you an editorial from Katy Tang about the issue of installing concrete boarding islands on Taraval as part of SFMTA’s Muni Forward project. This was in response to a headline in the SF Examiner, that declared “Supervisor Slams Brakes on L-Taraval Changes.” As Streetsblog readers may recall, business owners were pushing […]