Raleigh-Durham Voters Give Go-Ahead to Light Rail Plans

Yesterday was a mixed bag for transit at the ballot box. Voters in Cincinnati beat back a second referendumthat would have prevented the city from building its planned and ready-to-go streetcar line. In Seattle, meanwhile, an initiative that would have allowed local electeds to raise vehicle license fees to support transit was rejected.
Maybe the biggest news out of last night’s election, however, comes out of North Carolina, where — hooray!! — it ended well for transit lovers. Voter approval of a sales tax increase will advance long-brewing plans for light rail in the “Golden Triangle” region, which includes Raleigh, Durham and Chapel Hill.
Yonah Freemark at the Transport Politic explains:
The passage yesterday of a half-cent sales tax increase dedicated to transit in Durham County offers strong evidence that the region’s electorate is ready to invest in new public transportation options — the referendum passed with a large 60% majority in approval. Durham’s endorsement of the transit improvement program, like similar efforts in cities from Los Angeles to Denver, provides clear evidence that voters are willing and even excited to pay higher taxes in exchange for tangible improvements in transportation.* If in the U.S. Congress future funding for mobility remains tenuous at best, local level support for such policies is clear.
For the Triangle, this is the first step towards the completion of what will not only be a vast upgrade over current transit offerings in the region but also a significant improvement on the 2000 regional rail plan.
Triangle leaders have learned from Charlotte’s success. Realizing that the FTA would be unwilling to commit to a project without a stronger demonstration of local funding efforts, politicians pushed the North Carolina State Assembly to allow counties to submit sales tax increases to their voters, an option that had been reserved for Charlotte’s Mecklenburg County until 2009. Charlotte’s half-cent sales tax provided a quarter of the light rail line’s cost, while the Triangle’s 2000 plan could cover less than 10% of costs with local revenues, which came from a tax on rental cars and vehicle registrations.
Elsewhere on the Network today: Walkable Dallas Fort-Worth exposes the misguided logic behind Austin’s jaywalking crackdown. Mobilizing the Region says that Connecticut’s new $636 million jobs bill includes some important land use and transportation reforms. And Bike Portland reports that national bike and pedestrian advocates are planning to push back against weakened support for active modes in the Senate’s new transportation bill reauthorization proposal.
Read More:
Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.
More from Streetsblog San Francisco
Driver Runs Red, Hits Cyclist, Speeds Off
Friday Video(s): Kidical Mass, Night-Biking in Tokyo, and More
Mayor Gloria’s Budget Has Deep Cuts for Safety and Bicycle Program for the San Diego Department of Transportation
Gloria when running for re-election in 2024, "Even in a difficult budget year we still put good money towards our Vision Zero plans.” Gloria's 2026 budget: Elimination of funding for the multi-modal team at SDDOT.
The post Mayor Gloria’s Budget Has Deep Cuts for Safety and Bicycle Program for the San Diego Department of Transportation appeared first on Streetsblog California.