SF Transit, Street Improvements Could Get a Boost From Vehicle License Fee

San Francisco may be on course to receive significant new revenue for transit and street improvements in the coming years following the passage of SB 1492, which specifically permits the city to vote on restoring its local vehicle license fee to historic levels.

Photo: Aaron Bialick

The legislation, which was signed by Governor Jerry Brown earlier this month, clears the way for the SF Board of Supervisors to introduce a ballot measure as soon as November 2013 to restore the local VLF to its pre-2004 level of 2 percent of the vehicle’s estimated value, up from the current statewide limit of 0.65 percent set by former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. The increase, if approved by voters, would bring in about $75 million for various city services, according to the office of State Senator Mark Leno, who introduced the bill.

There’s a very recent precedent for a successful ballot initiative to increase the vehicle registration fee. In 2010, San Francisco voters approved Prop AA, a local registration fee increase of $10 per vehicle, which now brings in $5 million per year. Half of that revenue is required to be used for street re-paving, the other half for pedestrian, transit, and bicycle improvements. As the revenue accumulates, the SF County Transportation Authority is compiling a list of projects to dole out the funds.

The Prop AA increase was permitted under a 2009 Senate bill on the condition that the funds be used specifically for transportation improvements to reduce car congestion, but those strings wouldn’t be attached to the VLF rate increase.

SB 1492 wasn’t the first bid to allow SF to increase the VLF: Since Schwarzenegger reduced the rate in 2004, Senator Leno has introduced six other similar bills, in addition to another one introduced by Senator Leland Yee in 2005. All proposals either died in the legislature or were vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger or Governor Brown. However, the statewide VLF limit was temporarily raised to 1.15 percent from mid-2009 to July 2011 under a bill introduced by Senator Noreen Evans.

A local ballot measure to increase the VLF would require a two-thirds vote by the Board of Supervisors and a simple majority approval by voters.

  • Sprague

    This is good news for a “transit first” city that so often is short on cash.  I look forward to the Board of Supervisors and the electorate restoring the VLF to its historic level.

  • Anonymous


  • Anonymous

    stable locally sourced funding means we can stop depending on the fickle members of the Legislature and Congress for money, and it means we can control how that money is spent, so it’s not wasted on BS. 

  • Anonymous

    WOW – I had no idea! First I just assumed this to be a vehicle registration fee – generally something like a flat $4 per vehicle – but this is the ‘real thing’, the infamous VLF that our former Gov. rode to replace Gov. Davis.  Thanks for keeping us posted, Aaron.

  • voltairesmistress

    Backers of a higher, local VLF would do well to tie funds raised exclusively to transportation infrastructure spending.  Why?  Because voters will pass local, targeted taxes and bonds. But we will not generally approve more funding to the City’s general
    fund.  The general fund is a politician’s playground where monies
    raised can be spent on shifting policy priorities.  Transportation, which needs intense and constant investment, will lose out

    We should tie owning and driving a car to contributing to a better
    transit and street environment overall.  If we do that, we will see a
    lot more support from drivers and transit riders alike who want real solutions and real funding for what matters to them.  Unleash it to
    the general fund and watch the ballot bonfire.

  • Aren’t ballot box budgeting and set-asides one of the biggest problems hamstringing Sacramento right now?

  • Anonymous

    Senator Leno deserves a lot of thanks from the pro-transit folks here in town. Locally sourced funding for transit ends this crazy dance with the notorious State of California over funding. This way, Sacramento can burn but it won’t affect us as much as it has in the past, when Gov. Schwarzenegger and his corporate Democrat allies killed funding for transit all the time.


Mayor-Funded BeyondChron Attacks Wiener’s Transit Funding Measure

BeyondChron editor Randy Shaw, who gets funding from the Mayor Ed Lee’s office for projects like the Tenderloin Housing Clinic, penned a predictable defense of Lee’s recent attack on Supervisor Scott Wiener’s transit funding ballot measure today. Shaw backed Lee’s decision to drop support for the vehicle license fee increase, and argued that Muni’s share of the […]