Transportation reformers and members of Congress have long clamored for changes
to the federal government's major transit grant program, otherwise
known as "New Starts," and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood answered today with an announcement of sweeping changes in the works.
LaHood made his announcement today at the Transportation Research Board conference. (Photo: AP)The first move: LaHood's DOT will rescind a 2005 rule
that elevated "cost-effectiveness" above all other criteria used to
determine whether a local transit project can receive federal funds.
Cost remains a factor in the "New Starts" process, but is no longer
given more weight than factors such as congestion relief.
House
transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) and Rep. Pete
DeFazio (D-OR), his top lieutenant, quickly issued a statement hailing
the reversal of the Bush-era mandate, which is blamed for slowing down
transit expansions in several major cities.
"Now we need increased investment dollars to follow this
reform, so that we can move forward with transit projects that
relieve congestion, reduce emissions, increase our energy
independence, and promote more livable communities across the
country,” Oberstar said in a statement. “We must all continue to work
together toward a long-term authorization bill that makes transit
options available to more people."
The
second of the Obama administration's moves: Environmental and economic
benefits will become official factors in evaluating "New Starts"
proposals. This change requires a rulemaking by the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA), which typically includes a period of public
comment, so will not take effect immediately.
In announcing
this latter shift, LaHood and FTA chief Peter Rogoff emphasized the
need to look at the community-building benefits of transit.
"To
put it simply: We will take livability into account," LaHood said today. "This
new approach will help us do a much better job aligning our priorities
and values with our investments in transit projects that truly strengthen
communities. We’ll
finally be able to make the case for investing in popular streetcar
projects and other transit systems that people want
– and that our old ways of doing business didn’t value enough."
Late Update:
Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) weighed in with a statement connecting
today's news to the White House's broader sustainable communities push:
Rescinding this Bush administration restriction will unleash funding forimportant transportation projects across the nation, jumpstarting localeconomies and creating good jobs. This means quicker and better fundingfor streetcars, light rail, and bus projects that improve transportation,revive local economies, and reduce global warming pollution. After much hardwork with the administration and my Congressional colleagues, this is anexciting outcome that will create better and more transportationopportunities.
Even Later Update: Transportation for America weighs in on LaHood's announcement on its blog,
deeming the changes a positive step but emphasizing that cities and
towns are still competing for a limited pot of transit money.
"Even under the old narrow rules for winning approval, only a small
percentage of the many applicants were receiving limited funding," T4A communications associate Stephen Lee Davis wrote.
The
appropriate vehicle for making broad changes to the funding
distribution between roads and transit, however, remains the six-year
federal transportation bill -- which is stalled on the Hill for a
number of reasons.
LaHood
addressed the ongoing impasse over a new federal bill during his
remarks today on the transit rules change, calling fresh six-year
legislation a "critical piece of the puzzle."
"I
recognize there’s a lot of capacity and demand for additional transportation
investments across the country that
neither the stimulus nor a new jobs bill can
provide," he said. "We
need to empower regional and local transportation authorities to invest
in the kinds of projects that will spur economic growth, enhance livability,
and preserve the qualities that make each area special."
To
help advance those goals in the absence of concrete congressional
action, the former GOP lawmaker vowed that U.S. DOT would "pursue more
flexible partnerships with states, MPOs, transportation agencies, and
local communities."
