CA Senate Approves Funds for High-Speed Rail, Commuter Rail Upgrades

In a pivotal vote Friday, the California Senate approved $4.5 billion in bonds to begin construction of CA High-Speed Rail (CAHSR) connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles. The funds will help fund construction of the line’s initial segment in the Central Valley and upgrades for the Caltrain and Metrolink commuter rail lines in the Bay Area and Los Angeles, respectively.

CA High-Speed Rail depicted sharing tracks with Caltrain in the Bay Area. Photo: CAHSRA via ##http://www.igreenspot.com/californias-high-speed-rail-will-reduce-emission/##igreenspot.com##

The vote, which reached a majority by just one senator, came as a major relief to high-speed rail advocates. The project, which has been increasingly scrutinized since voters approved over $9 billion in bonds for it in 2008, could have been scrapped without the approval. Had the vote failed, California could have lost another $3.2 billion in matching federal funds.

“Building high-speed rail in California could reinforce cities as the hubs of our economies, significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, get commuters off congested roads, and cost much less than highway and airport expansion,” said Stuart Cohen, executive director of TransForm, which lobbies for smart growth and sustainable transportation in California.

“It will provide Californians with an improved transportation option that has for decades been available in other nations,” added Cohen, who noted that the vote comes exactly 150 years after the Transcontinental Railroad was authorized. Although high-speed rail is popular — and expanding — in other countries in Asia and Western Europe, CAHSR would be the first such system in the United States.

The previous plan from the CAHSR Authority lacked support even from TransForm, but the group praised the revised plan released in April, which reduced the project’s cost from about $100 billion to $68 billion, reduced the impacts on communities which it would run through, and provided funding to upgrade Caltrain and Metrolink tracks, which would be shared with CAHSR. “This new plan is simply much better,” said Cohen after it was released.

In San Francisco, funds approved in the Senate bill would help electrify the Caltrain tracks by 2019 and extend them to the Transbay Transit Center currently under construction. Friday’s vote was widely praised by SF officials.

The approved Senate bill “provides not only the beginning of the nation’s first high-speed rail line that will connect its diverse and growing communities, but also the local connections that will deliver the economic growth from high-speed rail into our towns and cities in the form of travelers be they commuters, tourists or students,” said a joint statement from SF Municipal Transportation Agency Director Ed Reiskin and Chairman Tom Nolan.

Some of the bill’s $1.9 billion set aside for local and regional rail projects will also go toward the controversial Central Subway project, which Reiskin and Nolan lauded in their statement, saying that the two projects will connect at Caltrain’s Fourth and King Station. Critics of the Central Subway have questioned the use of HSR funds, as it’s possible HSR won’t stop at Fourth and King.

Unclear is where the rest of the funding to construct and maintain CAHSR will come from. As part of the solution, a TransForm report [PDF] recommends that the CA legislature prioritize early funds from the state’s nascent cap-and-trade program for bicycle, pedestrian, and transit improvements around the stations planned in Central Valley cities as well as the Caltrain and Metrolink upgrades. TransForm also recommends encouraging transit-oriented development around those stations, which could provide revenue to fund “high-quality station designs” and public infrastructure improvements.

Construction on high-speed rail could be begin as early as next year, and the plan sets the completion date in 2028.

  • Anonymous

    So did they call this bill the Consultant’s Full Employment Act of 2012?  CHSRA has blown through almost a billion, and not a mile of track laid.  So the legislature decides to throw another $68 billion at it, while the state has a $16 billion deficit.  A fraction of that money could have been invested in making improvements in traditional rail to boost ridership, but no.  The magpies in the Legislature are distracted by something glititery and shiny called HSR.

  • atown

    So did they call this the Killing American Colonists Act of 1776?  Gen. Washington is down to 5000 soldiers with most enlistments up in a matter of weeks.  So Congress decides to throw more money at independence.  The Revolution will be over before you know it.

  • GoHSR!!

    NO teabagger nonsense …California’s Economy is much bigger than Greece! SanFrancisco is starting a number of construction projects and all by private money for housing and office space. HSR will be a huge plus for the future of the state

  • Anonymous

    Many rail supporters who initially supported HSR have been appalled at the way the CHSRA has squandered millions of dollars, released false or misleading data and alienated stakeholders.  I am one such supporter.

    For example, did you know that rail experts believe that the blended HSR/Caltrain option on the Peninsula will result in SF to LA trips taking longer than the 2 hr, 40 minutes required by statute http://www.calrailnews.com/crn/0412/crn0412.pdf

    Also, did you know that the CHSRA plans for the construction of 32 miles of viaducts, when the standard is to construct as few viaducts as possible? And did you know that estimated costs have ballooned from $7.0 billion for structures in 2009 and $6.2 billion for excavation in 2009 to $22.5 billion for structures and $22.3 billion for excavation in the 2012 plan?  http://www.calrailnews.com/crn/1211/crn1211.pdf 

    HSR fanboys giving their unwavering support to CHSRA is not helping the cause of rail in California.  The politicians and consultants will line their pockets whether HSR gets built or not.

  • mikesonn

    I’d love to see your analysis of the Eastern Span of the Bay Bridge.

  •  pchazzz – you’ve struck gold.

    People like Martin Engle who want to kill the project have come up with a wonderful strategy. Convince the people on the peninsula that the line as originally planned will destroy their neighborhoods, and that the “blended” plan is better. So they rally around that, get Scanlon to get in line because if that construction starts he looks good because Caltrain is finally getting electrification dollars.

    Then, as soon as that becomes the plan, use your other mouthpiece to talk about how the statute is now being violated because the trips will be too long.

    Gold, Jerry, Gold!

  • keenplanner

    it’s a must.  we can’t afford to NOT build HSR